docs: Add missing information about animated styles precedence #7070
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
tjzel
approved these changes
Feb 21, 2025
MatiPl01
deleted the
@matipl01/add-missing-info-about-style-precedence
branch
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Refers to the issue: #7067
This PR adds missing information about animated styles behavior to the remarks section of the
useAnimatedStyledocumentation page.We should add proper precedence support in the future, but for now, until we figure out a valid solution to this problem, we should include information about this behavior in docs.
Screenshot
Test plan
Build docs and open the
useAnimatedStylehook docs.