Skip to content

SNOW-1545799-Verify-value-bindings-exceeding-CLIENT_STAGE_ARRAY_BINDING_THRESHOLD #2199

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 8 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

sfc-gh-ext-simba-jf
Copy link
Collaborator

Overview

SNOW-XXXXX

Pre-review self checklist

  • PR branch is updated with all the changes from master branch
  • The code is correctly formatted (run mvn -P check-style validate)
  • New public API is not unnecessary exposed (run mvn verify and inspect target/japicmp/japicmp.html)
  • The pull request name is prefixed with SNOW-XXXX:
  • Code is in compliance with internal logging requirements

External contributors - please answer these questions before submitting a pull request. Thanks!

  1. What GitHub issue is this PR addressing? Make sure that there is an accompanying issue to your PR.

    Issue: #NNNN

  2. Fill out the following pre-review checklist:

    • I am adding a new automated test(s) to verify correctness of my new code
    • I am adding new logging messages
    • I am modifying authorization mechanisms
    • I am adding new credentials
    • I am modifying OCSP code
    • I am adding a new dependency or upgrading an existing one
    • I am adding new public/protected component not marked with @SnowflakeJdbcInternalApi (note that public/protected methods/fields in classes marked with this annotation are already internal)
  3. Please describe how your code solves the related issue.

    Please write a short description of how your code change solves the related issue.

@sfc-gh-snowflakedb-snyk-sa
Copy link
Contributor

sfc-gh-snowflakedb-snyk-sa commented May 28, 2025

🎉 Snyk checks have passed. No issues have been found so far.

security/snyk check is complete. No issues have been found. (View Details)

license/snyk check is complete. No issues have been found. (View Details)

@sfc-gh-ext-simba-jf sfc-gh-ext-simba-jf marked this pull request as ready for review May 28, 2025 14:43
@sfc-gh-ext-simba-jf sfc-gh-ext-simba-jf requested a review from a team as a code owner May 28, 2025 14:43
assertEquals(rs1.getInt(1), rs2.getInt(1));

// Check tz type and ltz type columns have the same value.
assertEquals(rs1.getTimestamp(2), rs1.getTimestamp(3));
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't we test rs1 with rs2 if the values are the same?

executePrepStmtForNumRows(connection, "regularinsert", currT, 3);

// insert using stage binding
statement.execute("ALTER SESSION SET CLIENT_STAGE_ARRAY_BINDING_THRESHOLD = 10");
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It seems that this test does not need the 2nd resultset and table, as the 2nd insert does exactly the same as the 1st one.

Copy link
Collaborator

@sfc-gh-pbulawa sfc-gh-pbulawa left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

PTAL at the comments

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants