Update metrics.rs

[DoTheBestToGetTheBest]

related with #5206

i adjusted for a range up to 0.1 seconds (100ms)

[CLAassistant]

Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
_{You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.}

[dapplion]

Metrics from the original issue show that the lower resolution is not being used. Not sure @michaelsproul if you need 5ms resolution, otherwise the metric lin range could be of resolution 10ms and range up to 200ms

linear_buckets(0.01, 0.01, 20)

[michaelsproul]

yeah IMO 10ms would be fine, I would also prefer less buckets (10-15, not 20)

[michaelsproul]

@DoTheBestToGetTheBest you also need to accept the CLA

[DoTheBestToGetTheBest]

Metrics from the original issue show that the lower resolution is not being used. Not sure @michaelsproul if you need 5ms resolution, otherwise the metric lin range could be of resolution 10ms and range up to 200ms

linear_buckets(0.01, 0.01, 20)

thank you for your review!

yeah IMO 10ms would be fine, I would also prefer less buckets (10-15, not 20)

thank you for your review! changed to 10

[DoTheBestToGetTheBest]

@DoTheBestToGetTheBest you also need to accept the CLA

what is this?

[michaelsproul]

It's a contributor license agreement, it just says that you agree to license your contributions under the same license as the rest of Lighthouse (Apache 2.0). It's a bit of a bureaucratic hurdle, but only takes a second, see: #5215 (comment).

[dapplion]

Thanks! 15 should be ok

[chong-he]

@DoTheBestToGetTheBest you also need to accept the CLA

what is this?

At the bottom of this PR, or the direct link: https://cla-assistant.io/sigp/lighthouse?pullRequest=5215