Skip to content

chore(deps): update dependency esbuild to v0.25.1 #2996

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 12, 2025

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Mar 12, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
esbuild 0.25.0 -> 0.25.1 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

evanw/esbuild (esbuild)

v0.25.1

Compare Source

  • Fix incorrect paths in inline source maps (#​4070, #​4075, #​4105)

    This fixes a regression from version 0.25.0 where esbuild didn't correctly resolve relative paths contained within source maps in inline sourceMappingURL data URLs. The paths were incorrectly being passed through as-is instead of being resolved relative to the source file containing the sourceMappingURL comment, which was due to the data URL not being a file URL. This regression has been fixed, and this case now has test coverage.

  • Fix invalid generated source maps (#​4080, #​4082, #​4104, #​4107)

    This release fixes a regression from version 0.24.1 that could cause esbuild to generate invalid source maps. Specifically under certain conditions, esbuild could generate a mapping with an out-of-bounds source index. It was introduced by code that attempted to improve esbuild's handling of "null" entries in source maps (i.e. mappings with a generated position but no original position). This regression has been fixed.

    This fix was contributed by @​jridgewell.

  • Fix a regression with non-file source map paths (#​4078)

    The format of paths in source maps that aren't in the file namespace was unintentionally changed in version 0.25.0. Path namespaces is an esbuild-specific concept that is optionally available for plugins to use to distinguish paths from file paths and from paths meant for other plugins. Previously the namespace was prepended to the path joined with a : character, but version 0.25.0 unintentionally failed to prepend the namespace. The previous behavior has been restored.

  • Fix a crash with switch optimization (#​4088)

    The new code in the previous release to optimize dead code in switch statements accidentally introduced a crash in the edge case where one or more switch case values include a function expression. This is because esbuild now visits the case values first to determine whether any cases are dead code, and then visits the case bodies once the dead code status is known. That triggered some internal asserts that guard against traversing the AST in an unexpected order. This crash has been fixed by changing esbuild to expect the new traversal ordering. Here's an example of affected code:

    switch (x) {
      case '':
        return y.map(z => z.value)
      case y.map(z => z.key).join(','):
        return []
    }
  • Update Go from 1.23.5 to 1.23.7 (#​4076, #​4077)

    This should have no effect on existing code as this version change does not change Go's operating system support. It may remove certain reports from vulnerability scanners that detect which version of the Go compiler esbuild uses.

    This PR was contributed by @​MikeWillCook.


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot enabled auto-merge (squash) March 12, 2025 08:00
Copy link
Contributor Author

renovate bot commented Mar 12, 2025

⚠️ Artifact update problem

Renovate failed to update an artifact related to this branch. You probably do not want to merge this PR as-is.

♻ Renovate will retry this branch, including artifacts, only when one of the following happens:

  • any of the package files in this branch needs updating, or
  • the branch becomes conflicted, or
  • you click the rebase/retry checkbox if found above, or
  • you rename this PR's title to start with "rebase!" to trigger it manually

The artifact failure details are included below:

File name: package-lock.json
npm warn Unknown env config "store". This will stop working in the next major version of npm.
npm error code ERESOLVE
npm error ERESOLVE could not resolve
npm error
npm error While resolving: @types/[email protected]
npm error Found: @types/[email protected]
npm error node_modules/@types/chai
npm error   dev @types/chai@"5.2.0" from the root project
npm error
npm error Could not resolve dependency:
npm error peer @types/chai@"<5.2.0" from @types/[email protected]
npm error node_modules/@types/chai-subset
npm error   dev @types/chai-subset@"1.3.6" from the root project
npm error
npm error Conflicting peer dependency: @types/[email protected]
npm error node_modules/@types/chai
npm error   peer @types/chai@"<5.2.0" from @types/[email protected]
npm error   node_modules/@types/chai-subset
npm error     dev @types/chai-subset@"1.3.6" from the root project
npm error
npm error Fix the upstream dependency conflict, or retry
npm error this command with --force or --legacy-peer-deps
npm error to accept an incorrect (and potentially broken) dependency resolution.
npm error
npm error
npm error For a full report see:
npm error /runner/cache/others/npm/_logs/2025-03-12T08_00_20_674Z-eresolve-report.txt
npm error A complete log of this run can be found in: /runner/cache/others/npm/_logs/2025-03-12T08_00_20_674Z-debug-0.log

@renovate renovate bot merged commit 2674fbb into main Mar 12, 2025
0 of 14 checks passed
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/esbuild-0.x branch March 12, 2025 08:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants