Skip to content

Fix dependency break (#417) #418

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 29, 2024

Conversation

rasjani
Copy link
Contributor

@rasjani rasjani commented Mar 13, 2024

Python-Appium-Client 4.0.0 has removed certain features installation breaks currently as current codebase still uses those removed features like TouchAction

Implements

Fixing

Python-Appium-Client 4.0.0 has removed certain features installation
breaks currently as current codebase still uses those removed features
like TouchAction
@filipehba
Copy link
Contributor

Great fix 👍🏻

@HApolonio
Copy link

When will this be merged? But more importantly, when will the root cause be addressed, fixing the reference to TouchAction?

@serhatbolsu
Copy link
Owner

Thank you @rasjani , looking for support on getting back support post 4.0

@serhatbolsu serhatbolsu merged commit 5f5e1f9 into serhatbolsu:master Apr 29, 2024
@Leemur89
Copy link

hello,
I can see that this fix has been merged, thank you
But I do not see any new release, and last release is from 2022
Will there be a new release soon?

@Wolfe1
Copy link
Contributor

Wolfe1 commented May 22, 2024

@Leemur89 There seems to be a release candidate that was created 5 days ago so you could use that for now: https://pypi.org/project/robotframework-appiumlibrary/#history

@emanlove
Copy link
Collaborator

As Brandon noted I am working on the next release. At this point it is mostly the release notes that I need to put together. Raphael (or anyone else) if you have the time and system to try out the release candidate it would be good to get some feedback.

@josuedavidzero443
Copy link

Hello, is there a plan to implement the latest Appium Library Client rather than just suggest a downgrade?, thank you in advance

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants