Skip to content

R6RS with/without errata #6

Open
@lassik

Description

@lassik

Current R6RS link is to http://www.r6rs.org/final/r6rs.pdf with a separate link to the errata listing at http://www.r6rs.org/r6rs-errata.html.

@weinholt You have errata-corrected PDFs up at https://weinholt.se/scheme/r6rs/. In my opinion we should forgo the separate errata listing and link directly to those. Or is there a particular reason someone would prefer to read the original erroneous versions instead? :)

You have the standard split into four separate PDFs (language; standard libraries; non-normative appendices; rationale). Should we link to at least the language and libraries?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions