Skip to content

Should classic/experimental implementations be listed? #43

Open
@lassik

Description

@lassik

The current list features:

Javascript Interpreter

BiwaScheme

Unmaintained

Larceny
Scheme 48
Scsh
Ypsilon

While these are all interesting implementations with an interesting history, none of them would currently be a natural choice for people starting a new Scheme project unless those people are experts who really know what they are doing.

Since we already have so many actively maintained and documented implementations with active user communities, I think we should drop these classic/experimental ones from the list. They can and should be included in more full-featured lists and histories of Scheme, but not in an introductory showcase like Awesome Scheme.

Opinions?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions