tests: Do not run afoul of asm.validity.non-exhaustive in input-stats #142285
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
|
rustbot
added
S-waiting-on-review
|
@bors r+ rollup |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
fmease
added a commit
to fmease/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 10, 2025
…ly, r=nnethercote tests: Do not run afoul of asm.validity.non-exhaustive in input-stats This addresses one of the three powerpc64-unknown-linux-musl test failures in rust-lang#142280 I was motivated to cover it myself because technically this is also compile-time UB if we compile a program that has `asm!` with x86-64-specific instructions on another platform. That'll only mean something if this is ever switched to build-pass, or if checking emits object code, but conveniently "nop" is valid assembly on all platforms anyone has implemented Rust codegen for. Even the weird ones LLVM doesn't support, like PA-RISC or Common Intermediate Language. ...except GPUs. Not sure about those. r? `@nnethercote`
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 11, 2025
Rollup of 13 pull requests Successful merges: - #128425 (Make `missing_fragment_specifier` an unconditional error) - #141639 (Expose discriminant values in stable_mir) - #141967 (Configure bootstrap backport nominations through triagebot) - #142042 (Make E0621 missing lifetime suggestion verbose) - #142176 (tests: Split dont-shuffle-bswaps along opt-levels and arches) - #142235 (Build rustc with assertions in `dist-alt` jobs) - #142248 (Add supported asm types for LoongArch32) - #142272 (tests: Change ABIs in tests to more future-resilient ones) - #142282 (Only run `citool` tests on the `auto` branch) - #142285 (tests: Do not run afoul of asm.validity.non-exhaustive in input-stats) - #142297 (Implement `//@ needs-target-std` compiletest directive) - #142298 (Make loongarch-none target maintainers more easily pingable) - #142306 (Dont unwrap and re-wrap typing envs) Failed merges: - #141942 (Implement representation options to smir) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
workingjubilee
added a commit
to workingjubilee/rustc
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 11, 2025
…ly, r=nnethercote tests: Do not run afoul of asm.validity.non-exhaustive in input-stats This addresses one of the three powerpc64-unknown-linux-musl test failures in rust-lang#142280 I was motivated to cover it myself because technically this is also compile-time UB if we compile a program that has `asm!` with x86-64-specific instructions on another platform. That'll only mean something if this is ever switched to build-pass, or if checking emits object code, but conveniently "nop" is valid assembly on all platforms anyone has implemented Rust codegen for. Even the weird ones LLVM doesn't support, like PA-RISC or Common Intermediate Language. ...except GPUs. Not sure about those. r? ``@nnethercote``
|
@bors r- something's up. |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-author
workingjubilee
force-pushed
the
dont-use-bad-assembly
branch
from
3a5187a to
07826e8
Compare
|
Changes to the size of AST and/or HIR nodes. cc @nnethercote |
|
...I don't understand why the test didn't fail in PR CI when I pushed it the first time? |
workingjubilee
added
the
A-testsuite
|
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #142442) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
workingjubilee
force-pushed
the
dont-use-bad-assembly
branch
from
07826e8 to
1aba008
Compare
|
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #142962) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
workingjubilee
force-pushed
the
dont-use-bad-assembly
branch
from
1aba008 to
2338821
Compare
|
@bors r=nnethercote |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
workingjubilee
added a commit
to workingjubilee/rustc
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 26, 2025
…ly, r=nnethercote tests: Do not run afoul of asm.validity.non-exhaustive in input-stats This addresses one of the three powerpc64-unknown-linux-musl test failures in rust-lang#142280 I was motivated to cover it myself because technically this is also compile-time UB if we compile a program that has `asm!` with x86-64-specific instructions on another platform. That'll only mean something if this is ever switched to build-pass, or if checking emits object code, but conveniently "nop" is valid assembly on all platforms anyone has implemented Rust codegen for. Even the weird ones LLVM doesn't support, like PA-RISC or Common Intermediate Language. ...except GPUs. Not sure about those. r? `@nnethercote`
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 26, 2025
Rollup of 17 pull requests Successful merges: - #124595 (Suggest cloning `Arc` moved into closure) - #139594 (Simplify `ObligationCauseCode::IfExpression`) - #141311 (make `tidy-alphabetical` use a natural sort) - #141648 ([rustdoc] Do not emit redundant_explicit_links lint if the doc comment comes from expansion) - #142255 (Add edition checks for some tests that had divergent output) - #142285 (tests: Do not run afoul of asm.validity.non-exhaustive in input-stats) - #142549 (small iter.intersperse.fold() optimization) - #142637 (Remove some glob imports from the type system) - #142647 ([perf] Compute hard errors without diagnostics in impl_intersection_has_impossible_obligation) - #142700 (Remove incorrect comments in `Weak`) - #142884 (StableMIR: Add method to retrieve body of coroutine) - #142925 (Rewrite `.gitattributes` CRLF ui tests into run-make tests) - #143001 (Rename run always ) - #143010 (Update `browser-ui-test` version to `0.20.7`) - #143015 (Add `sym::macro_pin` diagnostic item for `core::pin::pin!()`) - #143020 (codegen_fn_attrs: make comment more precise) - #143033 (Expand const-stabilized API links in relnotes) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 26, 2025
…ly, r=nnethercote tests: Do not run afoul of asm.validity.non-exhaustive in input-stats This addresses one of the three powerpc64-unknown-linux-musl test failures in rust-lang#142280 I was motivated to cover it myself because technically this is also compile-time UB if we compile a program that has `asm!` with x86-64-specific instructions on another platform. That'll only mean something if this is ever switched to build-pass, or if checking emits object code, but conveniently "nop" is valid assembly on all platforms anyone has implemented Rust codegen for. Even the weird ones LLVM doesn't support, like PA-RISC or Common Intermediate Language. ...except GPUs. Not sure about those. r? ``@nnethercote``
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 26, 2025
Rollup of 9 pull requests Successful merges: - #124595 (Suggest cloning `Arc` moved into closure) - #139594 (Simplify `ObligationCauseCode::IfExpression`) - #141311 (make `tidy-alphabetical` use a natural sort) - #141648 ([rustdoc] Do not emit redundant_explicit_links lint if the doc comment comes from expansion) - #142285 (tests: Do not run afoul of asm.validity.non-exhaustive in input-stats) - #142393 (Don't give APITs names with macro expansion placeholder fragments in it) - #142884 (StableMIR: Add method to retrieve body of coroutine) - #142981 (Make missing lifetime suggestion verbose) - #143030 (Fix suggestion spans inside macros for the `unused_must_use` lint) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
compiler-errors
added a commit
to compiler-errors/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 26, 2025
…ly, r=nnethercote tests: Do not run afoul of asm.validity.non-exhaustive in input-stats This addresses one of the three powerpc64-unknown-linux-musl test failures in rust-lang#142280 I was motivated to cover it myself because technically this is also compile-time UB if we compile a program that has `asm!` with x86-64-specific instructions on another platform. That'll only mean something if this is ever switched to build-pass, or if checking emits object code, but conveniently "nop" is valid assembly on all platforms anyone has implemented Rust codegen for. Even the weird ones LLVM doesn't support, like PA-RISC or Common Intermediate Language. ...except GPUs. Not sure about those. r? ````@nnethercote````
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 26, 2025
Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - #124595 (Suggest cloning `Arc` moved into closure) - #139594 (Simplify `ObligationCauseCode::IfExpression`) - #141311 (make `tidy-alphabetical` use a natural sort) - #141648 ([rustdoc] Do not emit redundant_explicit_links lint if the doc comment comes from expansion) - #142285 (tests: Do not run afoul of asm.validity.non-exhaustive in input-stats) - #142393 (Don't give APITs names with macro expansion placeholder fragments in it) - #142884 (StableMIR: Add method to retrieve body of coroutine) - #142981 (Make missing lifetime suggestion verbose) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 26, 2025
Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - #124595 (Suggest cloning `Arc` moved into closure) - #139594 (Simplify `ObligationCauseCode::IfExpression`) - #141311 (make `tidy-alphabetical` use a natural sort) - #141648 ([rustdoc] Do not emit redundant_explicit_links lint if the doc comment comes from expansion) - #142285 (tests: Do not run afoul of asm.validity.non-exhaustive in input-stats) - #142393 (Don't give APITs names with macro expansion placeholder fragments in it) - #142884 (StableMIR: Add method to retrieve body of coroutine) - #142981 (Make missing lifetime suggestion verbose) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 27, 2025
Rollup merge of #142285 - workingjubilee:dont-use-bad-assembly, r=nnethercote tests: Do not run afoul of asm.validity.non-exhaustive in input-stats This addresses one of the three powerpc64-unknown-linux-musl test failures in #142280 I was motivated to cover it myself because technically this is also compile-time UB if we compile a program that has `asm!` with x86-64-specific instructions on another platform. That'll only mean something if this is ever switched to build-pass, or if checking emits object code, but conveniently "nop" is valid assembly on all platforms anyone has implemented Rust codegen for. Even the weird ones LLVM doesn't support, like PA-RISC or Common Intermediate Language. ...except GPUs. Not sure about those. r? ```@nnethercote```
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This addresses one of the three powerpc64-unknown-linux-musl test failures in #142280
I was motivated to cover it myself because technically this is also compile-time UB if we compile a program that has
asm!with x86-64-specific instructions on another platform. That'll only mean something if this is ever switched to build-pass, or if checking emits object code, but conveniently "nop" is valid assembly on all platforms anyone has implemented Rust codegen for. Even the weird ones LLVM doesn't support, like PA-RISC or Common Intermediate Language....except GPUs. Not sure about those.
r? @nnethercote