Skip to content

Don't add wf clauses for function args #625

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 12, 2020

Conversation

jackh726
Copy link
Member

Closes #556

We might want to add this back in correctly at some point, but it does need some design work anyways (in terms of what WF functions mean). For now, this is broken and not needed for any tests. So remove it.

@nikomatsakis nikomatsakis merged commit d2daf10 into rust-lang:master Oct 12, 2020
@nikomatsakis
Copy link
Contributor

As we said in the chalk meeting last week, I believe, we can't really descend through binders this way, and I think that for backwards compatibility and other reasons we don't really want to.

@jackh726 jackh726 deleted the wf-fn-args branch October 12, 2020 20:52
@jackh726 jackh726 restored the wf-fn-args branch December 15, 2020 19:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Incorrect elaboration of WellFormed clauses for functions
2 participants