Dependency errors do not show `title` or `ui:title`

[chibacchie]

Prerequisites

• I have searched the existing issues
• I understand that providing a SSCCE example is tremendously useful to the maintainers.
• I have read the documentation
• Ideally, I'm providing a sample JSFiddle, Codesandbox.io or preferably a shared playground link demonstrating the issue.

What theme are you using?

validator-ajv8

Version

5.23.1

Current Behavior

Dependency errors do not show title or ui:title.

const Ajv2019 = require('ajv/dist/2019');
const { customizeValidator } = require('@rjsf/validator-ajv8');

const schema = {
  type: 'object',
  properties: {
    creditCard: {
      type: 'number',
      title: 'Credit card',
    },
    billingAddress: {
      type: 'string',
      title: 'Billing address',
    },
  },
  dependentRequired: {
    creditCard: ['billingAddress'],
  },
};

const validator = customizeValidator({ AjvClass: Ajv2019 });
const result = validator.validateFormData({ creditCard: 1234567890 }, schema);
console.log(result.errors[0].message);

This results in must have property billingAddress when property creditCard is present.

Expected Behavior

must have property 'Billing address' when property 'Credit card' is present is expected.

There are two possible causes:

1. ajv does not enclose raw property names with quotes (see here) while transformRJSFValidationErrors() expects property names are enclosed.
2. transformRJSFValidationErrors() only handles missingProperty (see this block). property and deps should be handled as well.

Steps To Reproduce

Please see above.

Environment

- OS: Ubuntu 24.04
- Node: 18.20.2
- npm: 10.5.0

Anything else?

No response

[heath-freenome]

@chibacchie does your fix in #4398 also fix this issue?

[chibacchie]

@heath-freenome I did not fix this issue in #4398. To fix this issue, we may:

1. Ask ajv to enclose raw property names with quotes
2. Improve transformRJSFValidationErrors() to handle property and deps

[heath-freenome]

@chibacchie The probability of AJV making that change is lower than fixing our code. Is that something that you are willing to attempt?

[chibacchie]

@heath-freenome Indeed. I made a PR which is only applicable if we use an ajv-18n localizer (See #4417). For the case without localizer, I plan to submit a PR for ajv as I don't have any idea to fix this issue without changing ajv.

[TheOneTheOnlyJJ]

I agree, we should do our best to request consistency from ajv.