Skip to content

Use dict instead of Dict.t everywhere #7136

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 31, 2024
Merged

Use dict instead of Dict.t everywhere #7136

merged 2 commits into from
Oct 31, 2024

Conversation

cknitt
Copy link
Member

@cknitt cknitt commented Oct 30, 2024

Use the builtin type dict everywhere instead of Dict.t/Js.Dict.t.

Remove Dict.t for consistency (we don't have Array.t or String.t either.

@cknitt cknitt force-pushed the dict-cleanup branch 2 times, most recently from f367db0 to 2b541ee Compare October 30, 2024 16:01
@cknitt cknitt requested a review from zth October 30, 2024 16:15
@cknitt cknitt changed the title (Js.)Dict.t -> dict Remove Dict.t and use dict everywhere Oct 30, 2024
Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Performance Alert ⚠️

Possible performance regression was detected for benchmark 'Syntax Benchmarks'.
Benchmark result of this commit is worse than the previous benchmark result exceeding threshold 1.05.

Benchmark suite Current: 2fd5c88 Previous: e1b7fb7 Ratio
Print RedBlackTree.res - time/run 2.42869192 ms 2.3104395133333333 ms 1.05

This comment was automatically generated by workflow using github-action-benchmark.

@cknitt cknitt changed the title Remove Dict.t and use dict everywhere Use dict instead of Dict.t everywhere Oct 31, 2024
@cknitt cknitt merged commit 4dcd84b into master Oct 31, 2024
20 checks passed
@cknitt cknitt deleted the dict-cleanup branch October 31, 2024 18:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants