Optional record fields rendered incorrectly in type errors

[cknitt]

E.g.:

A.res:

type a = {x?: string}

A.resi:

type a = {y?: string}

=>

    Type declarations do not match:
         type rec a = {?x: string}
       is not included in
         type rec a = {?y: string}

It should be x?: string, not ?x: string.

And isn't rec incorrect, too?

[cristianoc]

Thanks, probably the outcome printer.

The rec thing looks strange.