Skip to content

Include field names in Archetype docs #9563

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 10, 2025
Merged

Conversation

emilk
Copy link
Member

@emilk emilk commented Apr 10, 2025

Include field names when listing the components of an archetype.

Field names will become more important in the future, and is already important context.

Before

image

After

image

@emilk emilk added 📖 documentation Improvements or additions to documentation include in changelog labels Apr 10, 2025
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Apr 10, 2025

Web viewer built successfully. If applicable, you should also test it:

  • I have tested the web viewer
Result Commit Link Manifest
886e214 https://rerun.io/viewer/pr/9563 +nightly +main

Note: This comment is updated whenever you push a commit.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Apr 10, 2025

Latest documentation preview deployed successfully.

Result Commit Link
886e214 https://landing-1g67o80iy-rerun.vercel.app/docs

Note: This comment is updated whenever you push a commit.

Copy link
Member

@abey79 abey79 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

very nice change

@emilk emilk merged commit 8b7be1f into main Apr 10, 2025
40 of 41 checks passed
@emilk emilk deleted the emilk/improve-archetype-docs branch April 10, 2025 08:01
@emilk emilk mentioned this pull request Apr 11, 2025
16 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
📖 documentation Improvements or additions to documentation include in changelog
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants