-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10.7k
fix(dev): don't use "module"
server conditions in Vitest
#13870
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: dev
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
🦋 Changeset detectedLatest commit: 86c6173 The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump. This PR includes changesets to release 11 packages
Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are. Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR |
Hi @remorses, Welcome, and thank you for contributing to React Router! Before we consider your pull request, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement (CLA). We require this only once. You may review the CLA and sign it by adding your name to contributors.yml. Once the CLA is signed, the If you have already signed the CLA and received this response in error, or if you have any questions, please contact us at [email protected]. Thanks! - The Remix team |
Thank you for signing the Contributor License Agreement. Let's get this merged! 🥳 |
Another solution would be to only add the "node" condition and do not use the The default Vite ssr config does not seem to use |
@remorses I see we have opened somewhat similar PRs at almost the same time. Mine can be seen here: #13871 . Note that the fallout of misapplying those conditions is bigger and not unique to Vitest - my PR addresses the whole problem by "reusing" the correct defaults. EDIT:// Actually, I might have jumped the gun here. You'd have to check if my PR solves your Vitest problem because it might not - it depends on the actual root cause of that problem. It might overlap with mine but maybe it doesn't. |
Hey, I already tried your PR but it did not fix the issue, module needs to be removed from the conditions field too |
"module"
server conditions in Vite
"module"
server conditions in Vite"module"
server conditions in Vitest
This PR fixes a problem that already 106 people had to debug and find by themselves (which takes a lot of time) |
Fix #13869