Feature add test documentation 411 #424
Conversation
#411 -) Additions with file docs/Testing.md: * re-drafted previous documentation about project testing. * added "Dependencies NOT included." for clearity * related work.
Changes in file LICENSE.md: * reworded advisory for readability * related work Changes in file docs/Testing.md: * improved documentation regarding testing a bunch * related work
WalkthroughThe changes introduce comprehensive documentation updates and clarifications regarding testing practices, CI/CD workflows, and licensing for the Multicast project. New sections and files elaborate on testing frameworks, dependency licensing, and CI/CD processes, while existing documentation is expanded, restructured, or annotated to improve clarity and compliance. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Dev as Developer
participant Repo as GitHub Repo
participant CI as CI/CD System
participant Artifacts as Artifact Store
Dev->>Repo: Push code
Repo->>CI: Trigger CI workflow
CI->>CI: Run build job
CI->>Artifacts: Store build artifact
CI->>CI: Run MATs, full tests, docs generation
CI->>Artifacts: Store test summaries, coverage
CI->>Repo: Report status via GitHub Checks
CI->>External: Send metrics to CodeCov, DeepSource, CodeClimate
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Poem
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
github-actions
bot
added
documentation
|
Here's the code health analysis summary for commits Analysis Summary
Code Coverage Report
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 19
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
LICENSE.md(1 hunks)docs/CI.md(1 hunks)docs/Testing.md(1 hunks)docs/requirements.txt(1 hunks)docs/toc.md(1 hunks)tests/requirements.txt(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (3)
`docs/*`: When a project contains a `docs/` directory: 1. Consider the files in the `docs/` directory tree the core/main/in-depth documentation of the project. Also consider the...
docs/*: When a project contains adocs/directory: 1. Consider the files in thedocs/directory tree the core/main/in-depth documentation
of the project. Also consider the 'docs/**.md' files the second place to look for
project documentation after the 'README.md' file.
2. When reviewing the documentation files (e.g.docs/**.md), they should additionally
be linted with help from the toolmarkdownlint, pointing out any issues.
3. When reviewing the documentation files indocs/directory, they should additionally
be linted with help from the toollanguagetool, pointing out any issues.
docs/toc.mddocs/requirements.txtdocs/Testing.mddocs/CI.md
`tests/*`: When reviewing **test** code: 1. Prioritize portability over clarity, especially when dealing with cross-Python compatibility. However, with the priority in mind, do ...
tests/*: When reviewing test code: 1. Prioritize portability over clarity, especially when dealing with cross-Python
compatibility. However, with the priority in mind, do still consider improvements
to clarity when relevant.
2. As a general guideline, consider the code style advocated in the PEP 8 standard
(excluding the use of spaces for indentation) and evaluate suggested changes
for code style compliance.
3. As a style convention, consider the code style advocated in
CEP-8
and evaluate suggested changes for code style compliance, pointing out any
violations discovered.
4. As a style convention, consider the code style advocated in
CEP-9
and evaluate suggested changes for nomenclature compliance, pointing out any
violations discovered, along with suggestions generated to correct the nomenclature.
5. As a general guideline, try to provide any relevant, official, and supporting
documentation links to any tool's suggestions in review comments. This guideline is
important for posterity.
6. As a project rule, Python source files with names prefixed by the string
"test_" and located in the project's "tests" directory are the project's unit-testing
code. It is safe, albeit a heuristic, to assume these are considered part of the
project's minimal acceptance testing unless a justifying exception to this assumption
is documented.
7. As a project rule, any files without extensions and with names prefixed by either the
string "check_" or the string "test_", and located in the project's "tests" directory,
are the project's non-unit test code. "Non-unit test" in this context refers to any
type of testing other than unit testing, such as (but not limited to)
functional testing, style linting, regression testing, etc. It can also be assumed
that non-unit testing code is usually (but not always) written as Bash shell scripts.
tests/requirements.txt
`tests/requirements.txt`: 1. The multicast project's own dependencies are recorded in './requirements.txt' for production code. 2. The project's testing-specific Python dependencie...
tests/requirements.txt: 1. The multicast project's own dependencies are recorded in './requirements.txt' for production code. 2. The project's testing-specific Python dependencies are recorded in
'tests/requirements.txt' and are used for testing the project.
3. Consider these the records of truth regarding project test code dependencies. 4. The project's testing-specific dependencies are optional and considered non-default
extras when selected.
tests/requirements.txt
🧠 Learnings (2)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#115
File: multicast/hear.py:180-180
Timestamp: 2024-09-19T03:43:24.037Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to re-use already loaded modules to keep memory overhead low when possible.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#115
File: multicast/hear.py:180-180
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:30.537Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to re-use already loaded modules to keep memory overhead low when possible.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#415
File: .github/AI_USAGE_POLICY.md:32-34
Timestamp: 2025-05-25T21:33:32.335Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to maintain existing documentation style and wording in policy documents, declining stylistic refinements when the current text is functional, indicating a preference for stability over cosmetic improvements in documentation.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#379
File: .ast-grep/utils/python/structure/multicast-mtool-subclass-definitions/undecorated_function_definition.yml:8-12
Timestamp: 2025-04-23T04:07:24.393Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall follows the "Avoid Hasty Abstraction" principle, being cautious about changes that might introduce unnecessary abstractions or alter existing behavior, particularly in configuration files like ast-grep rule definitions.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#139
File: tests/test_fuzz.py:73-73
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:27.171Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers not to introduce new dependencies into the codebase when writing test functions.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#402
File: .github/actions/setup-py-reqs/action.yml:79-85
Timestamp: 2025-05-17T02:33:33.421Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to maintain the original structure of conditional statements when fixing logic errors in GitHub Action YAML files, and relies on environment variables with proper defaults rather than dynamic fallbacks when handling input parameters.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#420
File: docs/CI.md:445-447
Timestamp: 2025-05-27T04:12:39.221Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to maintain intentional wording choices in documentation even when automated grammar tools suggest changes, indicating a preference for preserving deliberate stylistic decisions over automated corrections.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#235
File: .github/workflows/makefile-lint.yml:41-52
Timestamp: 2024-12-06T08:21:21.876Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to suppress errors in `apt-get install` commands when individual checks of the installed packages are performed afterwards, to allow for more granular error handling.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#118
File: tests/check_pip:92-197
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:30.537Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers defining functions before they are called in Bash scripts to avoid errors due to Bash's sequential interpretation.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#392
File: multicast/send.py:312-320
Timestamp: 2025-05-05T20:10:48.364Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers simpler implementations that maintain a component's single responsibility (like argparse), even when it means not explicitly handling all edge cases such as mutual exclusivity of command-line arguments.
docs/Testing.md (1)
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2024-12-17T23:18:31.022Z
Learning: In the multicast project's test framework, organize tests into distinct groups: Minimum Acceptance Tests (MATs), Extra Tests, Fuzzing Tests, and Performance Tests. MATs should include basic tests, doctests, SAY tests (multicast/send.py), HEAR tests (multicast/recv.py and multicast/hear.py), usage tests (__main__.py), build tests, and bootstrap tests.
🪛 LanguageTool
LICENSE.md
[style] ~33-~33: Consider removing “of” to be more concise
Context: ...le licenses (but not be bundled). While all of the source code is open-source, using some ...
(ALL_OF_THE)
docs/Testing.md
[style] ~10-~10: Consider removing “of” to be more concise
Context: ...plit between multiple licenses. > While all of the source-code is open-source, using some ...
(ALL_OF_THE)
[style] ~20-~20: This phrase is redundant. Consider using “outside”.
Context: ...ibility or support for the testing code outside of the specified environments. > Users are...
(OUTSIDE_OF)
[uncategorized] ~28-~28: The abbreviation “e.g.” (= for example) requires two periods.
Context: ...D but can also be initiated > manually (eg. in your local environment) with the bas...
(E_G)
[uncategorized] ~38-~38: The abbreviation “e.g.” (= for example) requires two periods.
Context: ...rectory inside the .github directory (eg. .github/tools). * Unit-testing is pr...
(E_G)
[uncategorized] ~73-~73: A comma may be missing after the conjunctive/linking adverb ‘Currently’.
Context: ...sh make test-mats ``` #### Categories Currently MATs are comprised of the test categori...
(SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA)
[style] ~99-~99: Consider an alternative for the overused word “exactly”.
Context: ...tant part. In, general a test runner is exactly what it sounds like, the component resp...
(EXACTLY_PRECISELY)
[uncategorized] ~235-~235: A comma may be missing after the conjunctive/linking adverb ‘Currently’.
Context: ...nal fuzz testing aptly named fuzzing. Currently the fuzzing test group contains only ...
(SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA)
[uncategorized] ~249-~249: A comma may be missing after the conjunctive/linking adverb ‘Currently’.
Context: ...ance testing aptly named performance. Currently the performance test group contains o...
(SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA)
[grammar] ~278-~278: The word “fall-back” is a noun. The verb is spelled with a space.
Context: ... to categorize their new test code, may fall-back to the > coverage category, so not to...
(NOUN_VERB_CONFUSION)
[uncategorized] ~306-~306: Did you mean: “By default,”?
Context: ...``` #### Logging and Coverage testing By default logging from the multicast module is ...
(BY_DEFAULT_COMMA)
[style] ~315-~315: Consider using a synonym to be more concise.
Context: ...d). > [!TIP] > Code coverage can leave a lot of artifacts after testing, so it is a goo...
(A_LOT_OF)
docs/CI.md
[uncategorized] ~70-~70: The abbreviation “e.g.” (= for example) requires two periods.
Context: ...uted to multiple services for analysis (eg. codecov.io, codeclimate.com, app.deepso...
(E_G)
[uncategorized] ~110-~110: The abbreviation “e.g.” (= for example) requires two periods.
Context: ...r details) the multicast python source (eg. multicast/*.py), failing on any linte...
(E_G)
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
docs/Testing.md
66-66: Ordered list item prefix
Expected: 2; Actual: 1; Style: 1/2/3
(MD029, ol-prefix)
90-90: Headings should be surrounded by blank lines
Expected: 1; Actual: 0; Above
(MD022, blanks-around-headings)
90-90: Multiple top-level headings in the same document
null
(MD025, single-title, single-h1)
96-96: Heading levels should only increment by one level at a time
Expected: h2; Actual: h4
(MD001, heading-increment)
292-292: Blank line inside blockquote
null
(MD028, no-blanks-blockquote)
295-295: Blank line inside blockquote
null
(MD028, no-blanks-blockquote)
docs/CI.md
57-57: Line length
Expected: 100; Actual: 193
(MD013, line-length)
57-57: Ordered list item prefix
Expected: 2; Actual: 1; Style: 1/2/3
(MD029, ol-prefix)
59-59: Ordered list item prefix
Expected: 2; Actual: 1; Style: 1/2/3
(MD029, ol-prefix)
61-61: Line length
Expected: 100; Actual: 156
(MD013, line-length)
61-61: Ordered list item prefix
Expected: 2; Actual: 1; Style: 1/2/3
(MD029, ol-prefix)
62-62: Line length
Expected: 100; Actual: 119
(MD013, line-length)
62-62: Ordered list item prefix
Expected: 3; Actual: 1; Style: 1/2/3
(MD029, ol-prefix)
63-63: Line length
Expected: 100; Actual: 137
(MD013, line-length)
63-63: Ordered list item prefix
Expected: 3; Actual: 1; Style: 1/2/3
(MD029, ol-prefix)
64-64: Line length
Expected: 100; Actual: 172
(MD013, line-length)
64-64: Ordered list item prefix
Expected: 3; Actual: 1; Style: 1/2/3
(MD029, ol-prefix)
65-65: Line length
Expected: 100; Actual: 194
(MD013, line-length)
67-67: Ordered list item prefix
Expected: 2; Actual: 1; Style: 1/2/3
(MD029, ol-prefix)
68-68: Line length
Expected: 100; Actual: 123
(MD013, line-length)
68-68: Ordered list item prefix
Expected: 2; Actual: 1; Style: 1/2/3
(MD029, ol-prefix)
69-69: Line length
Expected: 100; Actual: 193
(MD013, line-length)
69-69: Ordered list item prefix
Expected: 4; Actual: 1; Style: 1/2/3
(MD029, ol-prefix)
70-70: Line length
Expected: 100; Actual: 175
(MD013, line-length)
71-71: Line length
Expected: 100; Actual: 215
(MD013, line-length)
71-71: Ordered list item prefix
Expected: 2; Actual: 1; Style: 1/2/3
(MD029, ol-prefix)
72-72: Line length
Expected: 100; Actual: 115
(MD013, line-length)
72-72: Ordered list item prefix
Expected: 3; Actual: 1; Style: 1/2/3
(MD029, ol-prefix)
73-73: Line length
Expected: 100; Actual: 172
(MD013, line-length)
73-73: Ordered list item prefix
Expected: 5; Actual: 1; Style: 1/2/3
(MD029, ol-prefix)
74-74: Line length
Expected: 100; Actual: 132
(MD013, line-length)
75-75: Line length
Expected: 100; Actual: 128
(MD013, line-length)
75-75: Ordered list item prefix
Expected: 2; Actual: 1; Style: 1/2/3
(MD029, ol-prefix)
77-77: Line length
Expected: 100; Actual: 583
(MD013, line-length)
107-107: Line length
Expected: 100; Actual: 146
(MD013, line-length)
107-107: Ordered list item prefix
Expected: 2; Actual: 1; Style: 1/2/3
(MD029, ol-prefix)
108-108: Line length
Expected: 100; Actual: 129
(MD013, line-length)
109-109: Line length
Expected: 100; Actual: 159
(MD013, line-length)
109-109: Ordered list item prefix
Expected: 2; Actual: 1; Style: 1/2/3
(MD029, ol-prefix)
110-110: Line length
Expected: 100; Actual: 163
(MD013, line-length)
110-110: Ordered list item prefix
Expected: 3; Actual: 1; Style: 1/2/3
(MD029, ol-prefix)
111-111: Line length
Expected: 100; Actual: 136
(MD013, line-length)
111-111: Ordered list item prefix
Expected: 4; Actual: 1; Style: 1/2/3
(MD029, ol-prefix)
112-112: Line length
Expected: 100; Actual: 150
(MD013, line-length)
113-113: Ordered list item prefix
Expected: 3; Actual: 1; Style: 1/2/3
(MD029, ol-prefix)
115-115: Line length
Expected: 100; Actual: 333
(MD013, line-length)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: markdown-lint
🔇 Additional comments (9)
docs/toc.md (1)
97-97: Add Testing section to TOC
The new/Testingentry correctly aligns with the addition ofdocs/Testing.md. Ensure that this path (without file extension) matches the actual document ID and that the leading slash is consistent with other entries (/CI,/Environment_Configuration, etc.).LICENSE.md (1)
23-37: Include third-party testing dependencies disclaimer
The new “Dependencies NOT included.” note and “### Third-Party Dependencies” section appropriately clarify which licenses govern testing tools. Heading levels flow correctly from the existing H2 down to H3. This aligns well with the broader licensing updates.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~33-~33: Consider removing “of” to be more concise
Context: ...le licenses (but not be bundled). While all of the source code is open-source, using some ...(ALL_OF_THE)
docs/Testing.md (1)
249-249: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Nit: Add comma after “Currently”
Insert a comma after “Currently” in the performance section:- Currently the `performance` test group contains… + Currently, the `performance` test group contains…Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~249-~249: A comma may be missing after the conjunctive/linking adverb ‘Currently’.
Context: ...ance testing aptly namedperformance. Currently theperformancetest group contains o...(SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA)
docs/CI.md (6)
3-4: Clear introductory descriptionThe new line concisely describes the CI focus for the Multicast project and integrates well under the existing
# CIheading.
9-11: Service provider overview is clearThe description for GitHub Actions and CircleCI correctly informs readers of the CI systems in use.
27-33: Section headers are well-structuredThe new “Testing in CI/CD” section and its subheading for GitHub Actions are clear and appropriately placed.
35-54: Mermaid diagrams render correctlyThe embedded mermaid graph is properly fenced and formatted. This visual aid nicely clarifies the workflow.
87-104: CircleCI mermaid diagram is properly formattedThe code fence and mermaid syntax correctly illustrate the CircleCI pipeline flow.
115-115: Closing summary is concise and clearThe wrap-up sentence effectively restates the CircleCI workflow purpose.
🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
115-115: Line length
Expected: 100; Actual: 333(MD013, line-length)
github-project-automation
bot
moved this from In progress
to Regressions
in Multicast Project
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #424 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 95.056% 95.056%
=========================================
Files 26 26
Lines 2144 2144
Branches 131 131
=========================================
Hits 2038 2038
Misses 66 66
Partials 40 40
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
|
Changes in file docs/Testing.md: * Improved markdown style
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
♻️ Duplicate comments (7)
docs/Testing.md (7)
315-316: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Use concise phrasing instead of "a lot of"
Replace "a lot of artifacts" with a more concise "many artifacts" to improve clarity.- Code coverage can leave a lot of artifacts after testing, so it is a good idea to run the `make clean` target when finished with each test run to blow-away such coverage artifacts. + Code coverage can leave many artifacts after testing, so it is a good idea to run the `make clean` target when finished with each test run to blow-away such coverage artifacts.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~315-~315: Consider using a synonym to be more concise.
Context: ...d). > [!TIP] > Code coverage can leave a lot of artifacts after testing, so it is a goo...(A_LOT_OF)
1-423: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionEnsure documentation is linted with markdownlint and languagetool
Per project guidelines, all files underdocs/must be linted withmarkdownlintandlanguagetoolto catch structural (e.g., MD022, MD025, MD029) and grammatical issues (punctuation, wording). Please run these tools ondocs/Testing.mdand address the reported violations before merging.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~10-~10: Consider removing “of” to be more concise
Context: ...plit between multiple licenses. > While all of the source-code is open-source, using some ...(ALL_OF_THE)
[style] ~20-~20: This phrase is redundant. Consider using “outside”.
Context: ...ibility or support for the testing code outside of the specified environments. > Users are...(OUTSIDE_OF)
[uncategorized] ~28-~28: The abbreviation “e.g.” (= for example) requires two periods.
Context: ...D but can also be initiated > manually (eg. in your local environment) with the bas...(E_G)
[uncategorized] ~38-~38: The abbreviation “e.g.” (= for example) requires two periods.
Context: ...rectory inside the.githubdirectory (eg..github/tools). * Unit-testing is pr...(E_G)
[uncategorized] ~73-~73: A comma may be missing after the conjunctive/linking adverb ‘Currently’.
Context: ...sh make test-mats ``` #### Categories Currently MATs are comprised of the test categori...(SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA)
[uncategorized] ~100-~100: These words/punctuation marks might seem a little out of order. For clarity and coherence, try switching them around.
Context: ...ng process, albeit an important part. In, general a test runner is exactly what it sounds...(AI_EN_LECTOR_REPLACEMENT_WORD_ORDER)
[style] ~100-~100: Consider an alternative for the overused word “exactly”.
Context: ...tant part. In, general a test runner is exactly what it sounds like, the component resp...(EXACTLY_PRECISELY)
[uncategorized] ~177-~177: A comma might be missing here.
Context: ...en Contributors During the development cycle new features will also need testing, (t...(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_PUNCTUATION_COMMA)
[uncategorized] ~196-~196: A comma might be missing here.
Context: ...ovided by the selective test runner. Of-course eventually the process leads back to th...(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_PUNCTUATION_COMMA)
[uncategorized] ~196-~196: A comma might be missing here.
Context: ...by the selective test runner. Of-course eventually the process leads back to the normal CI...(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_PUNCTUATION_COMMA)
[uncategorized] ~236-~236: A comma may be missing after the conjunctive/linking adverb ‘Currently’.
Context: ...nal fuzz testing aptly namedfuzzing. Currently thefuzzingtest group contains only ...(SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA)
[uncategorized] ~250-~250: A comma might be missing here.
Context: ...t group intended for future performance testing aptly namedperformance. Currently th...(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_PUNCTUATION_COMMA)
[uncategorized] ~250-~250: A comma may be missing after the conjunctive/linking adverb ‘Currently’.
Context: ...ance testing aptly namedperformance. Currently theperformancetest group contains o...(SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA)
[uncategorized] ~276-~276: This verb may not be in the correct tense. Consider changing the tense to fit the context better.
Context: ...overagein theextra` group's context is referring to "extra test coverage". > [!TIP] > C...(AI_EN_LECTOR_REPLACEMENT_VERB_TENSE)
[grammar] ~279-~279: The word “fall-back” is a noun. The verb is spelled with a space.
Context: ... to categorize their new test code, may fall-back to the >coveragecategory, so not to...(NOUN_VERB_CONFUSION)
[uncategorized] ~306-~306: Did you mean: “By default,”?
Context: ...``` #### Logging and Coverage testing By default logging from themulticastmodule is ...(BY_DEFAULT_COMMA)
[style] ~315-~315: Consider using a synonym to be more concise.
Context: ...d). > [!TIP] > Code coverage can leave a lot of artifacts after testing, so it is a goo...(A_LOT_OF)
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
66-66: Ordered list item prefix
Expected: 2; Actual: 1; Style: 1/2/3(MD029, ol-prefix)
🪛 GitHub Actions: Markdown Lint
[warning] 66-66: Markdownlint MD029: Ordered list item prefix incorrect (Expected: 2; Actual: 1; Style: 1/2/3).
27-29: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Standardize abbreviation "e.g.,"
Use the conventional form(e.g., ...)(two periods and a comma). Update both instances to follow this style.- manually (eg. in your local environment) + manually (e.g., in your local environment) - inside the `.github` directory (eg. `.github/tools`) + inside the `.github` directory (e.g., `.github/tools`)Also applies to: 37-38
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~28-~28: The abbreviation “e.g.” (= for example) requires two periods.
Context: ...D but can also be initiated > manually (eg. in your local environment) with the bas...(E_G)
18-21: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Simplify phrase "outside of"
Replace "outside of the specified environments" with "outside the specified environments" to reduce wordiness.- do not guarantee compatibility or support for the testing code outside of the specified environments. + do not guarantee compatibility or support for the testing code outside the specified environments.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~20-~20: This phrase is redundant. Consider using “outside”.
Context: ...ibility or support for the testing code outside of the specified environments. > Users are...(OUTSIDE_OF)
99-101: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Improve wording and punctuation in test runner description
The sentence "In, general a test runner is exactly what it sounds like, the component responsible…" is awkward. Revise to:In general, a test runner is what it sounds like: the component responsible…
- In, general a test runner is exactly what it sounds like, the component responsible + In general, a test runner is what it sounds like: the component responsible🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~100-~100: These words/punctuation marks might seem a little out of order. For clarity and coherence, try switching them around.
Context: ...ng process, albeit an important part. In, general a test runner is exactly what it sounds...(AI_EN_LECTOR_REPLACEMENT_WORD_ORDER)
[style] ~100-~100: Consider an alternative for the overused word “exactly”.
Context: ...tant part. In, general a test runner is exactly what it sounds like, the component resp...(EXACTLY_PRECISELY)
8-12: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Remove redundant "of" for conciseness
In the caution block, change "While all of the source-code" to "While all source-code" to eliminate an unnecessary word.- While all of the source-code is open-source, using some of the project test code is only possible + While all source-code is open-source, using some of the project test code is only possible🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~10-~10: Consider removing “of” to be more concise
Context: ...plit between multiple licenses. > While all of the source-code is open-source, using some ...(ALL_OF_THE)
306-307: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Add comma after introductory phrase "By default"
Insert a comma after "By default" for correct punctuation.- By default logging from the `multicast` module is ignored… + By default, logging from the `multicast` module is ignored…🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~306-~306: Did you mean: “By default,”?
Context: ...``` #### Logging and Coverage testing By default logging from themulticastmodule is ...(BY_DEFAULT_COMMA)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
docs/Testing.md(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
`docs/*`: When a project contains a `docs/` directory: 1. Consider the files in the `docs/` directory tree the core/main/in-depth documentation of the project. Also consider the...
docs/*: When a project contains adocs/directory: 1. Consider the files in thedocs/directory tree the core/main/in-depth documentation
of the project. Also consider the 'docs/**.md' files the second place to look for
project documentation after the 'README.md' file.
2. When reviewing the documentation files (e.g.docs/**.md), they should additionally
be linted with help from the toolmarkdownlint, pointing out any issues.
3. When reviewing the documentation files indocs/directory, they should additionally
be linted with help from the toollanguagetool, pointing out any issues.
docs/Testing.md
🧠 Learnings (2)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#115
File: multicast/hear.py:180-180
Timestamp: 2024-09-19T03:43:24.037Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to re-use already loaded modules to keep memory overhead low when possible.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#115
File: multicast/hear.py:180-180
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:30.537Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to re-use already loaded modules to keep memory overhead low when possible.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#415
File: .github/AI_USAGE_POLICY.md:32-34
Timestamp: 2025-05-25T21:33:32.335Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to maintain existing documentation style and wording in policy documents, declining stylistic refinements when the current text is functional, indicating a preference for stability over cosmetic improvements in documentation.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#379
File: .ast-grep/utils/python/structure/multicast-mtool-subclass-definitions/undecorated_function_definition.yml:8-12
Timestamp: 2025-04-23T04:07:24.393Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall follows the "Avoid Hasty Abstraction" principle, being cautious about changes that might introduce unnecessary abstractions or alter existing behavior, particularly in configuration files like ast-grep rule definitions.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#139
File: tests/test_fuzz.py:73-73
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:27.171Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers not to introduce new dependencies into the codebase when writing test functions.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#402
File: .github/actions/setup-py-reqs/action.yml:79-85
Timestamp: 2025-05-17T02:33:33.421Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to maintain the original structure of conditional statements when fixing logic errors in GitHub Action YAML files, and relies on environment variables with proper defaults rather than dynamic fallbacks when handling input parameters.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#420
File: docs/CI.md:445-447
Timestamp: 2025-05-27T04:12:39.221Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to maintain intentional wording choices in documentation even when automated grammar tools suggest changes, indicating a preference for preserving deliberate stylistic decisions over automated corrections.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#235
File: .github/workflows/makefile-lint.yml:41-52
Timestamp: 2024-12-06T08:21:21.876Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to suppress errors in `apt-get install` commands when individual checks of the installed packages are performed afterwards, to allow for more granular error handling.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#118
File: tests/check_pip:92-197
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:30.537Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers defining functions before they are called in Bash scripts to avoid errors due to Bash's sequential interpretation.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#392
File: multicast/send.py:312-320
Timestamp: 2025-05-05T20:10:48.364Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers simpler implementations that maintain a component's single responsibility (like argparse), even when it means not explicitly handling all edge cases such as mutual exclusivity of command-line arguments.
docs/Testing.md (1)
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2024-12-17T23:18:31.022Z
Learning: In the multicast project's test framework, organize tests into distinct groups: Minimum Acceptance Tests (MATs), Extra Tests, Fuzzing Tests, and Performance Tests. MATs should include basic tests, doctests, SAY tests (multicast/send.py), HEAR tests (multicast/recv.py and multicast/hear.py), usage tests (__main__.py), build tests, and bootstrap tests.
🪛 LanguageTool
docs/Testing.md
[style] ~10-~10: Consider removing “of” to be more concise
Context: ...plit between multiple licenses. > While all of the source-code is open-source, using some ...
(ALL_OF_THE)
[style] ~20-~20: This phrase is redundant. Consider using “outside”.
Context: ...ibility or support for the testing code outside of the specified environments. > Users are...
(OUTSIDE_OF)
[uncategorized] ~28-~28: The abbreviation “e.g.” (= for example) requires two periods.
Context: ...D but can also be initiated > manually (eg. in your local environment) with the bas...
(E_G)
[uncategorized] ~38-~38: The abbreviation “e.g.” (= for example) requires two periods.
Context: ...rectory inside the .github directory (eg. .github/tools). * Unit-testing is pr...
(E_G)
[uncategorized] ~73-~73: A comma may be missing after the conjunctive/linking adverb ‘Currently’.
Context: ...sh make test-mats ``` #### Categories Currently MATs are comprised of the test categori...
(SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA)
[uncategorized] ~100-~100: These words/punctuation marks might seem a little out of order. For clarity and coherence, try switching them around.
Context: ...ng process, albeit an important part. In, general a test runner is exactly what it sounds...
(AI_EN_LECTOR_REPLACEMENT_WORD_ORDER)
[style] ~100-~100: Consider an alternative for the overused word “exactly”.
Context: ...tant part. In, general a test runner is exactly what it sounds like, the component resp...
(EXACTLY_PRECISELY)
[uncategorized] ~177-~177: A comma might be missing here.
Context: ...en Contributors During the development cycle new features will also need testing, (t...
(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_PUNCTUATION_COMMA)
[uncategorized] ~196-~196: A comma might be missing here.
Context: ...ovided by the selective test runner. Of-course eventually the process leads back to th...
(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_PUNCTUATION_COMMA)
[uncategorized] ~196-~196: A comma might be missing here.
Context: ...by the selective test runner. Of-course eventually the process leads back to the normal CI...
(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_PUNCTUATION_COMMA)
[uncategorized] ~236-~236: A comma may be missing after the conjunctive/linking adverb ‘Currently’.
Context: ...nal fuzz testing aptly named fuzzing. Currently the fuzzing test group contains only ...
(SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA)
[uncategorized] ~250-~250: A comma might be missing here.
Context: ...t group intended for future performance testing aptly named performance. Currently th...
(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_PUNCTUATION_COMMA)
[uncategorized] ~250-~250: A comma may be missing after the conjunctive/linking adverb ‘Currently’.
Context: ...ance testing aptly named performance. Currently the performance test group contains o...
(SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA)
[uncategorized] ~276-~276: This verb may not be in the correct tense. Consider changing the tense to fit the context better.
Context: ...overagein theextra` group's context is referring to "extra test coverage". > [!TIP] > C...
(AI_EN_LECTOR_REPLACEMENT_VERB_TENSE)
[grammar] ~279-~279: The word “fall-back” is a noun. The verb is spelled with a space.
Context: ... to categorize their new test code, may fall-back to the > coverage category, so not to...
(NOUN_VERB_CONFUSION)
[uncategorized] ~306-~306: Did you mean: “By default,”?
Context: ...``` #### Logging and Coverage testing By default logging from the multicast module is ...
(BY_DEFAULT_COMMA)
[style] ~315-~315: Consider using a synonym to be more concise.
Context: ...d). > [!TIP] > Code coverage can leave a lot of artifacts after testing, so it is a goo...
(A_LOT_OF)
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
docs/Testing.md
66-66: Ordered list item prefix
Expected: 2; Actual: 1; Style: 1/2/3
(MD029, ol-prefix)
🪛 GitHub Actions: Markdown Lint
docs/Testing.md
[warning] 66-66: Markdownlint MD029: Ordered list item prefix incorrect (Expected: 2; Actual: 1; Style: 1/2/3).
…WIP #411 -) Changes in file docs/Testing.md: * Many style fixes * related work Changes in file docs/utils.py: * added gists to url list
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
docs/utils.py (1)
275-279: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionEnsure robust domain validation by matching hostname instead of netloc.
Current code checks
parsed_url.netlocagainstURL_ALLOWED_NETLOCS, which will fail for URLs including a port (e.g.,gist.github.com:443). Useparsed_url.hostnameto match the domain only:- if parsed_url.netloc not in URL_ALLOWED_NETLOCS: - raise ValueError(INVALID_DOMAIN_ERROR) + if parsed_url.hostname not in URL_ALLOWED_NETLOCS: + raise ValueError(INVALID_DOMAIN_ERROR)
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
docs/Testing.md (1)
315-315: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Use precise wording for coverage artifacts.
Following project preference for concise and formal language, replace “a lot of artifacts” with “numerous artifacts”:
- > Code coverage can leave a lot of artifacts after testing, so it is a good idea to run the `make clean` target... + > Code coverage can leave numerous artifacts after testing, so it is a good idea to run the `make clean` target...🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~315-~315: Consider using a synonym to be more concise.
Context: ...d). > [!TIP] > Code coverage can leave a lot of artifacts after testing, so it is a goo...(A_LOT_OF)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
docs/Testing.md(1 hunks)docs/utils.py(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
`**/*.py`: When reviewing **Python** code for this project: 1. Prioritize portability over clarity, especially when dealing with cross-Python compatibility. However, with the pr...
**/*.py: When reviewing Python code for this project: 1. Prioritize portability over clarity, especially when dealing with cross-Python
compatibility. However, with the priority in mind, do still consider improvements to
clarity when relevant.
2. As a general guideline, consider the code style advocated in the PEP 8 standard
(excluding the use of spaces for indentation) and evaluate suggested changes for code
style compliance.
3. As a style convention, consider the code style advocated in
CEP-8
and evaluate suggested changes for code style compliance.
4. As a general guideline, try to provide any relevant, official, and supporting
documentation links to any tool's suggestions in review comments. This guideline is
important for posterity.
5. As a general rule, undocumented function definitions and class definitions in the
project's Python code are assumed incomplete. Please consider suggesting a short
summary of the code for any of these incomplete definitions as docstrings when
reviewing. All documentation including docstrings in the project are to align with
the guidelines set by
CEP-7.
6. Verify Flake8's configuration file is located at ".flake8.ini". Flake8 is run
automaticly by theflake8-cqGHA used by the.github/workflows/flake8.ymlworkflow.
7. Verify alignment of any new changes, with the code style advocated in
CEP-8,
pointing out any introduced deviations.
docs/utils.py
`docs/*`: When a project contains a `docs/` directory: 1. Consider the files in the `docs/` directory tree the core/main/in-depth documentation of the project. Also consider the...
docs/*: When a project contains adocs/directory: 1. Consider the files in thedocs/directory tree the core/main/in-depth documentation
of the project. Also consider the 'docs/**.md' files the second place to look for
project documentation after the 'README.md' file.
2. When reviewing the documentation files (e.g.docs/**.md), they should additionally
be linted with help from the toolmarkdownlint, pointing out any issues.
3. When reviewing the documentation files indocs/directory, they should additionally
be linted with help from the toollanguagetool, pointing out any issues.
docs/utils.pydocs/Testing.md
🧠 Learnings (2)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#115
File: multicast/hear.py:180-180
Timestamp: 2024-09-19T03:43:24.037Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to re-use already loaded modules to keep memory overhead low when possible.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#115
File: multicast/hear.py:180-180
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:30.537Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to re-use already loaded modules to keep memory overhead low when possible.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#415
File: .github/AI_USAGE_POLICY.md:32-34
Timestamp: 2025-05-25T21:33:32.335Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to maintain existing documentation style and wording in policy documents, declining stylistic refinements when the current text is functional, indicating a preference for stability over cosmetic improvements in documentation.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#379
File: .ast-grep/utils/python/structure/multicast-mtool-subclass-definitions/undecorated_function_definition.yml:8-12
Timestamp: 2025-04-23T04:07:24.393Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall follows the "Avoid Hasty Abstraction" principle, being cautious about changes that might introduce unnecessary abstractions or alter existing behavior, particularly in configuration files like ast-grep rule definitions.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#139
File: tests/test_fuzz.py:73-73
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:27.171Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers not to introduce new dependencies into the codebase when writing test functions.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#402
File: .github/actions/setup-py-reqs/action.yml:79-85
Timestamp: 2025-05-17T02:33:33.421Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to maintain the original structure of conditional statements when fixing logic errors in GitHub Action YAML files, and relies on environment variables with proper defaults rather than dynamic fallbacks when handling input parameters.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#420
File: docs/CI.md:445-447
Timestamp: 2025-05-27T04:12:39.221Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to maintain intentional wording choices in documentation even when automated grammar tools suggest changes, indicating a preference for preserving deliberate stylistic decisions over automated corrections.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#235
File: .github/workflows/makefile-lint.yml:41-52
Timestamp: 2024-12-06T08:21:21.876Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to suppress errors in `apt-get install` commands when individual checks of the installed packages are performed afterwards, to allow for more granular error handling.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#118
File: tests/check_pip:92-197
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:30.537Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers defining functions before they are called in Bash scripts to avoid errors due to Bash's sequential interpretation.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#392
File: multicast/send.py:312-320
Timestamp: 2025-05-05T20:10:48.364Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers simpler implementations that maintain a component's single responsibility (like argparse), even when it means not explicitly handling all edge cases such as mutual exclusivity of command-line arguments.
docs/Testing.md (2)
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#415
File: .github/AI_USAGE_POLICY.md:32-34
Timestamp: 2025-05-25T21:33:32.335Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to maintain existing documentation style and wording in policy documents, declining stylistic refinements when the current text is functional, indicating a preference for stability over cosmetic improvements in documentation.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2024-12-17T23:18:31.022Z
Learning: In the multicast project's test framework, organize tests into distinct groups: Minimum Acceptance Tests (MATs), Extra Tests, Fuzzing Tests, and Performance Tests. MATs should include basic tests, doctests, SAY tests (multicast/send.py), HEAR tests (multicast/recv.py and multicast/hear.py), usage tests (__main__.py), build tests, and bootstrap tests.
🪛 LanguageTool
docs/Testing.md
[style] ~10-~10: Consider removing “of” to be more concise
Context: ...plit between multiple licenses. > While all of the source-code is open-source, using some ...
(ALL_OF_THE)
[style] ~20-~20: This phrase is redundant. Consider using “outside”.
Context: ...ibility or support for the testing code outside of the specified environments. > Users are...
(OUTSIDE_OF)
[style] ~41-~41: You’ve already used the word ‘also’ once in your sentence, so using it again may be redundant.
Context: ...are also located in .github/tools * Also see CI Documentation * Also see ...
(REDUNDANT_FILLER)
[style] ~42-~42: You’ve already used the word ‘Also’ once in your sentence, so using it again may be redundant.
Context: ... Also see CI Documentation * Also see [CEP-5](https://gist.github.com/reactiv...
(REDUNDANT_FILLER)
[uncategorized] ~177-~177: A comma might be missing here.
Context: ...en Contributors During the development cycle new features will also need testing, (t...
(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_PUNCTUATION_COMMA)
[uncategorized] ~196-~196: A comma might be missing here.
Context: ...ovided by the selective test runner. Of-course eventually the process leads back to th...
(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_PUNCTUATION_COMMA)
[uncategorized] ~196-~196: A comma might be missing here.
Context: ...by the selective test runner. Of-course eventually the process leads back to the normal CI...
(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_PUNCTUATION_COMMA)
[uncategorized] ~250-~250: A comma might be missing here.
Context: ...t group intended for future performance testing aptly named performance. Currently th...
(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_PUNCTUATION_COMMA)
[uncategorized] ~250-~250: A comma may be missing after the conjunctive/linking adverb ‘Currently’.
Context: ...ance testing aptly named performance. Currently the performance test group contains o...
(SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA)
[uncategorized] ~276-~276: This verb may not be in the correct tense. Consider changing the tense to fit the context better.
Context: ...overagein theextra` group's context is referring to "extra test coverage". > [!TIP] > C...
(AI_EN_LECTOR_REPLACEMENT_VERB_TENSE)
[style] ~315-~315: Consider using a synonym to be more concise.
Context: ...d). > [!TIP] > Code coverage can leave a lot of artifacts after testing, so it is a goo...
(A_LOT_OF)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: CI-MATs
- GitHub Check: makefile-lint
🔇 Additional comments (1)
docs/utils.py (1)
39-41: Approve addition of gist.github.com to allowed URL domains.Whitelisting "gist.github.com" enables embedding gists in documentation and tests while preserving secure URL validation. The update aligns with broader PR objectives.
Changes in file docs/Testing.md: * added missing comma * related work
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 9
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
docs/Testing.md(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
`docs/*`: When a project contains a `docs/` directory: 1. Consider the files in the `docs/` directory tree the core/main/in-depth documentation of the project. Also consider the...
docs/*: When a project contains adocs/directory: 1. Consider the files in thedocs/directory tree the core/main/in-depth documentation
of the project. Also consider the 'docs/**.md' files the second place to look for
project documentation after the 'README.md' file.
2. When reviewing the documentation files (e.g.docs/**.md), they should additionally
be linted with help from the toolmarkdownlint, pointing out any issues.
3. When reviewing the documentation files indocs/directory, they should additionally
be linted with help from the toollanguagetool, pointing out any issues.
docs/Testing.md
🧠 Learnings (2)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#115
File: multicast/hear.py:180-180
Timestamp: 2024-09-19T03:43:24.037Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to re-use already loaded modules to keep memory overhead low when possible.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#115
File: multicast/hear.py:180-180
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:30.537Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to re-use already loaded modules to keep memory overhead low when possible.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#415
File: .github/AI_USAGE_POLICY.md:32-34
Timestamp: 2025-05-25T21:33:32.335Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to maintain existing documentation style and wording in policy documents, declining stylistic refinements when the current text is functional, indicating a preference for stability over cosmetic improvements in documentation.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#379
File: .ast-grep/utils/python/structure/multicast-mtool-subclass-definitions/undecorated_function_definition.yml:8-12
Timestamp: 2025-04-23T04:07:24.393Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall follows the "Avoid Hasty Abstraction" principle, being cautious about changes that might introduce unnecessary abstractions or alter existing behavior, particularly in configuration files like ast-grep rule definitions.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#139
File: tests/test_fuzz.py:73-73
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:27.171Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers not to introduce new dependencies into the codebase when writing test functions.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#402
File: .github/actions/setup-py-reqs/action.yml:79-85
Timestamp: 2025-05-17T02:33:33.421Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to maintain the original structure of conditional statements when fixing logic errors in GitHub Action YAML files, and relies on environment variables with proper defaults rather than dynamic fallbacks when handling input parameters.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#420
File: docs/CI.md:445-447
Timestamp: 2025-05-27T04:12:39.221Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to maintain intentional wording choices in documentation even when automated grammar tools suggest changes, indicating a preference for preserving deliberate stylistic decisions over automated corrections.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#235
File: .github/workflows/makefile-lint.yml:41-52
Timestamp: 2024-12-06T08:21:21.876Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to suppress errors in `apt-get install` commands when individual checks of the installed packages are performed afterwards, to allow for more granular error handling.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#118
File: tests/check_pip:92-197
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:30.537Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers defining functions before they are called in Bash scripts to avoid errors due to Bash's sequential interpretation.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#392
File: multicast/send.py:312-320
Timestamp: 2025-05-05T20:10:48.364Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers simpler implementations that maintain a component's single responsibility (like argparse), even when it means not explicitly handling all edge cases such as mutual exclusivity of command-line arguments.
docs/Testing.md (3)
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#415
File: .github/AI_USAGE_POLICY.md:32-34
Timestamp: 2025-05-25T21:33:32.335Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to maintain existing documentation style and wording in policy documents, declining stylistic refinements when the current text is functional, indicating a preference for stability over cosmetic improvements in documentation.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#420
File: docs/CI.md:445-447
Timestamp: 2025-05-27T04:12:39.221Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to maintain intentional wording choices in documentation even when automated grammar tools suggest changes, indicating a preference for preserving deliberate stylistic decisions over automated corrections.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#0
File: :0-0
Timestamp: 2024-12-17T23:18:31.022Z
Learning: In the multicast project's test framework, organize tests into distinct groups: Minimum Acceptance Tests (MATs), Extra Tests, Fuzzing Tests, and Performance Tests. MATs should include basic tests, doctests, SAY tests (multicast/send.py), HEAR tests (multicast/recv.py and multicast/hear.py), usage tests (__main__.py), build tests, and bootstrap tests.
🪛 LanguageTool
docs/Testing.md
[style] ~10-~10: Consider removing “of” to be more concise
Context: ...plit between multiple licenses. > While all of the source-code is open-source, using some ...
(ALL_OF_THE)
[style] ~20-~20: This phrase is redundant. Consider using “outside”.
Context: ...ibility or support for the testing code outside of the specified environments. > Users are...
(OUTSIDE_OF)
[style] ~41-~41: You’ve already used the word ‘also’ once in your sentence, so using it again may be redundant.
Context: ...are also located in .github/tools * Also see CI Documentation * Also see ...
(REDUNDANT_FILLER)
[style] ~42-~42: You’ve already used the word ‘Also’ once in your sentence, so using it again may be redundant.
Context: ... Also see CI Documentation * Also see [CEP-5](https://gist.github.com/reactiv...
(REDUNDANT_FILLER)
[uncategorized] ~177-~177: A comma might be missing here.
Context: ...en Contributors During the development cycle new features will also need testing, (t...
(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_PUNCTUATION_COMMA)
[uncategorized] ~196-~196: A comma might be missing here.
Context: ...ovided by the selective test runner. Of-course eventually the process leads back to th...
(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_PUNCTUATION_COMMA)
[uncategorized] ~196-~196: A comma might be missing here.
Context: ...by the selective test runner. Of-course eventually the process leads back to the normal CI...
(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_PUNCTUATION_COMMA)
[uncategorized] ~250-~250: A comma might be missing here.
Context: ...t group intended for future performance testing aptly named performance. Currently, t...
(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_PUNCTUATION_COMMA)
[uncategorized] ~276-~276: This verb may not be in the correct tense. Consider changing the tense to fit the context better.
Context: ...overagein theextra` group's context is referring to "extra test coverage". > [!TIP] > C...
(AI_EN_LECTOR_REPLACEMENT_VERB_TENSE)
[style] ~315-~315: Consider using a synonym to be more concise.
Context: ...d). > [!TIP] > Code coverage can leave a lot of artifacts after testing, so it is a goo...
(A_LOT_OF)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
- GitHub Check: CI-MATs
- GitHub Check: markdown-lint
- GitHub Check: makefile-lint
…411 -) Changes in file docs/Testing.md: * style changes * re-worded some * related changes
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
♻️ Duplicate comments (3)
docs/Testing.md (3)
37-43: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Standardize “See also” phrasing
Using “Also see” twice is repetitive. Recommend switching to “See also” for both entries:- * Also see [CI Documentation](CI.md) - * Also see [CEP-5](…) + * See also [CI Documentation](CI.md) + * See also [CEP-5](…)🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~41-~41: You’ve already used the word ‘also’ once in your sentence, so using it again may be redundant.
Context: ...are also located in.github/tools* Also see CI Documentation * Also see ...(REDUNDANT_FILLER)
[style] ~42-~42: You’ve already used the word ‘Also’ once in your sentence, so using it again may be redundant.
Context: ... Also see CI Documentation * Also see [CEP-5](https://gist.github.com/reactiv...(REDUNDANT_FILLER)
233-235: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Capitalize “Hypothesis Python”
Treat these as proper nouns:- copy of the hypothesis python module. + copy of the Hypothesis Python module.
263-266: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Remove unnecessary commas in “extra” tests description
Streamline the phrasing:- some extra tests intended for additional, but non-acceptance, testing + some extra tests intended for additional but non-acceptance testing
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
docs/Testing.md(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
`docs/*`: When a project contains a `docs/` directory: 1. Consider the files in the `docs/` directory tree the core/main/in-depth documentation of the project. Also consider the...
docs/*: When a project contains adocs/directory: 1. Consider the files in thedocs/directory tree the core/main/in-depth documentation
of the project. Also consider the 'docs/**.md' files the second place to look for
project documentation after the 'README.md' file.
2. When reviewing the documentation files (e.g.docs/**.md), they should additionally
be linted with help from the toolmarkdownlint, pointing out any issues.
3. When reviewing the documentation files indocs/directory, they should additionally
be linted with help from the toollanguagetool, pointing out any issues.
docs/Testing.md
🧠 Learnings (2)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#115
File: multicast/hear.py:180-180
Timestamp: 2024-09-19T03:43:24.037Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to re-use already loaded modules to keep memory overhead low when possible.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#115
File: multicast/hear.py:180-180
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:30.537Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to re-use already loaded modules to keep memory overhead low when possible.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#415
File: .github/AI_USAGE_POLICY.md:32-34
Timestamp: 2025-05-25T21:33:32.335Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to maintain existing documentation style and wording in policy documents, declining stylistic refinements when the current text is functional, indicating a preference for stability over cosmetic improvements in documentation.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#379
File: .ast-grep/utils/python/structure/multicast-mtool-subclass-definitions/undecorated_function_definition.yml:8-12
Timestamp: 2025-04-23T04:07:24.393Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall follows the "Avoid Hasty Abstraction" principle, being cautious about changes that might introduce unnecessary abstractions or alter existing behavior, particularly in configuration files like ast-grep rule definitions.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#139
File: tests/test_fuzz.py:73-73
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:27.171Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers not to introduce new dependencies into the codebase when writing test functions.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#402
File: .github/actions/setup-py-reqs/action.yml:79-85
Timestamp: 2025-05-17T02:33:33.421Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to maintain the original structure of conditional statements when fixing logic errors in GitHub Action YAML files, and relies on environment variables with proper defaults rather than dynamic fallbacks when handling input parameters.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#420
File: docs/CI.md:445-447
Timestamp: 2025-05-27T04:12:39.221Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to maintain intentional wording choices in documentation even when automated grammar tools suggest changes, indicating a preference for preserving deliberate stylistic decisions over automated corrections.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#235
File: .github/workflows/makefile-lint.yml:41-52
Timestamp: 2024-12-06T08:21:21.876Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to suppress errors in `apt-get install` commands when individual checks of the installed packages are performed afterwards, to allow for more granular error handling.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#118
File: tests/check_pip:92-197
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:30.537Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers defining functions before they are called in Bash scripts to avoid errors due to Bash's sequential interpretation.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#392
File: multicast/send.py:312-320
Timestamp: 2025-05-05T20:10:48.364Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers simpler implementations that maintain a component's single responsibility (like argparse), even when it means not explicitly handling all edge cases such as mutual exclusivity of command-line arguments.
docs/Testing.md (1)
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#415
File: .github/AI_USAGE_POLICY.md:32-34
Timestamp: 2025-05-25T21:33:32.335Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to maintain existing documentation style and wording in policy documents, declining stylistic refinements when the current text is functional, indicating a preference for stability over cosmetic improvements in documentation.
🪛 LanguageTool
docs/Testing.md
[style] ~10-~10: Consider removing “of” to be more concise
Context: ...plit between multiple licenses. > While all of the source-code is open-source, using some ...
(ALL_OF_THE)
[style] ~20-~20: This phrase is redundant. Consider using “outside”.
Context: ...ibility or support for the testing code outside of the specified environments. > Users are...
(OUTSIDE_OF)
[style] ~41-~41: You’ve already used the word ‘also’ once in your sentence, so using it again may be redundant.
Context: ...are also located in .github/tools * Also see CI Documentation * Also see ...
(REDUNDANT_FILLER)
[style] ~42-~42: You’ve already used the word ‘Also’ once in your sentence, so using it again may be redundant.
Context: ... Also see CI Documentation * Also see [CEP-5](https://gist.github.com/reactiv...
(REDUNDANT_FILLER)
[uncategorized] ~177-~177: A comma might be missing here.
Context: ...en Contributors During the development cycle new features will also need testing, (t...
(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_PUNCTUATION_COMMA)
[uncategorized] ~237-~237: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...a separate test group for optional fuzz testing aptly named fuzzing. Currently, the `...
(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
[uncategorized] ~251-~251: A comma might be missing here.
Context: ...t group intended for future performance testing aptly named performance. Currently, t...
(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_PUNCTUATION_COMMA)
[uncategorized] ~277-~277: This verb may not be in the correct tense. Consider changing the tense to fit the context better.
Context: ...overagein theextra` group's context is referring to "extra test coverage". > [!TIP] > C...
(AI_EN_LECTOR_REPLACEMENT_VERB_TENSE)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: CI-MATs
🔇 Additional comments (1)
docs/Testing.md (1)
397-398: Heading stability
Per project preference, retain the existing “#### As a Dependency, Testing” heading unchanged.
Changes in file LICENSE.md: * minor changes to style Changes in file docs/Testing.md: * style changes * related work
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
♻️ Duplicate comments (3)
docs/Testing.md (3)
72-76: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Prefer “comprise” over “are comprised of”
A more direct phrasing would be:Currently, MATs comprise the test categories `bootstrap`, `basic`, `build`, `doctests`, `say`, `hear`, and `usage`.
26-29: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Split the IMPORTANT block for readability
The single long sentence covers CI/CD, manual invocation, and cleanup. Consider breaking it into two sentences or converting it into a small bullet list to clarify each action step.
40-43: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Standardize “See also” phrasing
Using “Also see” twice feels repetitive. Consider updating to:- * Also see [CI Documentation](CI.md) - * Also see [CEP-5](https://gist.github.com/…) + * See also [CI Documentation](CI.md) + * See also [CEP-5](https://gist.github.com/…)🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~41-~41: You’ve already used the word ‘also’ once in your sentence, so using it again may be redundant.
Context: ...are also located in.github/tools* Also see CI Documentation * Also see ...(REDUNDANT_FILLER)
[style] ~42-~42: You’ve already used the word ‘Also’ once in your sentence, so using it again may be redundant.
Context: ... Also see CI Documentation * Also see [CEP-5](https://gist.github.com/reactiv...(REDUNDANT_FILLER)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
LICENSE.md(1 hunks)docs/Testing.md(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
`docs/*`: When a project contains a `docs/` directory: 1. Consider the files in the `docs/` directory tree the core/main/in-depth documentation of the project. Also consider the...
docs/*: When a project contains adocs/directory: 1. Consider the files in thedocs/directory tree the core/main/in-depth documentation
of the project. Also consider the 'docs/**.md' files the second place to look for
project documentation after the 'README.md' file.
2. When reviewing the documentation files (e.g.docs/**.md), they should additionally
be linted with help from the toolmarkdownlint, pointing out any issues.
3. When reviewing the documentation files indocs/directory, they should additionally
be linted with help from the toollanguagetool, pointing out any issues.
docs/Testing.md
🧠 Learnings (2)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#115
File: multicast/hear.py:180-180
Timestamp: 2024-09-19T03:43:24.037Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to re-use already loaded modules to keep memory overhead low when possible.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#115
File: multicast/hear.py:180-180
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:30.537Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to re-use already loaded modules to keep memory overhead low when possible.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#415
File: .github/AI_USAGE_POLICY.md:32-34
Timestamp: 2025-05-25T21:33:32.335Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to maintain existing documentation style and wording in policy documents, declining stylistic refinements when the current text is functional, indicating a preference for stability over cosmetic improvements in documentation.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#379
File: .ast-grep/utils/python/structure/multicast-mtool-subclass-definitions/undecorated_function_definition.yml:8-12
Timestamp: 2025-04-23T04:07:24.393Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall follows the "Avoid Hasty Abstraction" principle, being cautious about changes that might introduce unnecessary abstractions or alter existing behavior, particularly in configuration files like ast-grep rule definitions.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#139
File: tests/test_fuzz.py:73-73
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:27.171Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers not to introduce new dependencies into the codebase when writing test functions.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#402
File: .github/actions/setup-py-reqs/action.yml:79-85
Timestamp: 2025-05-17T02:33:33.421Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to maintain the original structure of conditional statements when fixing logic errors in GitHub Action YAML files, and relies on environment variables with proper defaults rather than dynamic fallbacks when handling input parameters.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#420
File: docs/CI.md:445-447
Timestamp: 2025-05-27T04:12:39.221Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to maintain intentional wording choices in documentation even when automated grammar tools suggest changes, indicating a preference for preserving deliberate stylistic decisions over automated corrections.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#235
File: .github/workflows/makefile-lint.yml:41-52
Timestamp: 2024-12-06T08:21:21.876Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to suppress errors in `apt-get install` commands when individual checks of the installed packages are performed afterwards, to allow for more granular error handling.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#118
File: tests/check_pip:92-197
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:59:30.537Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers defining functions before they are called in Bash scripts to avoid errors due to Bash's sequential interpretation.
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: reactive-firewall/multicast#392
File: multicast/send.py:312-320
Timestamp: 2025-05-05T20:10:48.364Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers simpler implementations that maintain a component's single responsibility (like argparse), even when it means not explicitly handling all edge cases such as mutual exclusivity of command-line arguments.
docs/Testing.md (1)
<retrieved_learning>
Learnt from: reactive-firewall
PR: #415
File: .github/AI_USAGE_POLICY.md:32-34
Timestamp: 2025-05-25T21:33:32.335Z
Learning: Reactive-firewall prefers to maintain existing documentation style and wording in policy documents, declining stylistic refinements when the current text is functional, indicating a preference for stability over cosmetic improvements in documentation.
</retrieved_learning>
🪛 LanguageTool
LICENSE.md
[style] ~33-~33: Consider removing “of” to be more concise
Context: ...icenses (but may not be bundled). While all of the source code is open-source, using some ...
(ALL_OF_THE)
docs/Testing.md
[style] ~20-~20: This phrase is redundant. Consider using “outside”.
Context: ...ibility or support for the testing code outside of the specified environments. > Users are...
(OUTSIDE_OF)
[style] ~41-~41: You’ve already used the word ‘also’ once in your sentence, so using it again may be redundant.
Context: ...are also located in .github/tools * Also see CI Documentation * Also see ...
(REDUNDANT_FILLER)
[style] ~42-~42: You’ve already used the word ‘Also’ once in your sentence, so using it again may be redundant.
Context: ... Also see CI Documentation * Also see [CEP-5](https://gist.github.com/reactiv...
(REDUNDANT_FILLER)
[uncategorized] ~251-~251: A comma might be missing here.
Context: ...t group intended for future performance testing aptly named performance. Currently, t...
(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_PUNCTUATION_COMMA)
[uncategorized] ~277-~277: This verb may not be in the correct tense. Consider changing the tense to fit the context better.
Context: ...overagein theextra` group's context is referring to "extra test coverage". > [!TIP] > C...
(AI_EN_LECTOR_REPLACEMENT_VERB_TENSE)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: CI-MATs
- GitHub Check: markdown-lint
🔇 Additional comments (5)
LICENSE.md (4)
27-35: Approve description of excluded licenses.The new "Excluded Licenses" section clearly outlines the scope of third-party testing dependencies and their licensing constraints. The explanation is accurate and well-structured.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~33-~33: Consider removing “of” to be more concise
Context: ...icenses (but may not be bundled). While all of the source code is open-source, using some ...(ALL_OF_THE)
39-45: Approve CI/CD licensing disclaimer.The note on GNU-licensed CI/CD tools and the "batteries not included" disclaimer is informative and aligns with the project's legal guidance.
46-50: Approve compliance responsibility statement.The statement clarifying user responsibility for license compliance and acknowledging separate copyright ownership is clear.
37-38:✅ Verification successful
Verify existence of referenced files.
Ensure that the listed files (
requirements.txt,docs/requirements.txt,tests/requirements.txt) are present and up-to-date in the repository.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check that the referenced files exist for f in requirements.txt docs/requirements.txt tests/requirements.txt; do if [ ! -f "$f" ]; then echo "Error: Missing $f" exit 1 fi done echo "All referenced files are present."Length of output: 408
All referenced files are present
Verified that
requirements.txt,docs/requirements.txt, andtests/requirements.txtexist in the repository. No further action required.docs/Testing.md (1)
1-420: Lint this document with markdownlint and LanguageTool
Per project guidelines, please runmarkdownlintandlanguagetoolondocs/Testing.mdto catch any remaining structural or grammatical issues.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~20-~20: This phrase is redundant. Consider using “outside”.
Context: ...ibility or support for the testing code outside of the specified environments. > Users are...(OUTSIDE_OF)
[style] ~41-~41: You’ve already used the word ‘also’ once in your sentence, so using it again may be redundant.
Context: ...are also located in.github/tools* Also see CI Documentation * Also see ...(REDUNDANT_FILLER)
[style] ~42-~42: You’ve already used the word ‘Also’ once in your sentence, so using it again may be redundant.
Context: ... Also see CI Documentation * Also see [CEP-5](https://gist.github.com/reactiv...(REDUNDANT_FILLER)
[uncategorized] ~251-~251: A comma might be missing here.
Context: ...t group intended for future performance testing aptly namedperformance. Currently, t...(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_PUNCTUATION_COMMA)
[uncategorized] ~277-~277: This verb may not be in the correct tense. Consider changing the tense to fit the context better.
Context: ...overagein theextra` group's context is referring to "extra test coverage". > [!TIP] > C...(AI_EN_LECTOR_REPLACEMENT_VERB_TENSE)
github-project-automation
bot
moved this from Regressions
to Resolved
in Multicast Project
Patch Notes
Impacted GHI
Related PR/MRs
docs/CI.mddocumentation are covered in a separate PR Patch CI/CD Documentation #420 and will supersede changes todocs/CI.mdfrom this PR Feature add test documentation 411 #424Summary by CodeRabbit