Skip to content

Update MCAD/CodeFlare documentation to improve usability #1327

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
2 tasks done
anishasthana opened this issue Aug 14, 2023 · 2 comments · Fixed by #1373
Closed
2 tasks done

Update MCAD/CodeFlare documentation to improve usability #1327

anishasthana opened this issue Aug 14, 2023 · 2 comments · Fixed by #1373
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@anishasthana
Copy link
Contributor

Search before asking

  • I had searched in the issues and found no similar feature requirement.

Description

The MCAD documentation for usage alongside KubeRay[1] is quite old and hard to follow. We should update this document to make it easier to follow and bring it up to date with the latest in the CodeFlare ecosystem.

[1] https://github.com/ray-project/kuberay/blob/master/docs/guidance/kuberay-with-MCAD.md

Use case

No response

Related issues

No response

Are you willing to submit a PR?

  • Yes I am willing to submit a PR!
@anishasthana anishasthana added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 14, 2023
@anishasthana
Copy link
Contributor Author

cc @kevin85421 can you assign this to me?

@anishasthana anishasthana changed the title Update MCAD/CodeFlare documentaion Update MCAD/CodeFlare documentation Aug 14, 2023
@anishasthana anishasthana changed the title Update MCAD/CodeFlare documentation Update MCAD/CodeFlare documentation to improve usability Aug 14, 2023
@tedhtchang
Copy link
Contributor

@anishasthana Could you also take a look this comment to see if it can be addressed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants