Skip to content

Property Summary Extension (#413) #416

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 8 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

m-mohr
Copy link
Collaborator

@m-mohr m-mohr commented Mar 5, 2019

In openEO we need to list also the non-common fields in Collections, i.e. all properties that are available in the Items but have different values. We don't necessarily need to list the actual values (or extents), but we need to inform the user what he can query against. This is probably similar to what we plan to add for the assets as "asset definition" or "asset schema". See #413 for more information.

Here's the extension as PR.

Does somebody have a better name? Summary Extension? ...?

@mojodna
Copy link
Collaborator

mojodna commented Mar 19, 2019

I'm also having trouble with the name...

"Property Summary Extension" feels good to me, as it's summarizing the potential values that properties may have.

@mojodna mojodna changed the title Non-Common Properties Extension (#413) Property Summary Extension (#413) Mar 25, 2019
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
# Non-Common Properties Extension Specification (`-`)
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Rename?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, but there are still a lot more things to discuss, see #413.

@m-mohr
Copy link
Collaborator Author

m-mohr commented Jun 6, 2019

Will make a new PR to introduce the summary extension.

@m-mohr m-mohr closed this Jun 6, 2019
@m-mohr m-mohr deleted the non-common-properties-extension branch July 17, 2019 15:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants