Skip to content

gh-125377: Improve tab indentation for pdb multi-line input #130471

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Mar 4, 2025

Conversation

gaogaotiantian
Copy link
Member

@gaogaotiantian gaogaotiantian commented Feb 22, 2025

We supported multi-line input in pdb in 3.13, but the tab indentation does not work in its best shape. It inserts a \t character, which means the first <tab> will introduce a 2-space (at least looks like it) indentation, and the next ones will introduce a 8-space one.

This PR made it a bit smarter. Now a <tab> at the beginning of the line (before any non-space text) will auto-fill a 4-space indentation. For example, \t and \t will both create a 4-space indentation.

This is not the smartest feature, it's not as good as pyrepl where the indentation is inserted when a new line is created. However, I think it's much better than what we have now.

The ultimate goal is to use pyrepl for pdb, so I don't think duplication too much code to make pdb work slightly better now is that rewarding.

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
``<tab>`` at the beginning of the line in :mod:`pdb` multi-line input will fill in a 4-space indentation now, instead of inserting a ``\t`` character.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd add this to what's new in 3.14.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done.

@gaogaotiantian gaogaotiantian merged commit b6769e9 into python:main Mar 4, 2025
43 checks passed
@gaogaotiantian gaogaotiantian deleted the multiline-completion branch March 5, 2025 01:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants