-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31.8k
gh-126609: localize list, allow translation of a phrase, use ge operator character in the availability directive #129597
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
@@ -68,14 +69,17 @@ def run(self) -> list[nodes.container]: | |||
refwarn=True, | |||
) | |||
sep = nodes.Text(": ") | |||
parsed, msgs = self.state.inline_text(self.arguments[0], self.lineno) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It is somewhat surprising that this doesn't work, as sphinx.util.nodes.extract_messages()
should pick up the rawsource attributes -- we shouldn't need to parse & reparse.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Even when I've added not WASI, not Android.
translation string by hand, it wasn't picked up in the build process.
Doc/tools/extensions/availability.py
Outdated
parsed, msgs = self.state.inline_text(self.arguments[0], self.lineno) | ||
platforms = self.parse_platforms() | ||
platforms_text = ( | ||
f"{', '.join(starmap(_print_platform, platforms.items()))}." |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not sure if babel is available here, but format_list
might be a better option?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Babel is Sphinx's dependency, it is available. Thank you for the suggestion, I've added it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Other than my little nitpick it looks very good!
return platform | ||
if not version: | ||
return sphinx_gettext("not {platform}").format(platform=platform) | ||
return f"{platform} ≥ {version}" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
return f"{platform} ≥ {version}" | |
return f"{platform} >= {version}" |
How well supported is "≥"? Does it render well in pdf outputs?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@AA-Turner could you please advise, is there some direct way to recognize epub build in the directive code and fallback to >=
? Or should I rather drop the UTF-8 character from here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I find no mention of using "≥" or ">=" for versions in the Google, Microsoft and Apple style guides, and they say to use words such as "Use version 2.2 or later" and not "Use version 2.2 or higher":
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree with @hugovk . This again will require translation.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I find Google's style guide contradictory 🤔
A release with the highest version number might not be the latest version. For example, if version 2.0 of an operating system receives a bug-fix update after version 3.0 has been released, then version 2.0.1 might be the latest version, even though its version number is lower than 3.0.
In this meaning we rather want to express "higher" than "later". And later they recommend higher in Android docs. I've filed a feedback to this section.
I agree that the written form may be easier to read than the symbolic one. Though ≥ seems to be inambiguous, contrary to “later”.
I will add that >= is currently used.
I wonder what should be the approach, if we decide to use "Linux 2.6.27 or later", should we rewrite also the availability directives content in .rsts? Or introduce a simplified "syntax", that will be rendered to "or later" from a ">=" specificator? That may be confusing to docs editors. (?)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If we choose to use words, I'd rewrite the existing ">=" to avoid problems/confusion by automation changing things in unexpected ways.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We discussed this in this month's docs workgroup meeting: let's keep the directives compact; they're not prose, and use the single symbol. The Unicode symbol was introduced in 1993, hopefully it renders well on near anything. If there's an issue with Unicode in some of the backends (such as man pages), we should fix that.
(Minutes will appear at https://docs-community.readthedocs.io/en/latest/monthly-meeting/index.html in the near future.)
return platform | ||
if not version: | ||
return sphinx_gettext("not {platform}").format(platform=platform) | ||
return f"{platform} ≥ {version}" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I find no mention of using "≥" or ">=" for versions in the Google, Microsoft and Apple style guides, and they say to use words such as "Use version 2.2 or later" and not "Use version 2.2 or higher":
Co-authored-by: Hugo van Kemenade <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Hugo van Kemenade <[email protected]>
It would be good to properly investigate why the A |
I'm convinced that we should translate the full text, instead of building it from fragments (vide Prefer WET over DRY for i18n). Therefore I will close this PR. I didn't yet succeed with the correct solution. I will try to write my findings in related discussion thread soon https://github.com/orgs/sphinx-doc/discussions/13280. |
not {platform}
and fetches its translation in the availability directive content. This will allow full translations of availability directive content.>=
as UTF-8≥
.Tested locally, both
make gettext
(exposes new phrase insphinx.pot
) and rendering withmake html
. Examples of renderings:library/os.rst:2311
📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://cpython-previews--129597.org.readthedocs.build/