gh-111495: Add tests for PyNumber C API #111996

skirpichev · 2023-11-12T03:00:14Z

Issue: Add more C API tests #111495

…a6554)

serhiy-storchaka

The wrapper code is similar for most 1- and 2-argumet functions. What do you think about using macros to generate them? It would be easier to review and extend.

Lib/test/test_capi/test_number.py

serhiy-storchaka

For now LGTM. But please move changes in abstract.c to a separate PR. This PR should contain tests only.

Also, there is an existing PyNumber test in test_abstract. Please move it to other tests, and the corresponding wrapper too.

Modules/_testcapi/numbers.c

Lib/test/test_capi/test_number.py

skirpichev · 2023-11-15T11:51:30Z

please move changes in abstract.c to a separate PR

That was the plan. But please could you first take look on these changes? This part seems to be finished and I would know, for example, if this can go in one PR or in several.

For now, almost every line for PyNumber_* C API is covered. Exceptions are like this:

cpython/Objects/abstract.c

Line 1593 in d4f83e1

if (!result || PyLong_CheckExact(result)) {

~~(result check here will require test code in C)~~

Also, there is an existing PyNumber test in test_abstract.

Indeed. Should I remove number_check() from the abstract.c or from the number.c instead?

Edit:

now everything is covered
number_check() removed from abstract.c
I'll mark this pr as ready for review, as it's reviewed anyway (but it's apparently lacks a number of tests, esp. for mutable ops)

Lib/test/test_capi/test_number.py

serhiy-storchaka · 2023-11-15T14:28:11Z

Lib/test/test_capi/test_number.py

+        # Test PyNumber_Negative()
+        negative = _testcapi.number_negative
+
+        self.assertEqual(negative(42), -42)


For all tests currently with integers only, add also tests with floats and mixed.

Did this with unary ops, then will extend to other tests as well.

In fact, I think the old test layout was a bad idea. In the last commit I'm using just one method to test all four unary functions (PyNumber_Negative and friends).

This should be doable for binary and ternary functions as well, so I'll go that way, probably could do pr ready tomorrow. Special handling will be required for PyNumber_*Add/Multiply, which also utilize tp_as_sequence. Here almost all cases could be tested using built-in types. But not all. Thus, I think some C-coded test type must be used.

Lib/test/test_capi/test_number.py

* Add test for [1, 2] and PY_SSIZE_T_MAX//2 + 1 (test_multiply) * test with floats for unary * test_float/index with strings * 42 is too large. What about 3? // tobase * test with float & string // tobase * complex test for absolute

bedevere-bot · 2024-08-26T14:27:55Z

⚠️⚠️⚠️ Buildbot failure ⚠️⚠️⚠️

Hi! The buildbot AMD64 Debian root 3.x has failed when building commit 2f20f5a.

What do you need to do:

Don't panic.
Check the buildbot page in the devguide if you don't know what the buildbots are or how they work.
Go to the page of the buildbot that failed (https://buildbot.python.org/#/builders/345/builds/8794) and take a look at the build logs.
Check if the failure is related to this commit (2f20f5a) or if it is a false positive.
If the failure is related to this commit, please, reflect that on the issue and make a new Pull Request with a fix.

You can take a look at the buildbot page here:

https://buildbot.python.org/#/builders/345/builds/8794

Failed tests:

test_capi

Failed subtests:

test_rshift_print - test.test_capi.test_number.CAPITest.test_rshift_print

Summary of the results of the build (if available):

==

Click to see traceback logs

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/root/buildarea/3.x.angelico-debian-amd64/build/Lib/test/test_capi/test_number.py", line 227, in test_rshift_print
    self.assertIn('Did you mean "print(<message>, '
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
                  'file=<output_stream>)"?', str(context.exception))
                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
AssertionError: 'Did you mean "print(<message>, file=<output_stream>)"?' not found in "unsupported operand type(s) for >>: 'builtin_function_or_method' and 'int'"

bedevere-bot · 2024-08-26T14:33:41Z

⚠️⚠️⚠️ Buildbot failure ⚠️⚠️⚠️

Hi! The buildbot x86-64 MacOS Intel NoGIL 3.x has failed when building commit 2f20f5a.

What do you need to do:

Don't panic.
Check the buildbot page in the devguide if you don't know what the buildbots are or how they work.
Go to the page of the buildbot that failed (https://buildbot.python.org/#/builders/1258/builds/2654) and take a look at the build logs.
Check if the failure is related to this commit (2f20f5a) or if it is a false positive.
If the failure is related to this commit, please, reflect that on the issue and make a new Pull Request with a fix.

You can take a look at the buildbot page here:

https://buildbot.python.org/#/builders/1258/builds/2654

Failed tests:

test_capi

Failed subtests:

test_rshift_print - test.test_capi.test_number.CAPITest.test_rshift_print

Summary of the results of the build (if available):

==

Click to see traceback logs

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<string>", line 10, in <module>
  File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 813, in module_from_spec
  File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap_external>", line 1046, in create_module
  File "<frozen importlib._bootstrap>", line 488, in _call_with_frames_removed
ImportError: module _test_module_state_shared does not support loading in subinterpreters
xpected failure


Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/Users/ec2-user/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.itamaro-macos-intel-aws.nogil/build/Lib/test/test_capi/test_number.py", line 227, in test_rshift_print
    self.assertIn('Did you mean "print(<message>, '
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
                  'file=<output_stream>)"?', str(context.exception))
                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
AssertionError: 'Did you mean "print(<message>, file=<output_stream>)"?' not found in "unsupported operand type(s) for >>: 'builtin_function_or_method' and 'int'"

bedevere-bot · 2024-08-26T14:33:50Z

⚠️⚠️⚠️ Buildbot failure ⚠️⚠️⚠️

Hi! The buildbot s390x Fedora Clang 3.x has failed when building commit 2f20f5a.

What do you need to do:

Don't panic.
Check the buildbot page in the devguide if you don't know what the buildbots are or how they work.
Go to the page of the buildbot that failed (https://buildbot.python.org/#/builders/3/builds/6639) and take a look at the build logs.
Check if the failure is related to this commit (2f20f5a) or if it is a false positive.
If the failure is related to this commit, please, reflect that on the issue and make a new Pull Request with a fix.

You can take a look at the buildbot page here:

https://buildbot.python.org/#/builders/3/builds/6639

Failed tests:

test_capi

Failed subtests:

test_rshift_print - test.test_capi.test_number.CAPITest.test_rshift_print

Summary of the results of the build (if available):

==

Click to see traceback logs

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/dje/cpython-buildarea/3.x.edelsohn-fedora-z.clang/build/Lib/test/test_capi/test_number.py", line 227, in test_rshift_print
    self.assertIn('Did you mean "print(<message>, '
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
                  'file=<output_stream>)"?', str(context.exception))
                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
AssertionError: 'Did you mean "print(<message>, file=<output_stream>)"?' not found in "unsupported operand type(s) for >>: 'builtin_function_or_method' and 'int'"

bedevere-bot · 2024-08-26T14:34:03Z

⚠️⚠️⚠️ Buildbot failure ⚠️⚠️⚠️

Hi! The buildbot AMD64 Windows10 3.x has failed when building commit 2f20f5a.

What do you need to do:

Don't panic.
Check the buildbot page in the devguide if you don't know what the buildbots are or how they work.
Go to the page of the buildbot that failed (https://buildbot.python.org/#/builders/146/builds/9358) and take a look at the build logs.
Check if the failure is related to this commit (2f20f5a) or if it is a false positive.
If the failure is related to this commit, please, reflect that on the issue and make a new Pull Request with a fix.

You can take a look at the buildbot page here:

https://buildbot.python.org/#/builders/146/builds/9358

Failed tests:

test_capi

Failed subtests:

test_rshift_print - test.test_capi.test_number.CAPITest.test_rshift_print

Summary of the results of the build (if available):

==

Click to see traceback logs

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "D:\buildarea\3.x.bolen-windows10\build\Lib\test\test_capi\test_number.py", line 227, in test_rshift_print
    self.assertIn('Did you mean "print(<message>, '
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
                  'file=<output_stream>)"?', str(context.exception))
                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
AssertionError: 'Did you mean "print(<message>, file=<output_stream>)"?' not found in "unsupported operand type(s) for >>: 'builtin_function_or_method' and 'int'"

bedevere-bot · 2024-08-26T14:37:28Z

⚠️⚠️⚠️ Buildbot failure ⚠️⚠️⚠️

Hi! The buildbot AMD64 RHEL8 LTO + PGO 3.x has failed when building commit 2f20f5a.

What do you need to do:

Don't panic.
Check the buildbot page in the devguide if you don't know what the buildbots are or how they work.
Go to the page of the buildbot that failed (https://buildbot.python.org/#/builders/568/builds/7186) and take a look at the build logs.
Check if the failure is related to this commit (2f20f5a) or if it is a false positive.
If the failure is related to this commit, please, reflect that on the issue and make a new Pull Request with a fix.

You can take a look at the buildbot page here:

https://buildbot.python.org/#/builders/568/builds/7186

Failed tests:

test_capi

Failed subtests:

test_rshift_print - test.test_capi.test_number.CAPITest.test_rshift_print

Summary of the results of the build (if available):

==

Click to see traceback logs

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.cstratak-RHEL8-x86_64.lto-pgo/build/Lib/test/test_capi/test_number.py", line 227, in test_rshift_print
    self.assertIn('Did you mean "print(<message>, '
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
                  'file=<output_stream>)"?', str(context.exception))
                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
AssertionError: 'Did you mean "print(<message>, file=<output_stream>)"?' not found in "unsupported operand type(s) for >>: 'builtin_function_or_method' and 'int'"

bedevere-bot · 2024-08-26T14:38:27Z

⚠️⚠️⚠️ Buildbot failure ⚠️⚠️⚠️

Hi! The buildbot s390x RHEL8 LTO 3.x has failed when building commit 2f20f5a.

What do you need to do:

Don't panic.
Check the buildbot page in the devguide if you don't know what the buildbots are or how they work.
Go to the page of the buildbot that failed (https://buildbot.python.org/#/builders/567/builds/7197) and take a look at the build logs.
Check if the failure is related to this commit (2f20f5a) or if it is a false positive.
If the failure is related to this commit, please, reflect that on the issue and make a new Pull Request with a fix.

You can take a look at the buildbot page here:

https://buildbot.python.org/#/builders/567/builds/7197

Failed tests:

test_capi

Failed subtests:

test_rshift_print - test.test_capi.test_number.CAPITest.test_rshift_print

Summary of the results of the build (if available):

==

Click to see traceback logs

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/dje/cpython-buildarea/3.x.edelsohn-rhel8-z.lto/build/Lib/test/test_capi/test_number.py", line 227, in test_rshift_print
    self.assertIn('Did you mean "print(<message>, '
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
                  'file=<output_stream>)"?', str(context.exception))
                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
AssertionError: 'Did you mean "print(<message>, file=<output_stream>)"?' not found in "unsupported operand type(s) for >>: 'builtin_function_or_method' and 'int'"

bedevere-bot · 2024-08-26T14:38:54Z

⚠️⚠️⚠️ Buildbot failure ⚠️⚠️⚠️

Hi! The buildbot s390x Fedora Clang Installed 3.x has failed when building commit 2f20f5a.

What do you need to do:

Don't panic.
Check the buildbot page in the devguide if you don't know what the buildbots are or how they work.
Go to the page of the buildbot that failed (https://buildbot.python.org/#/builders/531/builds/6470) and take a look at the build logs.
Check if the failure is related to this commit (2f20f5a) or if it is a false positive.
If the failure is related to this commit, please, reflect that on the issue and make a new Pull Request with a fix.

You can take a look at the buildbot page here:

https://buildbot.python.org/#/builders/531/builds/6470

Failed tests:

test_capi

Failed subtests:

test_rshift_print - test.test_capi.test_number.CAPITest.test_rshift_print

Summary of the results of the build (if available):

==

Click to see traceback logs

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/dje/cpython-buildarea/3.x.edelsohn-fedora-z.clang-installed/build/target/lib/python3.14/test/test_capi/test_number.py", line 227, in test_rshift_print
    self.assertIn('Did you mean "print(<message>, '
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
                  'file=<output_stream>)"?', str(context.exception))
                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
AssertionError: 'Did you mean "print(<message>, file=<output_stream>)"?' not found in "unsupported operand type(s) for >>: 'builtin_function_or_method' and 'int'"

bedevere-bot · 2024-08-26T14:39:00Z

⚠️⚠️⚠️ Buildbot failure ⚠️⚠️⚠️

Hi! The buildbot AMD64 RHEL8 FIPS Only Blake2 Builtin Hash 3.x has failed when building commit 2f20f5a.

What do you need to do:

Don't panic.
Check the buildbot page in the devguide if you don't know what the buildbots are or how they work.
Go to the page of the buildbot that failed (https://buildbot.python.org/#/builders/469/builds/8845) and take a look at the build logs.
Check if the failure is related to this commit (2f20f5a) or if it is a false positive.
If the failure is related to this commit, please, reflect that on the issue and make a new Pull Request with a fix.

You can take a look at the buildbot page here:

https://buildbot.python.org/#/builders/469/builds/8845

Failed tests:

test_capi

Failed subtests:

test_rshift_print - test.test_capi.test_number.CAPITest.test_rshift_print

Summary of the results of the build (if available):

==

Click to see traceback logs

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.cstratak-RHEL8-fips-x86_64.no-builtin-hashes-except-blake2/build/Lib/test/test_capi/test_number.py", line 227, in test_rshift_print
    self.assertIn('Did you mean "print(<message>, '
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
                  'file=<output_stream>)"?', str(context.exception))
                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
AssertionError: 'Did you mean "print(<message>, file=<output_stream>)"?' not found in "unsupported operand type(s) for >>: 'builtin_function_or_method' and 'int'"

bedevere-bot · 2024-08-26T14:40:58Z

⚠️⚠️⚠️ Buildbot failure ⚠️⚠️⚠️

Hi! The buildbot s390x RHEL9 LTO 3.x has failed when building commit 2f20f5a.

What do you need to do:

Don't panic.
Check the buildbot page in the devguide if you don't know what the buildbots are or how they work.
Go to the page of the buildbot that failed (https://buildbot.python.org/#/builders/1587/builds/177) and take a look at the build logs.
Check if the failure is related to this commit (2f20f5a) or if it is a false positive.
If the failure is related to this commit, please, reflect that on the issue and make a new Pull Request with a fix.

You can take a look at the buildbot page here:

https://buildbot.python.org/#/builders/1587/builds/177

Failed tests:

test_capi

Failed subtests:

test_rshift_print - test.test_capi.test_number.CAPITest.test_rshift_print

Summary of the results of the build (if available):

==

Click to see traceback logs

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/dje/cpython-buildarea/3.x.edelsohn-rhel-z.lto/build/Lib/test/test_capi/test_number.py", line 227, in test_rshift_print
    self.assertIn('Did you mean "print(<message>, '
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
                  'file=<output_stream>)"?', str(context.exception))
                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
AssertionError: 'Did you mean "print(<message>, file=<output_stream>)"?' not found in "unsupported operand type(s) for >>: 'builtin_function_or_method' and 'int'"

bedevere-bot · 2024-08-26T14:43:27Z

⚠️⚠️⚠️ Buildbot failure ⚠️⚠️⚠️

Hi! The buildbot AMD64 Ubuntu Shared 3.x has failed when building commit 2f20f5a.

What do you need to do:

Don't panic.
Check the buildbot page in the devguide if you don't know what the buildbots are or how they work.
Go to the page of the buildbot that failed (https://buildbot.python.org/#/builders/506/builds/8613) and take a look at the build logs.
Check if the failure is related to this commit (2f20f5a) or if it is a false positive.
If the failure is related to this commit, please, reflect that on the issue and make a new Pull Request with a fix.

You can take a look at the buildbot page here:

https://buildbot.python.org/#/builders/506/builds/8613

Failed tests:

test_capi

Failed subtests:

test_rshift_print - test.test_capi.test_number.CAPITest.test_rshift_print

Summary of the results of the build (if available):

==

Click to see traceback logs

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/srv/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.bolen-ubuntu/build/Lib/test/test_capi/test_number.py", line 227, in test_rshift_print
    self.assertIn('Did you mean "print(<message>, '
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
                  'file=<output_stream>)"?', str(context.exception))
                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
AssertionError: 'Did you mean "print(<message>, file=<output_stream>)"?' not found in "unsupported operand type(s) for >>: 'builtin_function_or_method' and 'int'"

bedevere-bot · 2024-08-26T14:47:06Z

⚠️⚠️⚠️ Buildbot failure ⚠️⚠️⚠️

Hi! The buildbot x86-64 macOS 3.x has failed when building commit 2f20f5a.

What do you need to do:

Don't panic.
Check the buildbot page in the devguide if you don't know what the buildbots are or how they work.
Go to the page of the buildbot that failed (https://buildbot.python.org/#/builders/366/builds/7532) and take a look at the build logs.
Check if the failure is related to this commit (2f20f5a) or if it is a false positive.
If the failure is related to this commit, please, reflect that on the issue and make a new Pull Request with a fix.

You can take a look at the buildbot page here:

https://buildbot.python.org/#/builders/366/builds/7532

Failed tests:

test_capi

Failed subtests:

test_rshift_print - test.test_capi.test_number.CAPITest.test_rshift_print

Summary of the results of the build (if available):

==

Click to see traceback logs

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/Users/buildbot/buildarea/3.x.billenstein-macos/build/Lib/test/test_capi/test_number.py", line 227, in test_rshift_print
    self.assertIn('Did you mean "print(<message>, '
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
                  'file=<output_stream>)"?', str(context.exception))
                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
AssertionError: 'Did you mean "print(<message>, file=<output_stream>)"?' not found in "unsupported operand type(s) for >>: 'builtin_function_or_method' and 'int'"

bedevere-bot · 2024-08-26T14:54:57Z

⚠️⚠️⚠️ Buildbot failure ⚠️⚠️⚠️

Hi! The buildbot ARM64 Windows 3.x has failed when building commit 2f20f5a.

What do you need to do:

Don't panic.
Check the buildbot page in the devguide if you don't know what the buildbots are or how they work.
Go to the page of the buildbot that failed (https://buildbot.python.org/#/builders/729/builds/6685) and take a look at the build logs.
Check if the failure is related to this commit (2f20f5a) or if it is a false positive.
If the failure is related to this commit, please, reflect that on the issue and make a new Pull Request with a fix.

You can take a look at the buildbot page here:

https://buildbot.python.org/#/builders/729/builds/6685

Failed tests:

test_capi

Failed subtests:

test_rshift_print - test.test_capi.test_number.CAPITest.test_rshift_print

Summary of the results of the build (if available):

==

Click to see traceback logs

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "C:\Workspace\buildarea\3.x.linaro-win-arm64\build\Lib\test\test_capi\test_number.py", line 227, in test_rshift_print
    self.assertIn('Did you mean "print(<message>, '
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
                  'file=<output_stream>)"?', str(context.exception))
                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
AssertionError: 'Did you mean "print(<message>, file=<output_stream>)"?' not found in "unsupported operand type(s) for >>: 'builtin_function_or_method' and 'int'"

bedevere-bot · 2024-08-26T14:56:26Z

⚠️⚠️⚠️ Buildbot failure ⚠️⚠️⚠️

Hi! The buildbot s390x Fedora LTO + PGO 3.x has failed when building commit 2f20f5a.

What do you need to do:

Don't panic.
Check the buildbot page in the devguide if you don't know what the buildbots are or how they work.
Go to the page of the buildbot that failed (https://buildbot.python.org/#/builders/545/builds/6412) and take a look at the build logs.
Check if the failure is related to this commit (2f20f5a) or if it is a false positive.
If the failure is related to this commit, please, reflect that on the issue and make a new Pull Request with a fix.

You can take a look at the buildbot page here:

https://buildbot.python.org/#/builders/545/builds/6412

Failed tests:

test_capi

Failed subtests:

test_rshift_print - test.test_capi.test_number.CAPITest.test_rshift_print

Summary of the results of the build (if available):

==

Click to see traceback logs

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/dje/cpython-buildarea/3.x.edelsohn-fedora-z.lto-pgo/build/Lib/test/test_capi/test_number.py", line 227, in test_rshift_print
    self.assertIn('Did you mean "print(<message>, '
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
                  'file=<output_stream>)"?', str(context.exception))
                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
AssertionError: 'Did you mean "print(<message>, file=<output_stream>)"?' not found in "unsupported operand type(s) for >>: 'builtin_function_or_method' and 'int'"

bedevere-bot · 2024-08-26T15:12:00Z

⚠️⚠️⚠️ Buildbot failure ⚠️⚠️⚠️

Hi! The buildbot ARM64 Windows Non-Debug 3.x has failed when building commit 2f20f5a.

What do you need to do:

Don't panic.
Check the buildbot page in the devguide if you don't know what the buildbots are or how they work.
Go to the page of the buildbot that failed (https://buildbot.python.org/#/builders/730/builds/10142) and take a look at the build logs.
Check if the failure is related to this commit (2f20f5a) or if it is a false positive.
If the failure is related to this commit, please, reflect that on the issue and make a new Pull Request with a fix.

You can take a look at the buildbot page here:

https://buildbot.python.org/#/builders/730/builds/10142

Failed tests:

test_capi

Failed subtests:

test_rshift_print - test.test_capi.test_number.CAPITest.test_rshift_print

Summary of the results of the build (if available):

==

Click to see traceback logs

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "C:\Workspace\buildarea\3.x.linaro-win-arm64.nondebug\build\Lib\test\test_capi\test_number.py", line 227, in test_rshift_print
    self.assertIn('Did you mean "print(<message>, '
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
                  'file=<output_stream>)"?', str(context.exception))
                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
AssertionError: 'Did you mean "print(<message>, file=<output_stream>)"?' not found in "unsupported operand type(s) for >>: 'builtin_function_or_method' and 'int'"

bedevere-bot · 2024-08-26T15:13:11Z

⚠️⚠️⚠️ Buildbot failure ⚠️⚠️⚠️

Hi! The buildbot s390x Fedora LTO 3.x has failed when building commit 2f20f5a.

What do you need to do:

Don't panic.
Check the buildbot page in the devguide if you don't know what the buildbots are or how they work.
Go to the page of the buildbot that failed (https://buildbot.python.org/#/builders/55/builds/5519) and take a look at the build logs.
Check if the failure is related to this commit (2f20f5a) or if it is a false positive.
If the failure is related to this commit, please, reflect that on the issue and make a new Pull Request with a fix.

You can take a look at the buildbot page here:

https://buildbot.python.org/#/builders/55/builds/5519

Failed tests:

test_capi

Failed subtests:

test_rshift_print - test.test_capi.test_number.CAPITest.test_rshift_print

Summary of the results of the build (if available):

==

Click to see traceback logs

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/dje/cpython-buildarea/3.x.edelsohn-fedora-z.lto/build/Lib/test/test_capi/test_number.py", line 227, in test_rshift_print
    self.assertIn('Did you mean "print(<message>, '
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
                  'file=<output_stream>)"?', str(context.exception))
                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
AssertionError: 'Did you mean "print(<message>, file=<output_stream>)"?' not found in "unsupported operand type(s) for >>: 'builtin_function_or_method' and 'int'"

skirpichev · 2024-08-27T03:40:31Z

Oops, that's a real bug: I wrote PR #123338 to fix the tests.

Yeah, I forgot to sync this pr with the main branch.

@vstinner, probably this also should be backported (as is) for 3.12 and 3.13?

miss-islington-app · 2024-08-27T05:29:58Z

Thanks @skirpichev for the PR, and @vstinner for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.13.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

miss-islington-app · 2024-08-27T05:29:58Z

Thanks @skirpichev for the PR, and @vstinner for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.12.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

(cherry picked from commit 2f20f5a) Co-authored-by: Sergey B Kirpichev <[email protected]>

miss-islington-app · 2024-08-27T05:30:05Z

Sorry, @skirpichev and @vstinner, I could not cleanly backport this to 3.12 due to a conflict.
Please backport using cherry_picker on command line.

cherry_picker 2f20f5a9bc7dafdb3c2ae723da90eca1727a95f7 3.12

bedevere-app · 2024-08-27T05:30:05Z

GH-123375 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.13 branch.

(cherry picked from commit 2f20f5a) Co-authored-by: Sergey B Kirpichev <[email protected]>

bedevere-app · 2024-08-27T05:56:27Z

GH-123376 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.12 branch.

gh-111495: Add tests for PyNumber C API (GH-111996) (cherry picked from commit 2f20f5a) Co-authored-by: Sergey B Kirpichev <[email protected]>

(cherry picked from commit 2f20f5a)

skirpichev added 3 commits November 12, 2023 05:56

pythongh-111495: Add tests for PyNumber C API

cbca658

Remove inaccessible code (PyLong_AsSsize_t raises OverflowError)

0d95d57

Drop checks for broken float subclasses (like for PyNumber_Long in 31…

7b8adb4

…a6554)

bedevere-app bot mentioned this pull request Nov 12, 2023

Add more C API tests #111495

Closed

10 tasks

This comment was marked as resolved.

Sign in to view

Eclips4 added the skip news label Nov 12, 2023

serhiy-storchaka reviewed Nov 12, 2023

View reviewed changes

Lib/test/test_capi/test_number.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

skirpichev added 4 commits November 13, 2023 10:56

+ tests with sets for intersection/union/etc

4665f25

Use macroses

9e14905

Merge branch 'main' into capi-number-tests

c0f4051

Merge branch 'main' into capi-number-tests

3a7a4c4

skirpichev force-pushed the capi-number-tests branch from dd182df to daf4b6f Compare November 15, 2023 06:38

skirpichev added 2 commits November 15, 2023 09:40

Ternary ops (currently only pow/ipow) don't use __r*__ dunders

788e9c2

More tests

8cf4429

skirpichev force-pushed the capi-number-tests branch from daf4b6f to 8cf4429 Compare November 15, 2023 06:40

Merge branch 'main' into capi-number-tests

91c68a7

serhiy-storchaka reviewed Nov 15, 2023

View reviewed changes

Modules/_testcapi/numbers.c Show resolved Hide resolved

Lib/test/test_capi/test_number.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

Lib/test/test_capi/test_number.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

skirpichev added 4 commits November 15, 2023 14:22

More tests

9f6fd15

Use BINARY_FUNC macro for some remaining ops

9f5b7a1

Add UNARY_FUNC macro to define unary PyNumber_* functions

2675738

Fix typo

2bc6bc7

skirpichev force-pushed the capi-number-tests branch from 15f8a7b to 2bc6bc7 Compare November 15, 2023 11:38

skirpichev added 3 commits November 15, 2023 15:56

Make last argument optional for PyNumber_Power/InPlacePower

49d673b

More tests

b2dda89

Remove number_check() from _testcapi/abstract.c, move tests

b86d2eb

skirpichev marked this pull request as ready for review November 15, 2023 13:28

bedevere-app bot added the awaiting review label Nov 15, 2023

serhiy-storchaka reviewed Nov 15, 2023

View reviewed changes

address review:

0fbbba9

* Add test for [1, 2] and PY_SSIZE_T_MAX//2 + 1 (test_multiply) * test with floats for unary * test_float/index with strings * 42 is too large. What about 3? // tobase * test with float & string // tobase * complex test for absolute

serhiy-storchaka added needs backport to 3.12 only security fixes needs backport to 3.13 bugs and security fixes labels Aug 27, 2024

miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2024

pythongh-111495: Add tests for PyNumber C API (pythonGH-111996)

1144c52

(cherry picked from commit 2f20f5a) Co-authored-by: Sergey B Kirpichev <[email protected]>

miss-islington-app bot assigned vstinner Aug 27, 2024

bedevere-app bot removed the needs backport to 3.13 bugs and security fixes label Aug 27, 2024

skirpichev added a commit to skirpichev/cpython that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2024

[3.12] pythongh-111495: Add tests for PyNumber C API (pythonGH-111996)

713f338

(cherry picked from commit 2f20f5a) Co-authored-by: Sergey B Kirpichev <[email protected]>

bedevere-app bot removed the needs backport to 3.12 only security fixes label Aug 27, 2024

Yhg1s pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 2, 2024

[3.13] gh-111495: Add tests for PyNumber C API (GH-111996) (#123375)

cbcb9e1

gh-111495: Add tests for PyNumber C API (GH-111996) (cherry picked from commit 2f20f5a) Co-authored-by: Sergey B Kirpichev <[email protected]>

vstinner pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 5, 2024

[3.12] gh-111495: Add tests for PyNumber C API (GH-111996) (#123376)

1d8ab25

(cherry picked from commit 2f20f5a)

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

gh-111495: Add tests for PyNumber C API #111996

gh-111495: Add tests for PyNumber C API #111996

skirpichev commented Nov 12, 2023 •

edited by bedevere-app bot

Loading

This comment was marked as resolved.

serhiy-storchaka left a comment

serhiy-storchaka left a comment

skirpichev commented Nov 15, 2023 •

edited

Loading

serhiy-storchaka Nov 15, 2023

skirpichev Nov 16, 2023

skirpichev Nov 18, 2023

bedevere-bot commented Aug 26, 2024

bedevere-bot commented Aug 26, 2024

bedevere-bot commented Aug 26, 2024

bedevere-bot commented Aug 26, 2024

bedevere-bot commented Aug 26, 2024

bedevere-bot commented Aug 26, 2024

bedevere-bot commented Aug 26, 2024

bedevere-bot commented Aug 26, 2024

bedevere-bot commented Aug 26, 2024

bedevere-bot commented Aug 26, 2024

bedevere-bot commented Aug 26, 2024

bedevere-bot commented Aug 26, 2024

bedevere-bot commented Aug 26, 2024

bedevere-bot commented Aug 26, 2024

bedevere-bot commented Aug 26, 2024

skirpichev commented Aug 27, 2024

miss-islington-app bot commented Aug 27, 2024

miss-islington-app bot commented Aug 27, 2024

miss-islington-app bot commented Aug 27, 2024

bedevere-app bot commented Aug 27, 2024

bedevere-app bot commented Aug 27, 2024

gh-111495: Add tests for PyNumber C API #111996

gh-111495: Add tests for PyNumber C API #111996

Conversation

skirpichev commented Nov 12, 2023 • edited by bedevere-app bot Loading

This comment was marked as resolved.

serhiy-storchaka left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

serhiy-storchaka left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

skirpichev commented Nov 15, 2023 • edited Loading

serhiy-storchaka Nov 15, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

skirpichev Nov 16, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

skirpichev Nov 18, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

bedevere-bot commented Aug 26, 2024

⚠️⚠️⚠️ Buildbot failure ⚠️⚠️⚠️

bedevere-bot commented Aug 26, 2024

⚠️⚠️⚠️ Buildbot failure ⚠️⚠️⚠️

bedevere-bot commented Aug 26, 2024

⚠️⚠️⚠️ Buildbot failure ⚠️⚠️⚠️

bedevere-bot commented Aug 26, 2024

⚠️⚠️⚠️ Buildbot failure ⚠️⚠️⚠️

bedevere-bot commented Aug 26, 2024

⚠️⚠️⚠️ Buildbot failure ⚠️⚠️⚠️

bedevere-bot commented Aug 26, 2024

⚠️⚠️⚠️ Buildbot failure ⚠️⚠️⚠️

bedevere-bot commented Aug 26, 2024

⚠️⚠️⚠️ Buildbot failure ⚠️⚠️⚠️

bedevere-bot commented Aug 26, 2024

⚠️⚠️⚠️ Buildbot failure ⚠️⚠️⚠️

bedevere-bot commented Aug 26, 2024

⚠️⚠️⚠️ Buildbot failure ⚠️⚠️⚠️

bedevere-bot commented Aug 26, 2024

⚠️⚠️⚠️ Buildbot failure ⚠️⚠️⚠️

bedevere-bot commented Aug 26, 2024

⚠️⚠️⚠️ Buildbot failure ⚠️⚠️⚠️

bedevere-bot commented Aug 26, 2024

⚠️⚠️⚠️ Buildbot failure ⚠️⚠️⚠️

bedevere-bot commented Aug 26, 2024

⚠️⚠️⚠️ Buildbot failure ⚠️⚠️⚠️

bedevere-bot commented Aug 26, 2024

⚠️⚠️⚠️ Buildbot failure ⚠️⚠️⚠️

bedevere-bot commented Aug 26, 2024

⚠️⚠️⚠️ Buildbot failure ⚠️⚠️⚠️

skirpichev commented Aug 27, 2024

miss-islington-app bot commented Aug 27, 2024

miss-islington-app bot commented Aug 27, 2024

miss-islington-app bot commented Aug 27, 2024

bedevere-app bot commented Aug 27, 2024

bedevere-app bot commented Aug 27, 2024

skirpichev commented Nov 12, 2023 •

edited by bedevere-app bot

Loading

skirpichev commented Nov 15, 2023 •

edited

Loading