pyproject.toml: remove unused ignore-list entry #13490
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The term `socio-economic` does not appear to be autocorrected by recent versions of `codespell`. The term appears in the project's Code of Conduct, and in the configured list of ignored-corrections; I believe we can remove it from the ignored word list. Tested with version 2.4.1 of `codespell` (and via `pre-commit`).
Pierre-Sassoulas
added
the
skip news
Pierre-Sassoulas
approved these changes
Jun 4, 2025
|
Nice catch ! |
|
Thanks @Pierre-Sassoulas @cclauss! |
jayaddison
deleted the
pr-12769-followup/remove-unused-codespell-ignore-word-entry
branch
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The term
socio-economicdoes not appear to be autocorrected by recent versions ofcodespell. The term appears inpytest's Code of Conduct, and in the configured list of ignored-corrections; I believe we can remove it from the ignored word list.Tested with version 2.4.1 of
codespell(and viapre-commit).Observed during code upgrade review from
8.3.5...8.4.0, specifically of #12769.cc @cclauss