Upgrade OTP versions, supporting now only 26/27/28 and adapting to enhancements #184
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
NelsonVides
requested review from
deadtrickster,
paulo-ferraz-oliveira,
mikpe,
mkuratczyk,
onno-vos-dev,
DenysGonchar,
MirahImage and
lhoguin
mkuratczyk
previously approved these changes
May 25, 2025
mikpe
previously approved these changes
May 25, 2025
paulo-ferraz-oliveira
previously approved these changes
May 25, 2025
NelsonVides
dismissed stale reviews from paulo-ferraz-oliveira, mikpe, and mkuratczyk
via
42ed97b
NelsonVides
changed the title
|
Anybody wants to reapprove? Previous approvals were restarted after the last pushed changes :) |
mkuratczyk
approved these changes
May 27, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Takes advantage of
dynamic()typing as well as ofets:lookup_element/4.Tagging everyone as it might be a more "controversial" change.