-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.9k
Create mitel-micollab-ucs-version-detect.yaml #12368
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Automated PR Review (Experimental)Thank you for your contribution! You can join our Discord server. It's a great place to connect with fellow contributors and stay updated with the latest developments. Thank you once again. Required Fixes
Other Suggestions
Note: I am an AI Template bot which is still experimental, and the team will review the PR shortly. |
Would it be possible to add the version extract to the existing MiCollab Panel detection? Or is the UCS different from the End User panel that is detected in that template? If this is the same, maybe a secondary HTTP request with version extractor would be better suites in that template. Additionally, consider adding a word matcher on |
Oh not sure about that. I do know for certain that it is possible to have
different concurrent version levels at the same time (disjoined?).
I don't see the prior module you mentioned but none of the latest versions
trigger so ...? This works alright AFAIK.
Sure I did wonder about the Jason matcher vs regex, thanks.
…On Mon, 16 June 2025, 21:56 Chris, ***@***.***> wrote:
*darses* left a comment (projectdiscovery/nuclei-templates#12368)
<#12368 (comment)>
Would it be possible to add the version extract to the existing MiCollab
Panel detection? Or is the UCS different from the End User panel that is
detected in that template? If this is the same, maybe a secondary HTTP
request with version extractor would be better suites in that template.
Additionally, consider adding a word matcher on {"version": to avoid the
weak matcher error.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#12368 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAI67CTRABLQ75VNGSKPNN33D2WGVAVCNFSM6AAAAAB7L6SN2KVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDSNZWGI4DKNZQGQ>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Swapped JSON for regex
@aushack My point was not directed at the extraction. I think the JSON extractor is fine there. My recommendation was to add |
Check JSON version exists in response
Looks good, and also fixes the weak-matcher error! |
Detect version number from JSON file