Skip to content

fix: Reverts fork-ts-checker version bump #1567

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 29, 2021
Merged

Conversation

rschristian
Copy link
Member

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

Bugfix / partial revert of #1465

Did you add tests for your changes?

No

Summary

fork-ts-checker-webpack-plugin was broken as of v3.2.0, as it was upgraded a couple major versions without updating its config.

Unfortunately versions >= 5 seem to entirely lock our build process. I spent an hour trying to hunt down the reason but no luck. Hangs with no errors or logs to check.

Reverting at least allows TS users to have a functional build tool.

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

No

@rschristian rschristian requested a review from a team as a code owner May 28, 2021 21:54
@changeset-bot
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented May 28, 2021

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 7b43b8e

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
Name Type
preact-cli Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@rschristian
Copy link
Member Author

Seems like the pnpm ci is broken in general, nothing to do with this PR

@ForsakenHarmony
Copy link
Member

hmm, that's weird, it was passing on master

@rschristian
Copy link
Member Author

rschristian commented May 29, 2021

We don't have any TS tests and the plugin only is enabled if there's a tsconfig.json

Oops, realized you're talking about the CI. Looks to be something with TS 4.3.2, which was just released. Not sure why that breaks things though?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants