-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26
Tests for process tree structure #64
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
fb4eac9
Add first test for nginx/Gunicorn master/worker processes
JayH5 1c4a692
Two (2)
JayH5 4faa5c6
Assert that we've inspected all the processes
JayH5 975da0d
Assert process structure for single worker tests
JayH5 a4fe851
Assert process structure for Celery worker container
JayH5 66d0e35
Assert process structure for Celery beat container
JayH5 e107df2
Remove unused matcher
JayH5 6c32c96
Don't need our own matcher now that we assert on processes one at a time
JayH5 f640a57
Fix bad copy/pasta
JayH5 7db8520
Assert on process trees directly.
jerith 20b35e2
Minor style cleanup of matcher strings
JayH5 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@ | ||
from .helper import DockerHelper | ||
from .utils import list_container_processes, output_lines, wait_for_log_line | ||
from .utils import ( | ||
list_container_processes, output_lines, wait_for_log_line, | ||
build_process_tree) | ||
|
||
__all__ = ['DockerHelper', 'list_container_processes', 'output_lines', | ||
'wait_for_log_line'] | ||
'wait_for_log_line', 'build_process_tree'] |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does it still make sense to have
ppid
here?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For completeness, I think it does. There's no reason not to have it, and people might want to examine subtrees and assert that the subtree's root has the right
ppid
.