Skip to content

Handle mismatch between NodeType and type deducted from hardware-version #248

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
May 30, 2025

Conversation

bouwew
Copy link
Contributor

@bouwew bouwew commented May 30, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Improved detection and correction of device Name and Model, especially for Switch devices, ensuring more accurate device identification.
  • Chores
    • Updated project version to 0.40.1b0.
    • Added a changelog entry for the latest improvements.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented May 30, 2025

Walkthrough

The updates reorganize and enhance the node detail update logic in the Plugwise USB node module, specifically improving model detection and correction for Switch devices. The project version is incremented, and a changelog entry is added to document the improved device name and model detection.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
plugwise_usb/nodes/node.py Refactored node detail update logic, added model correction for Switch devices, reordered field processing.
CHANGELOG.md Added entry for version 0.40.1 documenting improved Switch device name and model detection.
pyproject.toml Updated project version from v0.40.0 to v0.40.1b0.

Poem

A Switch once wore the wrong attire,
Now its model’s true, as you require.
With names and types all set just right,
The changelog shines, the version’s bright!
🐇✨ Devices now report with pride—
In v0.40.1b0, correctness can’t hide!


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3628a4d and 6cd62ed.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
  • pyproject.toml (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • pyproject.toml
  • CHANGELOG.md
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: Check commit
  • GitHub Check: Check commit

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai or @coderabbitai title anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented May 30, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 71.42857% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 81.19%. Comparing base (e3e84a4) to head (6cd62ed).
Report is 10 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
plugwise_usb/nodes/node.py 71.42% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #248      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   81.23%   81.19%   -0.04%     
==========================================
  Files          36       36              
  Lines        7363     7366       +3     
==========================================
  Hits         5981     5981              
- Misses       1382     1385       +3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link

@bouwew bouwew marked this pull request as ready for review May 30, 2025 18:18
@bouwew bouwew requested a review from a team as a code owner May 30, 2025 18:18
@bouwew bouwew merged commit af13cee into main May 30, 2025
26 of 29 checks passed
@bouwew bouwew deleted the correct_model branch May 30, 2025 18:18
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request May 31, 2025
bouwew added a commit that referenced this pull request May 31, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant