Skip to content

Adds support for DISTINCT in Eval #1292

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 20, 2023
Merged

Adds support for DISTINCT in Eval #1292

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 20, 2023

Conversation

johnedquinn
Copy link
Member

@johnedquinn johnedquinn commented Dec 8, 2023

Relevant Issues

  • None

Description

  • Adds support for DISTINCT in Planner and Eval
  • I also refactored the tests to make it easier to rebase and continue developing. Prior sanity tests were 17 passing and 2 disabled. There are now 18 passing and 2 disabled. The newly introduced one had to do with DISTINCT.

Other Information

License Information

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 8, 2023

Conformance comparison report

Base (16f9cca) 92ff11f +/-
% Passing 92.54% 92.54% 0.00%
✅ Passing 5384 5384 0
❌ Failing 434 434 0
🔶 Ignored 0 0 0
Total Tests 5818 5818 0

Number passing in both: 5384

Number failing in both: 434

Number passing in Base (16f9cca) but now fail: 0

Number failing in Base (16f9cca) but now pass: 0

@johnedquinn johnedquinn marked this pull request as ready for review December 8, 2023 23:13
@johnedquinn johnedquinn marked this pull request as draft December 8, 2023 23:13
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Dec 8, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (partiql-eval@16f9cca). Click here to learn what that means.

Additional details and impacted files
@@               Coverage Diff               @@
##             partiql-eval    #1292   +/-   ##
===============================================
  Coverage                ?   49.26%           
  Complexity              ?     1046           
===============================================
  Files                   ?      166           
  Lines                   ?    13396           
  Branches                ?     2504           
===============================================
  Hits                    ?     6600           
  Misses                  ?     6139           
  Partials                ?      657           
Flag Coverage Δ
CLI 11.86% <0.00%> (?)
EXAMPLES 80.28% <0.00%> (?)
LANG 54.71% <0.00%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@johnedquinn johnedquinn marked this pull request as ready for review December 14, 2023 18:56
@johnedquinn johnedquinn force-pushed the add-distinct branch 3 times, most recently from 9ea3e31 to a609f7f Compare December 19, 2023 22:20
@johnedquinn johnedquinn requested a review from rchowell December 19, 2023 22:52
structValue(
"a" to int32Value(1),
"b" to int32Value(2)
SuccessTestCase(
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice. Thanks. Would be nice to have these in files somewhere like typer tests

@johnedquinn johnedquinn merged commit d64784c into partiql-eval Dec 20, 2023
@johnedquinn johnedquinn deleted the add-distinct branch December 20, 2023 19:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants