Switch from hardcoding gnome-terminal to using xdg-terminal-exec
#170
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This is packaged in various Linux distros already: https://repology.org/project/xdg-terminal-exec/versions and we can't assume that gnome-terminal is preinstalled anymore (CentOS Stream 10, RHEL 10 and derivatives, Fedora 47+ and Ubuntu have switched to ptyxis by default) (not sure why the openSUSE version number is weird) Signed-off-by: Michel Lind <[email protected]>
michel-slm
force-pushed
the
use-xdg-terminal-exec
branch
from
0ddcd29 to
be26861
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is packaged in various Linux distros already: https://repology.org/project/xdg-terminal-exec/versions
and we can't assume that
gnome-terminalis preinstalled anymore (CentOS Stream 10, RHEL 10 and derivatives, Fedora 47+ and Ubuntu have switched to ptyxis by default)(not sure why the openSUSE version number is weird)