Skip to content

deps: update ort to v59.3.0 #296

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 22, 2025
Merged

deps: update ort to v59.3.0 #296

merged 1 commit into from
May 22, 2025

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented May 22, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
org.ossreviewtoolkit.plugins.packagemanagers:nuget-package-manager (source) 59.2.0 -> 59.3.0 age adoption passing confidence
org.ossreviewtoolkit:model (source) 59.2.0 -> 59.3.0 age adoption passing confidence
org.ossreviewtoolkit:reporter (source) 59.2.0 -> 59.3.0 age adoption passing confidence
org.ossreviewtoolkit:notifier (source) 59.2.0 -> 59.3.0 age adoption passing confidence
org.ossreviewtoolkit:evaluator (source) 59.2.0 -> 59.3.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

oss-review-toolkit/ort (org.ossreviewtoolkit.plugins.packagemanagers:nuget-package-manager)

v59.3.0

Compare Source

What's Changed
🐞 Bug Fixes
  • f865436 scanoss: Display local file path instead of remote path
  • bedb564 scanoss: Snippet generation logic to correctly represent match data
  • 3f4b2f6 scanoss: Standardize SCANOSS naming in comments and documentation
  • b745169 scanoss: snippetFindings use remote file path instead of OSSKB URL
🎉 New Features
  • feecb6d model: Detect and exclude binary license files
  • 751a8e5 scanoss: Exclude identified snippets from SnippetFindings
  • 7812608 spdx: Tolerate invalid SPDX expressions when writing reports
✅ Tests
  • 56a6d18 bazel: Run funTests after the Conan package manager ones
  • a54eeae python: Update expected results
  • 21e9d99 scanoss: Add tests for license handling edge cases
  • fee9e96 scanoss: Use relative paths in test resources
🐘 Build & ⚙️ CI
  • 620eb63 gradle: Do not publish "funTest" feature variants
  • fc55a7b Replace printVersion gradle task with an ORT specific version
  • 0c6934d github: Use the printVersion task to retrieve the ORT version
📖 Documentation
  • 1457512 analyzer: Fix a broken KDoc reference
  • 5607e43 dos: Fix some broken KDoc references
  • 9200a57 scanoss: Fix a broken KDoc references
  • 2901d30 spdx: Trivially improve the name of a test
🔧 Chores
  • 6d3031f bazel: Make use of a default value
  • 1c0d990 commands: Drop an unnecessary @OptIn
  • 22fc4b0 maven: Drop a redundant Companion reference
  • 4e183ff model: Allow the vcsPath receiver to be null
  • fa0a975 model: Name a boolean argument
  • c830d6f scanoss: Determine the snippet license only once
  • 611c2a5 spdx: Simplify two fallback conditions
🚀 Dependency Updates
  • 64a9162 update aws-java-sdk-v2 monorepo to v2.31.48
  • 8076f0d update org.gradle.toolchains.foojay-resolver-convention to v1
🚜 Refactorings
  • 918be70 scanoss: Improve snippet location pairing with direct mapping
  • 3c5ead0 scanoss: Rename variables for better path distinction
  • 4b0751c spdx-document: Move data validation to dedicated functions

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot requested review from a team as code owners May 22, 2025 12:20
@sschuberth sschuberth enabled auto-merge (rebase) May 22, 2025 12:31
@sschuberth sschuberth merged commit e2f14f5 into main May 22, 2025
2 checks passed
@sschuberth sschuberth deleted the renovate/ort branch May 22, 2025 12:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant