-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
Fix zfs_get_data access to files with wrong generation #11682
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Maybe a newb question because I am not familiar with the concept of ZPL generations but: What if the destroy + mkdir happens in the same txg? Wouldn't the generation number be the same? |
@problame |
While I can't vouch for its correctness, I've been running with this PR for a week or two now with no apparent ill effects. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice job running this down. The fix itself makes good sense to me, I just wonder if we want to give it a more clear name since private2 is only ever used as a generation number.
If TX_WRITE is create on a file, and the file is later deleted and a new directory is created on the same object id, it is possible that when zil_commit happens, zfs_get_data will be called on the new directory. This may result in panic as it tries to do range lock. This patch fixes this issue by record the generation number during zfs_log_write, so zfs_get_data can check if the object is valid. Signed-off-by: Chunwei Chen <[email protected]> Closes openzfs#10593 Change-Id: I07307002ad3e0a7de577bab487dc11c447645a83
17ebb12
to
a3494fa
Compare
If TX_WRITE is create on a file, and the file is later deleted and a new directory is created on the same object id, it is possible that when zil_commit happens, zfs_get_data will be called on the new directory. This may result in panic as it tries to do range lock. This patch fixes this issue by record the generation number during zfs_log_write, so zfs_get_data can check if the object is valid. Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Chunwei Chen <[email protected]> Closes openzfs#10593 Closes openzfs#11682
If TX_WRITE is create on a file, and the file is later deleted and a new directory is created on the same object id, it is possible that when zil_commit happens, zfs_get_data will be called on the new directory. This may result in panic as it tries to do range lock. This patch fixes this issue by record the generation number during zfs_log_write, so zfs_get_data can check if the object is valid. Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Chunwei Chen <[email protected]> Closes openzfs#10593 Closes openzfs#11682
If TX_WRITE is create on a file, and the file is later deleted and a new directory is created on the same object id, it is possible that when zil_commit happens, zfs_get_data will be called on the new directory. This may result in panic as it tries to do range lock. This patch fixes this issue by record the generation number during zfs_log_write, so zfs_get_data can check if the object is valid. Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Chunwei Chen <[email protected]> Closes openzfs#10593 Closes openzfs#11682
I can't find this in 2.0.5-staging. @tonyhutter |
If TX_WRITE is create on a file, and the file is later deleted and a new directory is created on the same object id, it is possible that when zil_commit happens, zfs_get_data will be called on the new directory. This may result in panic as it tries to do range lock. This patch fixes this issue by record the generation number during zfs_log_write, so zfs_get_data can check if the object is valid. Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Chunwei Chen <[email protected]> Closes openzfs#10593 Closes openzfs#11682
If TX_WRITE is create on a file, and the file is later deleted and a new directory is created on the same object id, it is possible that when zil_commit happens, zfs_get_data will be called on the new directory. This may result in panic as it tries to do range lock. This patch fixes this issue by record the generation number during zfs_log_write, so zfs_get_data can check if the object is valid. Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Chunwei Chen <[email protected]> Closes openzfs#10593 Closes openzfs#11682
If TX_WRITE is create on a file, and the file is later deleted and a new directory is created on the same object id, it is possible that when zil_commit happens, zfs_get_data will be called on the new directory. This may result in panic as it tries to do range lock. This patch fixes this issue by record the generation number during zfs_log_write, so zfs_get_data can check if the object is valid. Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Chunwei Chen <[email protected]> Closes #10593 Closes #11682
If TX_WRITE is create on a file, and the file is later deleted and a new directory is created on the same object id, it is possible that when zil_commit happens, zfs_get_data will be called on the new directory. This may result in panic as it tries to do range lock. This patch fixes this issue by record the generation number during zfs_log_write, so zfs_get_data can check if the object is valid. Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Chunwei Chen <[email protected]> Closes #10593 Closes #11682
Motivation and Context
Description
If TX_WRITE is create on a file, and the file is later deleted and a new
directory is created on the same object id, it is possible that when
zil_commit happens, zfs_get_data will be called on the new directory.
This may result in panic as it tries to do range lock.
This patch fixes this issue by record the generation number during
zfs_log_write, so zfs_get_data can check if the object is valid.
Signed-off-by: Chunwei Chen [email protected]
Closes #10593
How Has This Been Tested?
Types of changes
Checklist:
Signed-off-by
.