Skip to content

[release-4.17] OCPBUGS-38346: Revert "use update only secret-apply for cert rotation logic" #1774

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: release-4.17
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

openshift-cherrypick-robot

This is an automated cherry-pick of #1773

/assign vrutkovs

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-38335 has been cloned as Jira Issue OCPBUGS-38346. Will retitle bug to link to clone.
/retitle [release-4.17] OCPBUGS-38346: Revert "use update only secret-apply for cert rotation logic"

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #1773

/assign vrutkovs

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot changed the title [release-4.17] OCPBUGS-38335: Revert "use update only secret-apply for cert rotation logic" [release-4.17] OCPBUGS-38346: Revert "use update only secret-apply for cert rotation logic" Aug 12, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Aug 12, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-38346, which is invalid:

  • release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required"
  • expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-38335 to be in one of the following states: MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED, but it is POST instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #1773

/assign vrutkovs

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Nov 11, 2024
@openshift-bot
Copy link

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle rotten
/remove-lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Dec 11, 2024
@openshift-bot
Copy link

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.

Reopen the issue by commenting /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Exclude this issue from closing again by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

/close

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot closed this Jan 11, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 11, 2025

@openshift-bot: Closed this PR.

In response to this:

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.

Reopen the issue by commenting /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Exclude this issue from closing again by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-38346. The bug has been updated to no longer refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. All external bug links have been closed. The bug has been moved to the NEW state.

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #1773

/assign vrutkovs

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@wangke19
Copy link

/reopen

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot reopened this Jun 27, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 27, 2025

@wangke19: Reopened this PR.

In response to this:

/reopen

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-38346, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-38335 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but it is POST instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #1773

/assign vrutkovs

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 27, 2025

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@wangke19
Copy link

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 30, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 30, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: openshift-cherrypick-robot, wangke19
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign deads2k for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@wangke19
Copy link

wangke19 commented Jul 1, 2025

/assign @p0lyn0mial

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants