Skip to content

CORS-4053: Migrate AWS SDK to v2 in cluster/aws #9762

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

barbacbd
Copy link
Contributor

** The IAM, EC2, and Route53 clients were moved to SDK v2. This included migration from session to config (and use of endpoints).

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label May 29, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented May 29, 2025

@barbacbd: This pull request references CORS-4053 which is a valid jira issue.

In response to this:

** The IAM, EC2, and Route53 clients were moved to SDK v2. This included migration from session to config (and use of endpoints).

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from patrickdillon and tthvo May 29, 2025 20:07
Copy link
Member

@tthvo tthvo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great! I have a few questions only :D

if err != nil {
return errors.Wrap(err, "could not create AWS session")
return fmt.Errorf("failed loading default config: %w", err)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: Another place to change to failed to load AWS config while you are at it haha

@barbacbd barbacbd force-pushed the CORS-4053 branch 2 times, most recently from 53fdfc0 to fb6f62c Compare June 2, 2025 19:08
@barbacbd
Copy link
Contributor Author

barbacbd commented Jun 2, 2025

/label platform/aws

** The IAM, EC2, and Route53 clients were moved to SDK v2. This included migration from
session to config (and use of endpoints).
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 2, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign patrickdillon for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Copy link
Member

@tthvo tthvo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 2, 2025
@tthvo
Copy link
Member

tthvo commented Jun 2, 2025

/retest

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 3, 2025

@barbacbd: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn dd6e683 link false /test okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn
ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn-multi-network dd6e683 link false /test e2e-vsphere-ovn-multi-network
ci/prow/e2e-aws-private dd6e683 link false /test e2e-aws-private
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-single-node dd6e683 link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-single-node

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. platform/aws
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants