[release-4.5] Bug 1884464: pkv/cvo/status: Raise Operator leveling grace-period to 40 minutes #465

openshift-cherrypick-robot · 2020-10-02T04:34:32Z

This is an automated cherry-pick of #464

/assign sdodson

Similar to openshift#422, further tune things up so that we can ensure that our 90th percentile of clusters do not trip over momentary cluster upgrade failures whenever operators take longer than 20 minutes to roll out.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-10-02T04:34:41Z

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Bugzilla bug 1884334 has been cloned as Bugzilla bug 1884464. Retitling PR to link against new bug.
/retitle [release-4.5] Bug 1884464: pkv/cvo/status: Raise Operator leveling grace-period to 40 minutes

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-10-02T04:35:00Z

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1884464, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1884334 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is MODIFIED instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

wking · 2020-10-02T05:24:51Z

/lgtm

Will be blocked until QE verifies the 4.6 change.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-10-02T05:25:07Z

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: openshift-cherrypick-robot, wking

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

~~OWNERS~~ [wking]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

openshift-bot · 2020-10-02T05:39:12Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2020-10-03T01:00:45Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-10-03T01:00:49Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1884464, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1884334 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2020-10-04T01:00:37Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-10-04T01:00:41Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1884464, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1884334 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2020-10-05T01:00:38Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-10-05T01:00:41Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1884464, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1884334 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2020-10-06T01:00:17Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-10-06T01:00:21Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1884464, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1884334 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2020-10-07T01:00:27Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-10-07T01:00:34Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1884464, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1884334 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2020-10-08T01:01:10Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-10-08T01:01:13Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1884464, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1884334 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2020-10-09T01:00:26Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-10-09T01:00:37Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1884464, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1884334 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-10-12T01:00:42Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1884464, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1884334 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2020-10-13T01:00:35Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-10-13T01:00:42Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1884464, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1884334 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ASSIGNED instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2020-10-14T01:00:20Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-10-14T01:00:36Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1884464, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1884334 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ASSIGNED instead
expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1884334 to target a release in 4.6.0, 4.6.z, but it targets "4.7.0" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2020-10-15T01:00:56Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-10-15T01:00:59Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1884464, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1884334 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ASSIGNED instead
expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1884334 to target a release in 4.6.0, 4.6.z, but it targets "4.7.0" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2020-10-16T01:00:20Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-10-16T01:00:38Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1884464, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1884334 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ASSIGNED instead
expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1884334 to target a release in 4.6.0, 4.6.z, but it targets "4.7.0" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2020-10-17T01:01:12Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-10-17T01:01:15Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1884464, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1884334 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ASSIGNED instead
expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1884334 to target a release in 4.6.0, 4.6.z, but it targets "4.7.0" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2020-10-20T01:00:40Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-10-20T01:00:43Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1884464, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1884334 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ASSIGNED instead
expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1884334 to target a release in 4.6.0, 4.6.z, but it targets "4.7.0" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2020-10-21T01:01:21Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-10-21T01:01:25Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1884464, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1884334 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ASSIGNED instead
expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1884334 to target a release in 4.6.0, 4.6.z, but it targets "4.7.0" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2020-10-22T01:00:40Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-10-22T01:00:49Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1884464, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1884334 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ASSIGNED instead
expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1884334 to target a release in 4.6.0, 4.6.z, but it targets "4.7.0" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2020-10-23T01:01:23Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-10-23T01:01:27Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1884464, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1884334 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ASSIGNED instead
expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1884334 to target a release in 4.6.0, 4.6.z, but it targets "4.7.0" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2020-10-23T10:56:03Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2020-10-23T12:14:05Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2020-10-23T13:31:57Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2020-10-24T01:01:02Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-10-24T01:01:06Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1884464, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1884334 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ASSIGNED instead
expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1884334 to target a release in 4.6.0, 4.6.z, but it targets "4.7.0" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2020-10-25T01:00:46Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-10-25T01:00:50Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1884464, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1884334 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ASSIGNED instead
expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1884334 to target a release in 4.6.0, 4.6.z, but it targets "4.7.0" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

wking · 2020-10-25T15:57:19Z

We need a larger refactor. Will revisit backports once we have a complete fix.

/close

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-10-25T15:57:35Z

@wking: Closed this PR.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-10-25T15:57:41Z

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1884464. The bug has been updated to no longer refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. All external bug links have been closed. The bug has been moved to the NEW state.

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

pkv/cvo/status: Raise Operator leveling grace-period to 40 minutes

ea86b21

Similar to openshift#422, further tune things up so that we can ensure that our 90th percentile of clusters do not trip over momentary cluster upgrade failures whenever operators take longer than 20 minutes to roll out.

openshift-ci-robot assigned sdodson Oct 2, 2020

openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Oct 2, 2020

Bug 1884334: pkv/cvo/status: Raise Operator leveling grace-period to 40 minutes #464

Merged

openshift-ci-robot requested review from abhinavdahiya and wking October 2, 2020 04:34

openshift-ci-robot changed the title ~~[release-4.5] Bug 1884334: pkv/cvo/status: Raise Operator leveling grace-period to 40 minutes~~ [release-4.5] Bug 1884464: pkv/cvo/status: Raise Operator leveling grace-period to 40 minutes Oct 2, 2020

openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. label Oct 2, 2020

openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Oct 2, 2020

openshift-ci-robot assigned wking Oct 2, 2020

openshift-ci-robot added lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Oct 2, 2020

openshift-ci-robot closed this Oct 25, 2020

[release-4.5] Bug 1884464: pkv/cvo/status: Raise Operator leveling grace-period to 40 minutes #465

[release-4.5] Bug 1884464: pkv/cvo/status: Raise Operator leveling grace-period to 40 minutes #465

Uh oh!

Conversation

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Oct 2, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 2, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 2, 2020

Uh oh!

wking commented Oct 2, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 2, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Oct 2, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Oct 3, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 3, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Oct 4, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 4, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Oct 5, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 5, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Oct 6, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 6, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Oct 7, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 7, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Oct 8, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 8, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Oct 9, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 9, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 12, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Oct 13, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 13, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Oct 14, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 14, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Oct 15, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 15, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Oct 16, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 16, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Oct 17, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 17, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Oct 20, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 20, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Oct 21, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 21, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Oct 22, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 22, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Oct 23, 2020

Uh oh!