Skip to content

Introducing the score ranker processor #899

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 19, 2025

Conversation

hkohlsaat
Copy link
Contributor

Description

The score ranker processor that was introduced in OpenSearch 2.19 is not yet supported/defined. Only the normalization processor is supported. This PR introduces the score ranker processor into the specification.

Issues Resolved

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented May 19, 2025

Changes Analysis

Commit SHA: 54ba69d
Comparing To SHA: d8de5e5

API Changes

Summary

└─┬Components
  ├──[➕] schemas (63943:7)
  ├──[➕] schemas (63932:7)
  ├──[➕] schemas (63947:7)
  └─┬search_pipeline._common___PhaseResultsProcessor
    └──[➕] oneOf (63747:11)

Document Element Total Changes Breaking Changes
components 4 0
  • Total Changes: 4
  • Additions: 4

Report

The full API changes report is available at: https://github.com/opensearch-project/opensearch-api-specification/actions/runs/15120578340/artifacts/3154197387

API Coverage

Before After Δ
Covered (%) 663 (64.94 %) 663 (64.94 %) 0 (0 %)
Uncovered (%) 358 (35.06 %) 358 (35.06 %) 0 (0 %)
Unknown 61 61 0

hkohlsaat added 2 commits May 19, 2025 20:30
Signed-off-by: Hannes Kohlsaat <[email protected]>
Copy link
Contributor

Spec Test Coverage Analysis

Total Tested
611 609 (99.67 %)

@Xtansia Xtansia merged commit 302c1d3 into opensearch-project:main May 19, 2025
32 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants