[PRE REVIEW]: MaDaTS: Managing Data on Tiered Storage for Scientific Workflows

[whedon]

Submitting author: @dghoshal-lbl (Devarshi Ghoshal)
Repository: https://github.com/dghoshal-lbl/madats
Version: v1.1.2
Editor: @danielskatz
Reviewers: @ian-taylor, @gflofst

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS dghoshal-lbl. The JOSS editor (shown at the top of this issue) will work with you on this issue to find a reviewer for your submission before creating the main review issue.

dghoshal-lbl if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread. In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Hello human, I'm @whedon. I'm here to help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

[whedon]

PDF failed to compile for issue #807 with the following error:

/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.3.0/bundler/gems/whedon-e0f72c5e8125/lib/whedon.rb:83:in check_fields': Paper YAML header is missing expected fields: affiliations (RuntimeError) from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.3.0/bundler/gems/whedon-e0f72c5e8125/lib/whedon.rb:69:in initialize'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.3.0/bundler/gems/whedon-e0f72c5e8125/lib/whedon/processor.rb:32:in new' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.3.0/bundler/gems/whedon-e0f72c5e8125/lib/whedon/processor.rb:32:in set_paper'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.3.0/bundler/gems/whedon-e0f72c5e8125/bin/whedon:37:in prepare' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.3.0/gems/thor-0.20.0/lib/thor/command.rb:27:in run'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.3.0/gems/thor-0.20.0/lib/thor/invocation.rb:126:in invoke_command' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.3.0/gems/thor-0.20.0/lib/thor.rb:387:in dispatch'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.3.0/gems/thor-0.20.0/lib/thor/base.rb:466:in start' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.3.0/bundler/gems/whedon-e0f72c5e8125/bin/whedon:99:in <top (required)>'
from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.3.0/bin/whedon:22:in load' from /app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.3.0/bin/whedon:22:in

'

[arfon]

@dghoshal-lbl - please take a look at the example paper again and fix up the YAML header.

[dghoshal-lbl]

Hi @arfon - I have fixed the header and pushed in the changes.

[arfon]

@whedon generate pdf

[whedon]

Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

[whedon]

--> Check article proof 📄 <--

[arfon]

@danielskatz - is this something you might be interested in editing?

[danielskatz]

If the authors are ok with me editing, I'm happy to. (There's a small possibility of an informal conflict, though not a formal one according to the JOSS guidelines.)

@dghoshal-lbl - what do you think?

[dghoshal-lbl]

@danielskatz I am fine with you being the editor. However, I am not sure if there is a possibility of a conflict.

[danielskatz]

It's not a formal conflict, so let's not worry about it as long as you are ok with me doing this, which you are.

@dghoshal-lbl - can you suggest potential reviewers? In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission.

[danielskatz]

@whedon assign @danielskatz as editor

[whedon]

OK, the editor is @danielskatz

[dghoshal-lbl]

@danielskatz I am not sure if I have a good idea of who can be the potential reviewers. Since the code is in Python, I think anyone who has a working knowledge of Python can review this. Last time, I submitted a Python software to JOSS, I think @krother was the reviewer.

[danielskatz]

The potential reviewers don't have to be from the list of reviewers - you can give me suggestions of others as well. For example, if you were submitting a paper on this to a conference, who would you want to review it?

[dghoshal-lbl]

@danielskatz If there are no potential reviewers assigned to this, one suggestion is: Jay Lofstead (http://www.lofstead.org/)

[danielskatz]

Thanks @dghoshal-lbl - I'll check with Jay. I've also been trying to find a number of other people through email, but without success so far.

[danielskatz]

@whedon assign @ian-taylor as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, the reviewer is @ian-taylor

[danielskatz]

I'm still looking for one more reviewer before I start the review. In addition, @ian-taylor is not available until the 2nd week of August, so this isn't delaying the review.

[danielskatz]

@whedon add @gflofst as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, @gflofst is now a reviewer

[danielskatz]

@whedon start review

[whedon]

OK, I've started the review over in #830. Feel free to close this issue now!

[danielskatz]

yeah, no bananas any more!!! 🎆

[arfon]

yeah, no bananas any more!!! 🎆

😁