[PRE REVIEW]: Vivid Volcano: Empowering Non-Bioinformaticians to Analyze Pre-Processed Omics Data

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @DatViseR (Tomasz Stępkowski)
Repository: https://github.com/DatViseR/Vivid-Volcano
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): master
Version: Version: 0.1.0
Editor: @lpantano
Reviewers: @shrestha-c, @sharvarinarendra
Managing EiC: Kevin M. Moerman

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/4114ee31d0c37ea30d0d79d27d76d310"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/4114ee31d0c37ea30d0d79d27d76d310/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/4114ee31d0c37ea30d0d79d27d76d310/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/4114ee31d0c37ea30d0d79d27d76d310)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @DatViseR. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@DatViseR if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

✅ OK DOIs

- 10.1093/bib/bbw114 is OK

🟡 SKIP DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: shiny: Web Application Framework for R
- No DOI given, and none found for title: ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis
- No DOI given, and none found for title: gt: Easily Create Presentation-Ready Display Table...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: dplyr: A Grammar of Data Manipulation

❌ MISSING DOIs

- 10.32614/cran.package.shiny.semantic may be a valid DOI for title: shiny.semantic: Semantic UI Support for Shiny
- 10.32614/cran.package.dt may be a valid DOI for title: DT: A Wrapper of the JavaScript Library ’DataTable...
- 10.1201/9780429447273 may be a valid DOI for title: Interactive Web-Based Data Visualization with R, p...
- 10.32614/cran.package.shinyjs may be a valid DOI for title: shinyjs: Easily Improve the User Experience of You...
- 10.32614/cran.package.shinyalert may be a valid DOI for title: shinyalert: Easily Create Pretty Popup Messages (M...
- 10.32614/cran.package.tidyr may be a valid DOI for title: tidyr: Tidy Messy Data

❌ INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.98  T=0.59 s (52.8 files/s, 479555.3 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CSV                              3              0              0         263123
R                               12           1445           2466           6431
JSON                             2              0              0           4480
SVG                              2              1              1            821
HTML                             2            166             10            726
CSS                              1            206            102            602
Markdown                         5             96              0            336
JavaScript                       1             32             25            164
TeX                              1             11              0             84
YAML                             2              6              2             21
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            31           1963           2606         276788
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

   301	DatViseR
     3	Tomasz Stępkowski

[editorialbot]

Paper file info:

⚠️ Wordcount for paper.md is 1382

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

[editorialbot]

License info:

🟡 License found: Other (Check here for OSI approval)

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

microViz: an R package for microbiome data visualization and statistics
Submitting author: @david-barnett
Handling editor: @lpantano (Active)
Reviewers: @marypiper, @yoonjeongcha
Similarity score: 0.7268

Viime: Visualization and Integration of Metabolomics Experiments
Submitting author: @waxlamp
Handling editor: @lpantano (Active)
Reviewers: @joannawolthuis, @rowlandm, @jkanche
Similarity score: 0.7164

proteoDA: a package for quantitative proteomics
Submitting author: @ByrumLab
Handling editor: @jmschrei (Active)
Reviewers: @shahmoradi, @MohmedSoudy
Similarity score: 0.7113

StatAid: An R package with a graphical user interface for data analysis
Submitting author: @VincentAlcazer
Handling editor: @mikldk (Retired)
Reviewers: @nistara, @adithirgis
Similarity score: 0.7093

dtrackr: An R package for tracking the provenance of data
Submitting author: @robchallen
Handling editor: @ajstewartlang (Active)
Reviewers: @debruine, @craig-willis
Similarity score: 0.7089

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[DatViseR]

@DatViseR if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Dear Editors,
Looking at the provided list of current JOSS reviewers and their areas of expertise I suggest the following reviewers for my application :

Name	GitHub	Affiliation	Email	Expertise
Dr Sehrish Kanwal	skanwal	The University of Melbourne	[email protected]	Bioinformatics, Cancer Sciences, Genomics, Transcriptomics
Vineela Gangalapudi	vinegang	Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (NIH)	[email protected]	Bioinformatics Pipelines, Genomics, Machine Learning, Cancer Biology
Gurpreet Kaur	gurpreet-bioinfo	University of Alabama at Birmingham (USA)	[email protected]	Bioinformatics, Computational Biology, Genomics, Tools, Pipelines
Rohit Farmer	rohitfarmer	National Institutes of Health	[email protected]	Bioinformatics, Computational Biology, Genomics, Proteomics
Prof. Julia Fukuyama	jfukuyama	Indiana University Bloomington	[email protected]	Statistics, Graphics, Visualization, Biological Data Analysis
Jesko Wagner	jeskowagner	University of Edinburgh	[email protected]	Bioinformatics, Biological Image Analysis, DNA and RNA Sequencing

Outside of the JOSS list I suggest Professor Aleksander Jankowski, an assistant professor of computer science at Warsaw University and an expert bioinformatitian, R programmer and omics data statistician.
Personal Page: https://www.mimuw.edu.pl/~ajank/ email: [email protected]

P.S I will try to find the DOIs to the all referenced libraries whenever possible.

Regards,
Tomasz Stępkowski

[lpantano]

@editorialbot add me as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @lpantano is now the editor

[lpantano]

@editorialbot add @shrestha-c as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@shrestha-c added to the reviewers list!

[shrestha-c]

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello @shrestha-c, here are the things you can ask me to do:

# List all available commands
@editorialbot commands

# Get a list of all editors's GitHub handles
@editorialbot list editors

# Adds a checklist for the reviewer using this command
@editorialbot generate my checklist

# Set a value for branch
@editorialbot set joss-paper as branch

# Run checks and provide information on the repository and the paper file
@editorialbot check repository

# Check the references of the paper for missing DOIs
@editorialbot check references

# Generates the pdf paper
@editorialbot generate pdf

# Generates a LaTeX preprint file
@editorialbot generate preprint

# Get a link to the complete list of reviewers
@editorialbot list reviewers

[shrestha-c]

@editorialbot check references

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

✅ OK DOIs

- 10.1093/bib/bbw114 is OK

🟡 SKIP DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: shiny: Web Application Framework for R
- No DOI given, and none found for title: ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis
- No DOI given, and none found for title: gt: Easily Create Presentation-Ready Display Table...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: dplyr: A Grammar of Data Manipulation

❌ MISSING DOIs

- 10.32614/cran.package.shiny.semantic may be a valid DOI for title: shiny.semantic: Semantic UI Support for Shiny
- 10.32614/cran.package.dt may be a valid DOI for title: DT: A Wrapper of the JavaScript Library ’DataTable...
- 10.1201/9780429447273 may be a valid DOI for title: Interactive Web-Based Data Visualization with R, p...
- 10.32614/cran.package.shinyjs may be a valid DOI for title: shinyjs: Easily Improve the User Experience of You...
- 10.32614/cran.package.shinyalert may be a valid DOI for title: shinyalert: Easily Create Pretty Popup Messages (M...
- 10.32614/cran.package.tidyr may be a valid DOI for title: tidyr: Tidy Messy Data

❌ INVALID DOIs

- None

[lpantano]

@editorialbot add @sharvarinarendra as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@sharvarinarendra added to the reviewers list!

[lpantano]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in #8055.