[PRE REVIEW]: MartiniGlass: a tool for enabling visualisation of coarse-grained Martini topologies

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @csbrasnett (Christopher Brasnett)
Repository: https://github.com/Martini-Force-Field-Initiative/MartiniGlass
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): JOSS
Version: v1.0.0
Editor: Pending
Reviewers: Pending
Managing EiC: Kevin M. Moerman

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/1812b59ce0cb111c3fb608cdfadda7ad"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/1812b59ce0cb111c3fb608cdfadda7ad/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/1812b59ce0cb111c3fb608cdfadda7ad/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/1812b59ce0cb111c3fb608cdfadda7ad)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @csbrasnett. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@csbrasnett if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

✅ OK DOIs

- 10.1002/wcms.1620 is OK
- 10.1021/acs.jctc.2c00757 is OK
- 10.1038/s41592-021-01098-3 is OK
- 10.1016/j.softx.2015.06.001 is OK
- 10.1021/acs.jctc.2c00796 is OK
- 10.48550/arXiv.2212.01191 is OK
- 10.1021/acs.jctc.3c00733 is OK
- 10.1016/j.bpj.2023.10.016 is OK
- 10.1101/2024.04.15.589479 is OK
- 10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5 is OK
- 10.1021/acs.jctc.3c00547 is OK
- 10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c06521 is OK
- 10.1021/ct9002114 is OK
- 10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00286 is OK
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0187936 is OK
- 10.1093/nar/gkv402 is OK
- 10.1021/acs.jcim.2c01375 is OK
- 10.1021/acs.jctc.4c00553 is OK

🟡 SKIP DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: CG bonds
- No DOI given, and none found for title: The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Version 1.8

❌ MISSING DOIs

- None

❌ INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.02 s (988.9 files/s, 214760.8 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tcl/Tk                           5            517            856           2197
Python                          13            123            293            454
TeX                              1             20              0            327
Markdown                         2             72              0            289
YAML                             1              1              4             23
Bourne Shell                     1              8             12              9
TOML                             1              0              0              7
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            24            741           1165           3306
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

    54	csbrasnett
    15	Chris Brasnett

[editorialbot]

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 2007

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

[editorialbot]

License info:

✅ License found: Apache License 2.0 (Valid open source OSI approved license)

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

pyrexMD: Workflow-Orientated Python Package for Replica Exchange Molecular Dynamics
Submitting author: @ArtVoro
Handling editor: @jgostick (Active)
Reviewers: @janash, @rosecers, @jarvist
Similarity score: 0.6709

Project RACCOON: Automated construction of PDB files for polymers and polymer peptide conjugates
Submitting author: @moritzobenauer
Handling editor: @jromanowska (Active)
Reviewers: @taoliu032, @lorenzo-rovigatti
Similarity score: 0.6608

Chitin Builder: a VMD tool for the generation of structures of chitin molecular crystals for atomistic simulations
Submitting author: @jfaraudo
Handling editor: @majensen (Active)
Reviewers: @amoeba, @tonigi
Similarity score: 0.6520

BioSimSpace: An interoperable Python framework for biomolecular simulation
Submitting author: @lohedges
Handling editor: @will-rowe (Retired)
Reviewers: @amritagos, @richardjgowers
Similarity score: 0.6453

pygen-structures: A Python package to generate 3D molecular structures for simulations using the CHARMM forcefield
Submitting author: @thesketh
Handling editor: @richardjgowers (Active)
Reviewers: @dotsdl, @rmeli, @amandadumi
Similarity score: 0.6392

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[csbrasnett]

Suggestions for reviewers:

Matthieu Chavent (MChavent)
Giulio Tesei (gitesei)
Dheeraj Prakaash (DJ004)
Phill Stansfeld (pstansfeld)
Phil Biggin (philbiggin)
Hubert Santuz (HubLot)
Szilárd Páll (pszi1ard)

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@csbrasnett thanks for your submission to JOSS. Unfortunately, after reviewing this submission we've determined that this submission doesn't meet our substantial scholarly effort criterion. We will therefore proceed to reject this submission. Note that this conclusion does not mean the work is not useful or of a poor quality, it merely means that based on the relatively small size, and the constrained functionality, the work is not in scope for JOSS.

One possible alternative to JOSS is to follow GitHub's guide on how to create a permanent archive and DOI for your software. This DOI can then be used by others to cite your work.

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

@editorialbot reject

[editorialbot]

Paper rejected.