[PRE REVIEW]: XGI: A Python package for higher-order interaction networks #5125
Comments
editorialbot
added
pre-review
Track: 7 (CSISM)
|
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks. For a list of things I can do to help you, just type: For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type: |
|
|
Wordcount for |
|
|
@nwlandry - thanks for your submission. I see that your paper is ~2500 words, which far beyond the JOSS suggestion of ~1000. Please take a look at the JOSS example paper for what a JOSS paper should contain, and remove some of your current content (eg the API description). Perhaps some parts can be put in the repo and pointed at, or in the documentation? Please feel free to make changes to your .md file, then use the command Once this is done, please let me know, and I'll then work on finding an editor for this submission. |
|
Hi @danielskatz - thank you for the feedback and sorry about that! That sounds good to me! |
|
|
Wordcount for |
|
@editorialbot generate pdf |
|
@editorialbot generate pdf |
|
@editorialbot check repository |
|
|
Wordcount for |
|
@editorialbot generate pdf |
|
@editorialbot generate pdf |
|
@editorialbot check repository |
|
|
Wordcount for |
|
@editorialbot check repository |
|
@editorialbot generate pdf |
|
📄 Preprint file created: Find it here in the Artifacts list 📄 |
It looks good to me, thanks! Since I am not an expert in high-order networks, I found the following two introductory references very useful: |
|
Great! These are good references indeed. Another one, open access and by some authors of this manuscript: |
|
👋 @tbsexton, @jGaboardi, @jonjoncardoso, @zoometh, @akbaritabar would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html |
I am currently unavailable (for the next couple of months), I am sorry. |
|
Not sure I understand what is this all about :)
Regards,
S.R.S. Iyengar
…On Wed, 8 Feb 2023 at 14:52, Vissarion Fisikopoulos < ***@***.***> wrote:
👋 @sudarshansudarshan <https://github.com/sudarshansudarshan>,
@saurabh-khanna <https://github.com/saurabh-khanna>, @manmeetkaurbaxi
<https://github.com/manmeetkaurbaxi>, would any of you be willing to
review this submission for JOSS?
We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow
these guidelines:
https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#5125 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AC6XQIOBEOBGJ75YOZABN53WWNQUTANCNFSM6AAAAAAUQNTVMQ>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
--
**CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The
contents of this email message and any
attachments are intended solely
for the addressee(s) and may contain
confidential and/or privileged
information and may be legally protected
from disclosure. If you are not
the intended recipient of this message or
their agent, or if this
message has been addressed to you in error, please
immediately alert the
sender by reply email and then delete this message
and any attachments.
If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any
use, dissemination, copying, or storage of this message
or its
attachments is strictly prohibited.*
*
|
|
@vissarion, I currently do not have the bandwidth to give a proper review. Sorry, and please keep me in mind for future reviews. |
|
@vissarion currently I'm overwhelmed with work and classes, I have to decline, sorry |
|
Same for me, unfortunately.
This project sounds super exciting, I would love to be able to review it,
but I'm swamped at the moment. I won't have the mind space to dedicate the
attention it deserves.
…On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 at 09:22, Thomas Huet ***@***.***> wrote:
@vissarion <https://github.com/vissarion> currently I'm overwhelmed with
work and classes, I have to decline, sorry
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#5125 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAG2Z7TE5HAJB4SXWE2YGRLWXSN5DANCNFSM6AAAAAAUQNTVMQ>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
--
*Dr. Jon Cardoso-Silva <https://github.com/jonjoncardoso>*
Assistant Professorial Lecturer
Data Science Institute
*L*ondon *S*chool of *E*conomics and Political Science
|
|
Some potential reviewers (if it's helpful): dschult, MridulS, jarrodmillman, rossbar, count0, arashbm. |
|
👋 @dschult, @MridulS, @jarrodmillman, @rossbar, @count0, @arashbm would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? We carry out our checklist-driven reviews here in GitHub issues and follow these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html |
|
I'd be happy to review this submission. |
|
@editorialbot add @arashbm as reviewer |
|
@arashbm added to the reviewers list! |
|
Thanks @arashbm ! I am waiting for one more reviewer now to start the review process. |
|
I can help review this submission too :) |
|
Hi there, I'd definitely be interested, this looks right up my alley. Thanks! |
|
@editorialbot add @MridulS as reviewer |
|
@MridulS added to the reviewers list! |
|
@editorialbot add @tbsexton as reviewer |
|
@tbsexton added to the reviewers list! |
|
Thanks to all of you, I will start now the review process with 3 reviewers. |
|
@editorialbot start review |
|
OK, I've started the review over in #5162. |
Submitting author: @nwlandry (Nicholas Landry)
Repository: https://github.com/ComplexGroupInteractions/xgi
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): paper
Version: v0.5.4
Editor: @vissarion
Reviewers: @arashbm, @MridulS, @tbsexton
Managing EiC: Daniel S. Katz
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @nwlandry. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@nwlandry if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission (please start at the bottom of the list).
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: