[PRE REVIEW]: MTEX2Gmsh: a tool for generating 2D meshes from EBSD data

[whedon]

Submitting author: @DorianDepriester (Dorian Depriester)
Repository: https://github.com/DorianDepriester/mtex2Gmsh
Version: v1.0
Editor: @meg-simula
Reviewers: streeve, @ralfHielscher

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @DorianDepriester. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@DorianDepriester if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf

What happens now?

This submission is currently in a pre-review state which means we are waiting for an editor to be assigned and for them to find some reviewers for your submission. This may take anything between a few hours to a couple of weeks. Thanks for your patience 😸

You can help the editor by looking at this list of potential reviewers to identify individuals who might be able to review your submission (please start at the bottom of the list). Also, feel free to suggest individuals who are not on this list by mentioning their GitHub handles here.

[whedon]

Attempting to check references...

[whedon]

Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

[arfon]

👋 @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman - the submitting author suggested you as the handling editor.

[whedon]

OK DOIs

- 10.1088/0965-0393/24/5/055014 is OK
- 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.02.001 is OK
- 10.1016/0956-7151(94)90452-9 is OK
- 10.1364/AO.41.006815 is OK
- 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.10.030 is OK
- 10.1002/nme.2579 is OK
- 10.1016/j.ultramic.2011.08.002 is OK

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

[whedon]

👉 Check article proof 📄 👈

[DorianDepriester]

Dear all,
As potential reviewers, I suggest:

• streeve
• IgorBaratta
• ralfHielscher (not in the list of JOSS' reviewers)
• lheagy
• WalBytes

Regards.

[DorianDepriester]

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Here are some things you can ask me to do:

# List Whedon's capabilities
@whedon commands

# List of editor GitHub usernames
@whedon list editors

# List of reviewers together with programming language preferences and domain expertise
@whedon list reviewers

EDITORIAL TASKS

# Compile the paper
@whedon generate pdf

# Compile the paper from alternative branch
@whedon generate pdf from branch custom-branch-name

# Ask Whedon to check the references for missing DOIs
@whedon check references

[labarba]

👋 @meg-simula — Could you handle this submission as editor?
The author suggested @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman, but he is handling 5 papers right now.
Check out the article proof.

[meg-simula]

I would be happy to, but I am out of office until Mon Jan 6 2020. If it can wait until then, feel free to assign me.

…

On Fri, Dec 20, 2019, 16:43 Lorena A. Barba ***@***.***> wrote: 👋 @meg-simula <https://github.com/meg-simula> — Could you handle this submission as editor? The author suggested @Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman <https://github.com/Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman>, but he is handling 5 papers right now. Check out the article proof. <https://github.com/openjournals/joss-papers/blob/joss.01963/joss.01963/10.21105.joss.01963.pdf> — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#1963?email_source=notifications&email_token=AAFPESXHVNJTSMQXYEKUAI3QZTRZJA5CNFSM4J4LQ4Y2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEHNIHZA#issuecomment-567968740>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAFPESXGZ5OKFK6NA2MQWMDQZTRZJANCNFSM4J4LQ4YQ> .

[labarba]

Thanks, @meg-simula ! Yes, all editor assignments this week are carrying this caveat 😁

[labarba]

@whedon assign @meg-simula as editor

[whedon]

OK, the editor is @meg-simula

[Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman]

The reviewers/authors from these submissions might be interested in reviewing:
#1173
#1636
#1370
#1450

[meg-simula]

Hi @DorianDepriester, thank you for the submission! This looks nicely in scope for JOSS.

@lheagy @streeve @ralfHielscher Would you be willing and available to review this submission?

[streeve]

Yes, I'm happy to - this will be my first JOSS review :)

[meg-simula]

Fantastic @streeve, thanks!

[meg-simula]

@whedon assign streeve as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, streeve is now a reviewer

[ralfHielscher]

Hi Marie, I also agree to review. What are the next steps? Ralf. ******************************************************************** Ralf Hielscher Tel: +371-531-38556 Fakultät für Mathematik +371-531-22200 (Sekr.) Technische Universität Chemnitz Fax: +371-531-22109 Reichenhainer Str. 39 E-mail: [email protected] D-09126 Chemnitz http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/~rahi ********************************************************************

…

On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 2:46 PM Marie E. Rognes ***@***.***> wrote: Hi @DorianDepriester <https://github.com/DorianDepriester>, thank you for the submission! This looks nicely in scope for JOSS. @lheagy <https://github.com/lheagy> @streeve <https://github.com/streeve> @ralfHielscher <https://github.com/ralfHielscher> Would you be willing and available to review this submission? — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#1963?email_source=notifications&email_token=ACBYJ2J373TPXTHRVR5X7XDQ5RWBRA5CNFSM4J4LQ4Y2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEIYYGIA#issuecomment-573670176>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACBYJ2I7Q5THSVHHUOGMLNLQ5RWBRANCNFSM4J4LQ4YQ> .

[danielskatz]

👋 @meg-simula - it looks like you have another reviewer ready to go, and can start the review

[meg-simula]

Fantastic, thanks @ralfHielscher, I'll assign you and get the review started.

[meg-simula]

@whedon add @ralfHielscher as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, @ralfHielscher is now a reviewer

[meg-simula]

@whedon start review

[whedon]

OK, I've started the review over in #2094.