Skip to content

[PRE REVIEW]: SampleDB: A sample and measurement metadata database #1949

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
whedon opened this issue Dec 12, 2019 · 29 comments
Closed

[PRE REVIEW]: SampleDB: A sample and measurement metadata database #1949

whedon opened this issue Dec 12, 2019 · 29 comments

Comments

@whedon
Copy link

whedon commented Dec 12, 2019

Submitting author: @FlorianRhiem (Florian Rhiem)
Repository: https://github.com/sciapp/sampledb
Version: v0.8.1
Editor: @trallard
Reviewers: @eteq, @dvanic

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @FlorianRhiem. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@FlorianRhiem if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands
@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Dec 12, 2019

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@whedon generate pdf

What happens now?

This submission is currently in a pre-review state which means we are waiting for an editor to be assigned and for them to find some reviewers for your submission. This may take anything between a few hours to a couple of weeks. Thanks for your patience 😸

You can help the editor by looking at this list of potential reviewers to identify individuals who might be able to review your submission (please start at the bottom of the list). Also, feel free to suggest individuals who are not on this list by mentioning their GitHub handles here.

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Dec 12, 2019

Attempting to check references...

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Dec 12, 2019

Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Dec 12, 2019


OK DOIs

- None

MISSING DOIs

- None

INVALID DOIs

- None

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Dec 12, 2019

@kyleniemeyer
Copy link

Hi @trallard, could you edit this one for us?

@trallard
Copy link
Member

Sure send this my way!

@kyleniemeyer
Copy link

@whedon assign @trallard as editor

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Dec 12, 2019

OK, the editor is @trallard

@trallard
Copy link
Member

Hi @FlorianRhiem 👋 I will be serving as the editor for this submission.
The first thing we have to do is find 2 or more reviewers for this.

Do you already have some folks in mind? if not you can check our list of reviewers available here 👉🏼 https://bit.ly/joss-reviewers

@FlorianRhiem
Copy link

Hello @trallard, I just went through the list and perhaps eteq, usethedata and/or jsta would be willing to review this?

@trallard
Copy link
Member

Ok let's ping the reviewers now ✨

@eteq Erik, would you be able and willing to review this submission?
@usethedata Bruce, would you be able and willing to review this submission?
@jsta Joseph, would you be able and willing to review this submission?

Some important information:

We are looking at finding two reviewers to move this submission forward.

@eteq
Copy link

eteq commented Dec 23, 2019

I can do this review, although it might take some time due to the holidays and related travel/vacation

@FlorianRhiem
Copy link

@eteq Thank you, that would be great! :)

@trallard It's been two weeks, should we wait for a reply from @usethedata or @jsta due to the holidays, or should I look for other reviewer candidates from the google doc?

@jsta
Copy link
Member

jsta commented Jan 3, 2020

@trallard I cannot take on a reviewing task at this time. Best of luck!

@FlorianRhiem
Copy link

@trallard Perhaps celliern, dvanic, remram44, fabianomenegidio and/or atrisovic could do the review?

@FlorianRhiem
Copy link

@trallard May I ping them with an updated version of your comment, will you ping them, or how do we continue? I'm feeling somewhat lost regarding the process at the moment.

@trallard
Copy link
Member

trallard commented Feb 3, 2020

@celliern, @dvanic, @remram44 @fabioanomenegidio, @astrisovic I am the editor for this submission and we are looking for at least 2 reviewers. Would you be able/willing to review this submission?

Some important information:

Our reviewer guidelines can be found here https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/review_criteria.html

@trallard
Copy link
Member

trallard commented Feb 3, 2020

/ooo today until February 10, 2020

@ooo
Copy link

ooo bot commented Feb 3, 2020

@trallard
Copy link
Member

trallard commented Feb 3, 2020

@whedon assign @eteq as reviewer

@whedon whedon assigned eteq and trallard and unassigned trallard Feb 3, 2020
@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Feb 3, 2020

OK, @eteq is now a reviewer

@dvanic
Copy link

dvanic commented Feb 3, 2020 via email

@trallard
Copy link
Member

trallard commented Feb 4, 2020

Thanks @dvanic!

@trallard
Copy link
Member

trallard commented Feb 4, 2020

@whedon add @dvanic as reviewer

@whedon whedon assigned dvanic, eteq and trallard and unassigned eteq and trallard Feb 4, 2020
@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Feb 4, 2020

OK, @dvanic is now a reviewer

@arfon
Copy link
Member

arfon commented Feb 14, 2020

@trallard - this looks like it's ready to move to review unless I'm missing something?

@trallard
Copy link
Member

@whedon start review

@whedon
Copy link
Author

whedon commented Feb 15, 2020

OK, I've started the review over in #2107.

@whedon whedon closed this as completed Feb 15, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

8 participants