[PRE REVIEW]: pyCeterisParibus: explaining Machine Learning models with Ceteris Paribus Profiles in Python

[whedon]

Submitting author: @kmichael08 (Michał Kuźba)
Repository: https://github.com/ModelOriented/pyCeterisParibus
Version: v0.5
Editor: @katyhuff
Reviewers: janfreyberg, justinshenk

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @kmichael08. Currently, there isn't an JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@kmichael08 if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread. In addition, this list of people have already agreed to review for JOSS and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @whedon is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @whedon can do for you type:

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Hello human, I'm @whedon, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@whedon commands

What happens now?

This submission is currently in a pre-review state which means we are waiting for an editor to be assigned and for them to find some reviewers for your submission. This may take anything between a few hours to a couple of weeks. Thanks for your patience 😸

You can help the editor by looking at this list of potential reviewers to identify individuals who might be able to review your submission (please start at the bottom of the list). Also, feel free to suggest individuals who are not on this list by mentioning their GitHub handles here.

[whedon]

Attempting PDF compilation. Reticulating splines etc...

[whedon]

👉 Check article proof 📄 👈

[kmichael08]

@whedon commands

[whedon]

Here are some things you can ask me to do:

# List Whedon's capabilities
@whedon commands

# List of editor GitHub usernames
@whedon list editors

# List of reviewers together with programming language preferences and domain expertise
@whedon list reviewers

EDITORIAL TASKS

# Compile the paper
@whedon generate pdf

# Compile the paper from alternative branch
@whedon generate pdf from branch custom-branch-name

# Ask Whedon to check the references for missing DOIs
@whedon check references

[kmichael08]

@whedon list editors

[whedon]

Current editors:

@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman
@VivianePons
@alexhanna
@arfon
@arokem
@brainstorm
@cMadan
@danielskatz
@eramirem
@gkthiruvathukal
@jasonclark
@jedbrown
@karthik
@katyhuff
@kthyng
@kyleniemeyer
@labarba
@leouieda
@lheagy
@lpantano
@mgymrek
@pjotrp
@poulson
@trallard
@usethedata
@xuanxu
@yochannah

[ooo]

👋 Hey @whedon...

Letting you know, @kthyng is currently OOO until Sunday, March 31st 2019. ❤️

[ooo]

👋 Hey @whedon...

Letting you know, @trallard is currently OOO until Sunday, April 7th 2019. ❤️

[ooo]

👋 Hey @whedon...

Letting you know, @yochannah is currently OOO until Monday, April 1st 2019. ❤️

[arfon]

👋 @katyhuff - would you be willing to edit this submission for JOSS?

[danielskatz]

👋 @katyhuff - ping...

[katyhuff]

Hi both,
I don't have any R expertise and will not be able to appropriately vet reviewers for this submission.

[katyhuff]

Sorry -- I misread the README. I see now it's a python package mimicking an R package. I am ok with editing this, though the author should be alerted that I will be unresponsive from April 3-9.

[katyhuff]

@whedon assign @katyhuff as editor

[whedon]

OK, the editor is @katyhuff

[danielskatz]

@katyhuff - this is python, as far as I can tell, though it is based on something in R

[kmichael08]

Hello, yes it's a Python package. There is just a mention of the same idea being implemented earlier in R
(by one of the co-authors).

[katyhuff]

Yes, I see that now -- sorry about that -- was in a bit of a rush this morning. I'll try to identify appropriate reviewers today, but if you have anyone in mind, @kmichael08 suggestions are always welcome.

[kmichael08]

@katyhuff no worries! I believe it would be great to have it reviewed by @kellieotto, @desilinguist, @expectopatronum, @JustinShenk, @adavidzh, @janfreyberg. What do you think?

[adavidzh]

Sorry, am afraid I cannot take this one at this point in time.

[expectopatronum]

What would be the time schedule? I would be happy to review, but I have a paper deadline coming up.

[janfreyberg]

I'd be happy to review this.

[JustinShenk]

I’d be happy to review this.

[desilinguist]

Sorry, I’m in the middle of reviewing papers for our annual conference so I’ll have to bow out for this one.

On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 6:20 AM Justin Shenk ***@***.***> wrote: I’d be happy to review this. — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#1348 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAJ3kJapkdN-Ovk2Z3qtD6ctOdZ-yz9rks5vbejTgaJpZM4cFifc> .

-- Linguist, Desi Linguist http://www.desilinguist.org

[kmichael08]

Fantastic! @katyhuff it looks like we've found some great reviewers?

[kmichael08]

Hello @katyhuff . You've mentioned your absence for April 3-9. I wonder, maybe it's possible to assign reviewers before that period?

[kmichael08]

@katyhuff @danielskatz @arfon I'm a bit of lost on what is going on and what can I possibly do here to help

[danielskatz]

It looks like @katyhuff as the editor currently has the task of finding reviewers and starting the review. I see reviewers who have agreed, so Katy just needs to assign them now, and start the review, which I'm sure she will do shortly

[katyhuff]

Sorry -- I'm back. Thanks for the pings.

[katyhuff]

@whedon assign janfreyberg as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, the reviewer is janfreyberg

[katyhuff]

@whedon add justinshenk as reviewer

[whedon]

OK, justinshenk is now a reviewer

[katyhuff]

@whedon start review

[whedon]

OK, I've started the review over in #1389. Feel free to close this issue now!

[katyhuff]

Thank you, @kmichael08 and @danielskatz , for your patience and timely reminder! Thank you Jan and Justin (@janfreyberg @JustinShenk ) for volunteering to review. Let's start the review over in #1389 .