Skip to content

8353655: Clean up and open source KeyEvent related tests (Part 1) #24609

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

azuev-java
Copy link
Member

@azuev-java azuev-java commented Apr 13, 2025

Clean up and open source three tests related to the KeyEvent mechanics.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8353655: Clean up and open source KeyEvent related tests (Part 1) (Bug - P4)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/24609/head:pull/24609
$ git checkout pull/24609

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/24609
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/24609/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 24609

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 24609

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24609.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

Clean up and open source three tests related to the KeyEvent mechanics.
@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Apr 13, 2025

👋 Welcome back kizune! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 13, 2025

❗ This change is not yet ready to be integrated.
See the Progress checklist in the description for automated requirements.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Apr 13, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 13, 2025

@azuev-java The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • client

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Apr 13, 2025

Webrevs

.build()
.awaitAndCheck();
}
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Blank line after this ?

/*
* @test
* @bug 4308606
* @summary Tests whether the keys on the numeric keyboard work
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
* @summary Tests whether the keys on the numeric keyboard work
* @summary Tests whether the keys on the numeric keyboard work

Comment on lines +107 to +109
case KeyEvent.KEY_TYPED:
str = "KEY_TYPED";
break;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

printKey is not invoked from keyTyped method and this case statement won't be reachable. Can be removed safely.

}

protected void printKey(KeyEvent evt) {
switch(evt.getID()) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
switch(evt.getID()) {
switch (evt.getID()) {


protected void printKey(KeyEvent evt) {
String str;
switch(evt.getID()) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
switch(evt.getID()) {
switch (evt.getID()) {

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
client [email protected] rfr Pull request is ready for review
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants