feat(ci): adding parallel workflow validate #303
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
![ellipsis-dev[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/64358?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
❌ Changes requested. Reviewed everything up to e6aa0da in 2 minutes and 5 seconds
More details
- Looked at
169lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
8drafted comments based on config settings.
1. .github/workflows/parallel-workflow-validate.yml:113
- Draft comment:
DATABASE_URL host 'db.localtest.me' may not match the service name 'postgres'; ensure the hostname resolves correctly. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50%
The comment raises a valid point - there seems to be an inconsistency between using 'db.localtest.me' vs 'postgres' as the hostname. However, 'db.localtest.me' is a special DNS name that likely resolves correctly in the GitHub Actions environment. The fact that there's a neon-proxy service suggests this setup is intentional. Without more context about how the networking is configured, I can't be certain this is actually a problem.
I might be missing some GitHub Actions networking details. The different hostnames could be intentional due to the neon-proxy setup.
Given the presence of the neon-proxy service and the specialized DNS name, this is likely an intentional configuration rather than an error.
The comment should be deleted as it makes assumptions about the networking setup without sufficient context to be certain there's an issue.
2. .github/workflows/parallel-workflow-validate.yml:157
- Draft comment:
Verify the secret name 'SLATIFY_SLACK_WEBHOOK_URL' is correct (possible typo) to ensure Slack notifications work. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful =40%<= threshold50%
The comment is asking the PR author to verify the secret name, which is against the rules as it asks for confirmation. However, it does suggest a possible typo, which could be useful. I need to determine if the suggestion of a typo is specific enough to be considered a code suggestion rather than a request for confirmation.
3. .github/workflows/parallel-workflow-validate.yml:24
- Draft comment:
Confirm Node v22 is intentional; ensure all tools support it. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful =0%<= threshold50%
The comment asks the PR author to confirm their intention regarding the use of Node v22 and to ensure compatibility with all tools. This violates the rule against asking the author to confirm their intention or ensure compatibility.
4. .github/workflows/parallel-workflow-validate.yml:92
- Draft comment:
Avoid using 'postgres:latest'; pin to a specific version for build consistency. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Marked as duplicate.
5. .github/workflows/parallel-workflow-validate.yml:106
- Draft comment:
Consider pinning the neon-proxy image to a specific tag instead of 'main' to prevent unexpected changes. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Marked as duplicate.
6. .github/workflows/parallel-workflow-validate.yml:157
- Draft comment:
Verify that SLATIFY_SLACK_WEBHOOK_URL is the intended secret name (vs. typical 'SLACK'). - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful =0%<= threshold50%
The comment is asking the author to verify the intention behind the secret nameSLATIFY_SLACK_WEBHOOK_URL. This falls under asking the author to confirm their intention, which is against the rules. Therefore, this comment should be removed.
7. .github/workflows/parallel-workflow-validate.yml:51
- Draft comment:
Repeated 'pnpm install' in multiple jobs may slow down the workflow; consider centralizing dependency installation and reusing artifacts if practical. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%<= threshold50%
None
8. .github/workflows/parallel-workflow-validate.yml:163
- Draft comment:
There appears to be a potential typographical error in the environment variable name. On line 163, the Slack webhook URL is set using the secret 'SLATIFY_SLACK_WEBHOOK_URL'. Please verify if 'SLATIFY' is intentional or if it should be corrected to 'SLACK' (i.e. 'SLACK_WEBHOOK_URL') to maintain consistency. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50%
While the secret name is unusual with SLATIFY prefix, this could be intentional naming in their organization. The action will still work as long as the environment variable is set correctly, which it is (SLACK_WEBHOOK_URL). The secret name itself is an implementation detail that doesn't affect functionality. We can't know if this is a real issue without more context about their secret naming conventions.
The secret name could be intentionally prefixed with SLATIFY for organizational reasons. The code is functionally correct as written.
Since the code works as written and secret naming is an organizational choice, this comment is more speculative than helpful.
Delete this comment as it's speculating about naming conventions without clear evidence of an actual problem. The code is functionally correct as written.
Workflow ID: wflow_jLVuxlHGImlkpF1M
Want Ellipsis to fix these issues? Tag @ellipsis-dev in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
| timeout-minutes: 10 | ||
| services: | ||
| postgres: | ||
| image: postgres:latest |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Avoid using unpinned Docker image tags (e.g., postgres:latest). Pin specific versions to ensure build reproducibility.
Suggested change
| image: postgres:latest | |
| image: postgres:13.3 |
| --health-timeout 5s | ||
| --health-retries 5 | ||
| neon-proxy: | ||
| image: ghcr.io/timowilhelm/local-neon-http-proxy:main |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Avoid using mutable tags (e.g., ghcr.io/timowilhelm/local-neon-http-proxy:main). Pin to a specific version to prevent unexpected changes.
Suggested change
| image: ghcr.io/timowilhelm/local-neon-http-proxy:main | |
| image: ghcr.io/timowilhelm/local-neon-http-proxy:v1.0.0 |
| - run: pnpm install --frozen-lockfile | ||
| - name: Setup test environment | ||
| run: | | ||
| npm install --global vercel@latest |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pin the vercel CLI version instead of using --latest to avoid unexpected breaking changes.
Suggested change
| npm install --global vercel@latest | |
| npm install --global vercel@2.0.0 |
| env: | ||
| NODE_OPTIONS: --max-old-space-size=8192 | ||
| VERCEL_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.VERCEL_TOKEN }} | ||
| DATABASE_URL: postgres://postgres:[email protected]:5432/postgres |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
DATABASE_URL uses 'db.localtest.me'; consider using the service hostname 'postgres' to avoid potential DNS issues.
Suggested change
| DATABASE_URL: postgres://postgres:password@db.localtest.me:5432/postgres | |
| DATABASE_URL: postgres://postgres:password@postgres:5432/postgres |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
❌ Changes requested. Incremental review on c19e013 in 1 minute and 24 seconds
More details
- Looked at
41lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
3drafted comments based on config settings.
1. .github/workflows/parallel-workflow-validate.yml:85
- Draft comment:
Ensure increased memory (--max-old-space-size=4096) is necessary for linting; confirm it doesn't mask underlying issues. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%<= threshold50%
None
2. .github/workflows/parallel-workflow-validate.yml:154
- Draft comment:
Consider removing commented-out slack-notification block if it's no longer needed to keep the file clean. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%
None
3. .github/workflows/parallel-workflow-validate.yml:85
- Draft comment:
Consider adding a comment on why NODE_OPTIONS is increased for lint. If linter needs more memory, mention it explicitly for future maintainers. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%
None
Workflow ID: wflow_L7OSpchT2nfEjDsN
Want Ellipsis to fix these issues? Tag @ellipsis-dev in a comment. You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
| name: build-artifacts | ||
| path: ./artifacts | ||
|
|
||
| # slack-notification: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Avoid leaving commented-out jobs in the workflow. Consider removing the slack notification block or adding a note explaining why it's disabled.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on fac414a in 36 seconds
More details
- Looked at
13lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
2drafted comments based on config settings.
1. .github/workflows/parallel-workflow-validate.yml:86
- Draft comment:
Ensure this increased memory allocation is necessary or document the reason. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful =0%<= threshold50%
The comment is asking the PR author to ensure that the increased memory allocation is necessary or to document the reason. This falls under asking the author to confirm their intention or to explain their change, which violates the rules.
2. .github/workflows/parallel-workflow-validate.yml:86
- Draft comment:
Why increase memory to 8192 for lint? Add a comment explaining the necessity. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful =0%<= threshold50%
The comment is asking for an explanation of a change, which violates the rule against asking the PR author to explain or confirm their intention. It doesn't provide a specific suggestion or point out a potential issue with the code itself.
Workflow ID: wflow_3igv2uTBn8rdC0j4
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on d6f8e31 in 1 minute and 12 seconds
More details
- Looked at
54lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
3drafted comments based on config settings.
1. .github/workflows/parallel-workflow-validate.yml:43
- Draft comment:
Use computed output 'cache-key' for cache key, for consistency with later jobs. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
2. .github/workflows/parallel-workflow-validate.yml:18
- Draft comment:
Good use of a job output for the cache key. For consistency and to avoid duplication, consider using the value from the 'set-cache-key' step also in the install-dependencies caching step. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was on unchanged code.
3. .github/workflows/parallel-workflow-validate.yml:25
- Draft comment:
The new 'Set cache key' step correctly computes the cache key. To ensure DRY principles, consider referencing this output in the cache action (instead of recalculating the key) so that any future change applies uniformly. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was on unchanged code.
Workflow ID: wflow_0d5WuLSK2gL37mzu
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me! Incremental review on b6afee1 in 1 minute and 11 seconds
More details
- Looked at
175lines of code in2files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
10drafted comments based on config settings.
1. .github/workflows/parallel-workflow-validate.yml:9
- Draft comment:
Ensure the concurrency group key using${{ github.ref }}meets your intent. In some cases, more granular keys (like branch name) might be preferable. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:30%<= threshold50%
None
2. .github/workflows/parallel-workflow-validate.yml:25
- Draft comment:
The cache key is computed using GitHub expressions in the shell echo. Confirm this behavior aligns with your caching strategy. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:20%<= threshold50%
None
3. .github/workflows/parallel-workflow-validate.yml:102
- Draft comment:
Using 'postgres:latest' can lead to unexpected version updates. Pinning to a specific version is recommended for build stability. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
4. .github/workflows/parallel-workflow-validate.yml:116
- Draft comment:
Consider pinning the neon-proxy image to a specific version rather than using the 'main' tag to ensure reproducible builds. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
5. .github/workflows/parallel-workflow-validate.yml:10
- Draft comment:
Ensure the branch reference used in the concurrency group (validate-${{ github.ref }}) is sanitized to avoid issues with special characters. Consider normalizing the branch name if needed. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%<= threshold50%
None
6. .github/workflows/parallel-workflow-validate.yml:124
- Draft comment:
DATABASE_URL uses the host 'db.localtest.me' while the PostgreSQL service is named 'postgres'. Verify that 'db.localtest.me' correctly resolves to the service container to avoid connection issues. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
7. .github/workflows/parallel-workflow-validate.yml:158
- Draft comment:
The 'Archive artifacts' step archives the './artifacts' directory, but no prior step creates or populates it. Remove or update this step if artifacts are not generated. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
8. .github/workflows/parallel-workflow-validate.yml:142
- Draft comment:
Installing 'vercel@latest' globally may introduce instability if a breaking change is released. Consider pinning to a specific version for better reproducibility. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
9. .github/workflows/parallel-workflow-validate.yml:149
- Draft comment:
Starting development servers in the background using '&' may leave orphan processes if something goes wrong. Consider adding explicit process management or cleanup steps and/or additional health checks. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%<= threshold50%
None
10. .github/workflows/parallel-workflow-validate.yml:55
- Draft comment:
Dependencies are installed separately in each job (e.g., in typecheck, lint, and tests) even though caching is used for the pnpm store. While each job runs in isolation, consider exploring artifact or workspace caching to avoid redundant installations and improve CI speed. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%<= threshold50%
None
Workflow ID: wflow_eF1IXHIsuoQA8bPD
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Important
Introduces a parallel validation workflow in GitHub Actions, replacing the sequential workflow to improve efficiency.
parallel-workflow-validate.ymlfor parallel validation in GitHub Actions.pushtomainandproduction,pull_request, andworkflow_dispatch.validate-${{ github.ref }}withcancel-in-progressenabled.install-dependencies: Sets up Node.js, pnpm, caches dependencies, and installs them.typecheck: Runs type checks after installing dependencies.lint: Runs linting with increased memory allocation.tests: Sets up PostgreSQL and Neon Proxy services, runs migrations, starts dev servers, and executes tests.validate-workflow.yml, which ran type checks, lint, and tests sequentially.This description was created by
for b6afee1. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.