Skip to content

Update TrustyAI Org name #1786

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

RobGeada
Copy link
Contributor

Description

The TrustyAI organization is being renamed from trustyai-explainability to trustyai- this PR updates the component manifest list accordingly.

How Has This Been Tested?

Screenshot or short clip

Merge criteria

  • You have read the contributors guide.
  • Commit messages are meaningful - have a clear and concise summary and detailed explanation of what was changed and why.
  • Pull Request contains a description of the solution, a link to the JIRA issue, and to any dependent or related Pull Request.
  • Testing instructions have been added in the PR body (for PRs involving changes that are not immediately obvious).
  • The developer has manually tested the changes and verified that the changes work

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 24, 2025

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 24, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign lphiri for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 24, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 24.54%. Comparing base (b4ab7d5) to head (4a9a67a).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1786   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   24.54%   24.54%           
=======================================
  Files         172      172           
  Lines       11874    11874           
=======================================
  Hits         2915     2915           
  Misses       8679     8679           
  Partials      280      280           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@zdtsw
Copy link
Member

zdtsw commented Mar 26, 2025

not sure why at the beginning we picked upstream "trustyai-explainability" as org, instead of "opendatahub-io"
should it be set to "opendatahub-io" in this PR if build by Operator is for the "opendatahub-io" ?
(unless you do not sync code from "trustyai-explainability" to "opendatahub-io" till each ODH release )

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented May 29, 2025

@RobGeada: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/ci-bundle-opendatahub-operator-bundle 4a9a67a link true /test ci-bundle-opendatahub-operator-bundle

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@zdtsw
Copy link
Member

zdtsw commented Jun 2, 2025

@RobGeada is this still planned or we can close it?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: Todo
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants