Skip to content

update saturating calculation in rewards #1016

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 14, 2025
Merged

update saturating calculation in rewards #1016

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 14, 2025

Conversation

zjb0807
Copy link
Contributor

@zjb0807 zjb0807 commented Jan 14, 2025

No description provided.

@zjb0807 zjb0807 requested a review from xlc January 14, 2025 01:25
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 14, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 65.40%. Comparing base (8285019) to head (d946f57).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
rewards/src/lib.rs 0.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1016      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   65.43%   65.40%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files          49       49              
  Lines        3726     3726              
==========================================
- Hits         2438     2437       -1     
- Misses       1288     1289       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@xlc xlc merged commit 6720fcd into master Jan 14, 2025
3 of 5 checks passed
@xlc xlc deleted the fix-types branch January 14, 2025 01:36
xlc pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 14, 2025
xlc pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 14, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants