[CLA on File] style: added padding to object & icon button labels

[taintedbones]

Closes #3822 #3568

Describe your changes:

Added 1px padding to the top and bottom of object & icon button labels. This fixes issues with labels being clipped on the bottom.

All Submissions:

• Have you followed the guidelines in our Contributing document?
• Have you checked to ensure there aren't other open Pull Requests for the same update/change?
• Is this change backwards compatible? For example, developers won't need to change how they are calling the API or how they've extended core plugins such as Tables or Plots.

Author Checklist

• Changes address original issue?
• Tests included and/or updated with changes?
• Command line build passes?
• Has this been smoke tested?
• Testing instructions included in associated issue OR is this a dependency/testcase change?

Reviewer Checklist

• Changes appear to address issue?
• Reviewer has tested changes by following the provided instructions?
• Changes appear not to be breaking changes?
• Appropriate automated tests included?
• Code style and in-line documentation are appropriate?
• Has associated issue been labelled unverified? (only applicable if this PR closes the issue)
• Has associated issue been labelled bug? (only applicable if this PR is for a bug fix)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #6036 (91e52d7) into master (f98a2cd) will decrease coverage by 0.36%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

❗ Current head 91e52d7 differs from pull request most recent head e5e9d9f. Consider uploading reports for the commit e5e9d9f to get more accurate results

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #6036      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   55.25%   54.89%   -0.36%     
==========================================
  Files         602      600       -2     
  Lines       24276    23599     -677     
  Branches     2147     2103      -44     
==========================================
- Hits        13413    12954     -459     
+ Misses      10257    10046     -211     
+ Partials      606      599       -7     

Flag	Coverage Δ		*Carryforward flag
e2e-ci	39.49% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 8cd6a50
e2e-full	51.23% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 8cd6a50
e2e-stable	50.06% <ø> (-2.31%)	⬇️
unit	50.38% <ø> (+0.23%)	⬆️

*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/plugins/operatorStatus/plugin.js	0.00% <0.00%> (-100.00%)	⬇️
...eratorStatus/pollQuestion/PollQuestionIndicator.js	0.00% <0.00%> (-100.00%)	⬇️
...orStatus/operatorStatus/OperatorStatusIndicator.js	0.00% <0.00%> (-100.00%)	⬇️
.../plugins/operatorStatus/AbstractStatusIndicator.js	0.00% <0.00%> (-93.75%)	⬇️
src/api/user/StatusAPI.js	40.25% <0.00%> (-44.16%)	⬇️
src/plugins/viewLargeAction/viewLargeAction.js	40.00% <0.00%> (-35.00%)	⬇️
src/plugins/linkAction/LinkAction.js	69.23% <0.00%> (-13.44%)	⬇️
example/exampleUser/ExampleUserProvider.js	55.55% <0.00%> (-13.20%)	⬇️
src/plugins/move/MoveAction.js	77.50% <0.00%> (-6.13%)	⬇️
src/api/indicators/SimpleIndicator.js	92.68% <0.00%> (-4.88%)	⬇️
... and 40 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update f98a2cd...e5e9d9f. Read the comment docs.

[akhenry]

@taintedbones Thanks for taking a look at this! The fix works @ 100% zoom, which is awesome. Problem is still occurring at other zoom levels though.

eg.

Chrome @ 100% ✅

Chrome @ 110% ❌

[taintedbones]

@akhenry Thank you for the feedback! So I went back to check on this and couldn't replicate the issue on my branch. However, when I swapped over to master branch, the issue existed there.

Chrome 100%

Chrome 110%

[akhenry]

@taintedbones OK, let me take another look! Thanks.

[akhenry]

Have retested and this looks good to me. Sorry, I don't know what I did last time :)

@charlesh88 This look good to you?

[charlesh88]

Not sure why this branch is changing plot images in the e2e tests folder... CSS changes look good, and this is good to go once we clarify what's going on with e2e images.

[ozyx]

Not sure why this branch is changing plot images in the e2e tests folder... CSS changes look good, and this is good to go once we clarify what's going on with e2e images.

@charlesh88:
These changes were from me. Needed to update our e2e snapshots due to visual change on the main view. The object name in the main view above the plot got a 1px padding so it squashed the plot by 1 pixel, causing the snapshot tests to fail. Any issues you foresee with that?