[ISSUE #568]🔨Update label-on-approval.ym #569
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes modify a GitHub Actions workflow file ( Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related issues
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
|
🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉, CodeRabbit will review your code.🔥 |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/label-on-approval.yml (1)
Line range hint
14-31: Refactor the script to improve readability and maintainability.- const { owner, repo } = context.repo; - const { pull_request, review } = context.payload; - const collaborators = ['mxsm', 'TeslaRustor','SpaceXCN']; // Replace with actual GitHub usernames - console.log('state:', review.state); - console.log('review:', review.state === 'approved'); - console.log('Collaborators:', collaborators); - console.log('User:', collaborators.includes(review.user.login)); - const isApprovedByCollaborator = review.state === 'approved' && collaborators.includes(review.user.login); - console.log('isApprovedByCollaborator:', isApprovedByCollaborator); - console.log('pull_request:', pull_request.number); + const { owner, repo } = context.repo; + const { pull_request, review } = context.payload; + const collaborators = ['mxsm', 'TeslaRustor','SpaceXCN']; // Replace with actual GitHub usernames + const isApprovedByCollaborator = review.state === 'approved' && collaborators.includes(review.user.login); + if (isApprovedByCollaborator) { + await github.rest.issues.addLabels({ + owner, + repo, + issue_number: pull_request.number, + labels: ['approved','auto merge'] + }); + }Remove unnecessary logging and streamline the script to focus on essential operations.
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/label-on-approval.yml (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (3)
.github/workflows/label-on-approval.yml (3)
4-6: The change topull_request_targetand the branch specification are appropriate for workflows that need to run in the context of the base repository, not the fork. This is crucial for actions that require a higher permission level.
6-6: Ensure that the branch name matches the main development branch in your repository.Verification successful
The main development branch in the repository is correctly named 'main'.
- .github/workflows/label-on-approval.yml: Line 6
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the main branch name in the repository. # Test: Search for the main branch name in the repository settings. Expect: Confirm if 'main' is correct. cat .github/settings.yml | grep 'default_branch'Length of output: 101
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the main branch name in the repository. # Test: Get the default branch name using git command. Expect: Confirm if 'main' is correct. git symbolic-ref refs/remotes/origin/HEAD | sed 's@^refs/remotes/origin/@@'Length of output: 82
4-4: Consider adding more event types to cover all necessary scenarios.
Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)
Fixes #568
Brief Description
How Did You Test This Change?
Summary by CodeRabbit