[ISSUE ##527]🔨Optimize auto request review

[mxsm]

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Fixes #527

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated default reviewers to repository-owners and set the number of reviewers to 2.
  • Modified GitHub token parameter in the workflow to GITHUB_TOKEN.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

This update enhances the review process by changing default reviewers to repository-owners, ignoring draft pull requests, and requesting reviews from two reviewers. Additionally, it modifies the token key name in the workflow file to use GITHUB_TOKEN.

Changes

File	Change Summary
.github/reviewers.yml	Set default reviewers to repository-owners, ignore drafts, and require two reviewers
.github/workflows/auto_request_review.yml	Changed GitHub token parameter key from token to GITHUB_TOKEN

Assessment against linked issues

Objective	Addressed	Explanation
Optimize auto request review (#527)	✅

Poem

In code so fine, in structure clear,
Enhancements bloom, let's give a cheer! 🎉
Reviewers set, requests to flow,
With tokens changed, our tasks in tow.
A rabbit's touch, in lines we trust,
To streamline reviews is a must. 🌟

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between d3dc147 and ff93f4d.

Files selected for processing (2)

• .github/reviewers.yml (1 hunks)
• .github/workflows/auto_request_review.yml (1 hunks)

Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)

• .github/reviewers.yml
• .github/workflows/auto_request_review.yml

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 25.36%. Comparing base (d3dc147) to head (ff93f4d).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

❗ Current head ff93f4d differs from pull request most recent head 4a5d2ec

Please upload reports for the commit 4a5d2ec to get more accurate results.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #528      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   25.37%   25.36%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         233      233              
  Lines       17014    17014              
==========================================
- Hits         4317     4315       -2     
- Misses      12697    12699       +2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.