Skip to content

[ISSUE #3390] ♻️Refactor GetConsumerListByGroupRequestHeader with derive marco RequestHeaderCodec #3483

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jun 20, 2025

Conversation

donghao526
Copy link
Contributor

@donghao526 donghao526 commented Jun 19, 2025

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Fixes #3390

Brief Description

Refactor GetConsumerListByGroupRequestHeader with derive marco RequestHeaderCodec

How Did You Test This Change?

run unit test local

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Simplified internal logic for handling request headers, resulting in more maintainable and streamlined code.
  • Tests
    • Minor updates to test code to align with internal changes.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 19, 2025

Walkthrough

The code refactors the GetConsumerListByGroupRequestHeader struct by removing manual trait implementations for header serialization and deserialization, replacing them with the RequestHeaderCodec derive macro. The consumer_group field is now marked as required, and imports are adjusted accordingly. Associated tests are updated to reflect these changes.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/header/get_consumer_listby_group_request_header.rs Replaced manual CommandCustomHeader/FromMap trait implementations with RequestHeaderCodec macro; added #[required] to consumer_group; updated imports and tests.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Caller
    participant GetConsumerListByGroupRequestHeader
    Note over GetConsumerListByGroupRequestHeader: Serialization/Deserialization now via macro
    Caller->>GetConsumerListByGroupRequestHeader: Create instance
    Caller->>GetConsumerListByGroupRequestHeader: Serialize/Deserialize via macro-generated logic
Loading

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Refactor GetConsumerListByGroupRequestHeader with derive macro RequestHeaderCodec (#3390)
Remove manual implementations and update test code accordingly (#3390)
Ensure the refactor does not introduce new bugs and update unit tests if applicable (#3390)

Assessment against linked issues: Out-of-scope changes

No out-of-scope changes found.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

refactor♻️, rocketmq-remoting crate, Difficulty level/Easy, AI review first, ready to review

Suggested reviewers

  • TeslaRustor
  • rocketmq-rust-bot
  • mxsm

Poem

A rabbit hopped through RocketMQ’s code,
Swapping hand-written traits for a macro’d road.
With #[required] marked and tests in tow,
Serialization’s simpler—let the headers flow!
Refactors abound, the code feels light,
Macro magic makes it right. 🐇✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between eb1649a and 64c5f2c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/header/get_consumer_listby_group_request_header.rs (2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (9)
  • GitHub Check: build (macos-latest, stable)
  • GitHub Check: test
  • GitHub Check: build
  • GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, stable)
  • GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest, stable)
  • GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, nightly)
  • GitHub Check: build (macos-latest, nightly)
  • GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest, nightly)
  • GitHub Check: auto-approve
🔇 Additional comments (5)
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/header/get_consumer_listby_group_request_header.rs (5)

18-18: LGTM: Import addition is appropriate.

The new import for RequestHeaderCodec is correctly placed and necessary for the derive macro.


24-24: LGTM: Derive macro addition simplifies the implementation.

Adding RequestHeaderCodec to the derive list should automatically generate the necessary serialization and deserialization logic, replacing the manual trait implementations mentioned in the summary.


39-40: Import organization looks good.

Moving the CommandCustomHeader and FromMap imports to the test module is appropriate since they're only needed for testing the generated implementations.


27-27: Verify the #[required] attribute syntax.

The #[required] attribute on the consumer_group field appears to be macro-specific syntax. Please ensure this is the correct attribute name and format expected by the RequestHeaderCodec macro.

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for other uses of the #[required] attribute to verify correct syntax
# Expected: Find other examples of #[required] usage with RequestHeaderCodec

ast-grep --pattern '#[required]'

49-66: Verify test compatibility with the macro-generated implementations.

The tests reference CONSUMER_GROUP constant and use to_map() and FromMap::from() methods that were supposedly removed according to the AI summary. Please ensure the RequestHeaderCodec macro generates these APIs with compatible signatures and behavior.

Run the tests to verify they still pass after the refactoring:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Run the specific tests for GetConsumerListByGroupRequestHeader
# Expected: Tests should pass if the macro generates compatible implementations

cargo test get_consumer_list_by_group_request_header --verbose
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@rocketmq-rust-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

🔊@donghao526 🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉!

💡CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥!

Note

🚨The code review suggestions from CodeRabbit are to be used as a reference only, and the PR submitter can decide whether to make changes based on their own judgment. Ultimately, the project management personnel will conduct the final code review💥.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 19, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 50.00000% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 26.34%. Comparing base (391b824) to head (64c5f2c).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...header/get_consumer_listby_group_request_header.rs 50.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3483      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   26.35%   26.34%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         547      547              
  Lines       77899    77882      -17     
==========================================
- Hits        20532    20516      -16     
+ Misses      57367    57366       -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Copy link
Collaborator

@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Owner

@mxsm mxsm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@mxsm mxsm merged commit b715013 into mxsm:main Jun 20, 2025
23 of 26 checks passed
@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot added approved PR has approved and removed ready to review waiting-review waiting review this PR labels Jun 20, 2025
@donghao526 donghao526 deleted the issue-3390 branch June 20, 2025 05:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Refactor♻️]Refactor GetConsumerListByGroupRequestHeader with derive marco RequestHeaderCodec
4 participants