[ISSUE #3464]📝Update comments in get_message_result.rs for clarity on offsets and buffer size #3465
Conversation
… offsets and buffer size
WalkthroughDocumentation comments for the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
rocketmq-rust-bot
requested review from
rocketmq-rust-bot,
SpaceXCN and
TeslaRustor
|
🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉！ 💡CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥！ Note 🚨The code review suggestions from CodeRabbit are to be used as a reference only, and the PR submitter can decide whether to make changes based on their own judgment. Ultimately, the project management personnel will conduct the final code review💥. |
rocketmq-rust-robot
added
the
documentation📝
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull Request Overview
This PR updates the in-code comments in get_message_result.rs to clarify the meaning of offsets and the buffer size.
- Clarified the description for next_begin_offset to explicitly state its purpose for consuming the queue.
- Updated min_offset and max_offset comment descriptions for consistency and clarity.
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (3)
rocketmq-store/src/base/get_message_result.rs:33
- [nitpick] Consider rephrasing to: 'The next beginning offset from which messages should be consumed.' to improve clarity and consistency.
/// The next beginning offset. Consume queue from this offset.
rocketmq-store/src/base/get_message_result.rs:35
- [nitpick] Adding a definite article could improve readability: 'The minimum offset of the consume queue.'
/// The minimum offset of consume queue
rocketmq-store/src/base/get_message_result.rs:37
- [nitpick] Consider updating the comment to: 'The maximum offset of the consume queue.' for better clarity.
/// The maximum offset of consume queue
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
rocketmq-store/src/base/get_message_result.rs (3)
33-34: Refine comment punctuation and wording for clarity.Current:
/// The next beginning offset. Consume queue from this offset.Consider merging into one sentence and adding a period for consistency:
- /// The next beginning offset. Consume queue from this offset. + /// The next beginning offset of the consume queue.
35-36: Add missing article and period for consistency.Current:
/// The minimum offset of consume queueSuggest including “the” and ending with a period:
- /// The minimum offset of consume queue + /// The minimum offset of the consume queue.
37-38: Add missing article and period for consistency.Current:
/// The maximum offset of consume queueRecommend:
- /// The maximum offset of consume queue + /// The maximum offset of the consume queue.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
rocketmq-store/src/base/get_message_result.rs(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (9)
- GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, stable)
- GitHub Check: build (windows-latest, nightly)
- GitHub Check: build (macos-latest, nightly)
- GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest, nightly)
- GitHub Check: build (macos-latest, stable)
- GitHub Check: build (ubuntu-latest, stable)
- GitHub Check: build
- GitHub Check: auto-approve
- GitHub Check: test
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #3465 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 26.47% 26.47%
=======================================
Files 545 545
Lines 77754 77754
=======================================
Hits 20583 20583
Misses 57171 57171 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
rocketmq-rust-bot
added
approved
Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)
Fixes #3464
Brief Description
How Did You Test This Change?
Summary by CodeRabbit